Unveiling the Molecular Effects of Replacement and Legacy PFASs: Transcriptomic Analysis of Zebrafish Embryos Reveals Surprising Similarities and Potencies.

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
环境科学与技术 Pub Date : 2024-10-22 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c04246
Hannah Mahoney, Phillip Ankley, Catherine Roberts, Alicia Lamb, Matthew Schultz, Yutong Zhou, John P Giesy, Markus Brinkmann
{"title":"Unveiling the Molecular Effects of Replacement and Legacy PFASs: Transcriptomic Analysis of Zebrafish Embryos Reveals Surprising Similarities and Potencies.","authors":"Hannah Mahoney, Phillip Ankley, Catherine Roberts, Alicia Lamb, Matthew Schultz, Yutong Zhou, John P Giesy, Markus Brinkmann","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c04246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of per- and poly fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in the environment has prompted restrictions on legacy PFASs due to their recognized toxic effects. Consequently, alternative \"replacement\" PFASs have been introduced and are prevalent in environmental matrices. Few studies have investigated the molecular effects of both legacy and replacement PFASs under short-term exposures. This study aimed to address this by utilizing transcriptomic sequencing to compare the molecular impacts of exposure to concentrations 0.001-5 mg/L of the legacy PFOS and two of its replacements, PFECHS and FBSA. Using zebrafish embryos, the research assessed apical effects (mortality, morphology, and growth), identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and enriched pathways, and determined transcriptomic points of departure (tPoDs) for each compound. Results indicated that PFOS exhibited the highest relative potency, followed by PFECHS and then FBSA. While similarities were observed among the ranked DEGs across all compounds, over-representation analysis revealed slight differences. Notably, PFOS demonstrated the lowest tPoD identified to date. These findings raise concerns regarding the safety of emerging replacement PFASs and challenge assumptions about PFAS toxicity solely resulting from their accumulative potential. As replacement PFASs proliferate in the environment, this study underscores the need for heightened scrutiny of their effects and questions current regulatory thresholds.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":" ","pages":"18554-18565"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04246","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of per- and poly fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in the environment has prompted restrictions on legacy PFASs due to their recognized toxic effects. Consequently, alternative "replacement" PFASs have been introduced and are prevalent in environmental matrices. Few studies have investigated the molecular effects of both legacy and replacement PFASs under short-term exposures. This study aimed to address this by utilizing transcriptomic sequencing to compare the molecular impacts of exposure to concentrations 0.001-5 mg/L of the legacy PFOS and two of its replacements, PFECHS and FBSA. Using zebrafish embryos, the research assessed apical effects (mortality, morphology, and growth), identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and enriched pathways, and determined transcriptomic points of departure (tPoDs) for each compound. Results indicated that PFOS exhibited the highest relative potency, followed by PFECHS and then FBSA. While similarities were observed among the ranked DEGs across all compounds, over-representation analysis revealed slight differences. Notably, PFOS demonstrated the lowest tPoD identified to date. These findings raise concerns regarding the safety of emerging replacement PFASs and challenge assumptions about PFAS toxicity solely resulting from their accumulative potential. As replacement PFASs proliferate in the environment, this study underscores the need for heightened scrutiny of their effects and questions current regulatory thresholds.

Abstract Image

揭示替代和遗留全氟辛烷磺酸的分子影响:斑马鱼胚胎转录组分析揭示了惊人的相似性和效力。
全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFASs)在环境中的普遍存在促使人们限制传统的全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质,因为它们具有公认的毒性作用。因此,替代性 "替代 "全氟辛烷磺酸被引入,并在环境基质中普遍存在。很少有研究调查了在短期暴露下传统和替代全氟辛烷磺酸的分子效应。本研究旨在利用转录组测序技术,比较暴露于浓度为 0.001-5 mg/L 的传统全氟辛烷磺酸及其两种替代品(PFECHS 和 FBSA)时的分子影响。该研究利用斑马鱼胚胎评估了顶端效应(死亡率、形态和生长),确定了差异表达基因 (DEG) 和富集途径,并确定了每种化合物的转录组出发点 (tPoD)。结果表明,全氟辛烷磺酸的相对效力最高,其次是全氟辛基磺酰氟,然后是全氟丁基磺酰氟。虽然在所有化合物的 DEGs 排序中观察到了相似性,但过度代表性分析显示出了细微差别。值得注意的是,全氟辛烷磺酸的 tPoD 值是迄今为止发现的最低的。这些发现引起了人们对新出现的全氟辛烷磺酸替代品安全性的担忧,并对全氟辛烷磺酸毒性仅由其累积潜力引起的假设提出了质疑。随着替代全氟辛烷磺酸在环境中的扩散,本研究强调了加强对其影响的审查的必要性,并对当前的监管阈值提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信