Evolving Trends in the Management of Duodenal Leaks After Pancreas Transplantation: A Single-Centre Experience.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Transplant International Pub Date : 2024-09-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2024.13302
Samrat Ray, Christian Hobeika, Andrea Norgate, Zaneta Sawicka, Jeffrey Schiff, Gonzalo Sapisochin, Ian D McGilvray, Markus Selzner, Trevor W Reichman, Chaya Shwaartz
{"title":"Evolving Trends in the Management of Duodenal Leaks After Pancreas Transplantation: A Single-Centre Experience.","authors":"Samrat Ray, Christian Hobeika, Andrea Norgate, Zaneta Sawicka, Jeffrey Schiff, Gonzalo Sapisochin, Ian D McGilvray, Markus Selzner, Trevor W Reichman, Chaya Shwaartz","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.13302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Duodenal leaks (DL) contribute to most graft losses following pancreas transplantation. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing graft preservation approach versus upfront graft pancreatectomy in these patients. We reviewed all pancreas transplants performed in our institution between 2000 and 2020 and identified the recipients developing DL to compare based on their management: percutaneous drainage vs. operative graft preservation vs. upfront pancreatectomy. Of the 595 patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, 74 (12.4%) developed a duodenal leak with a median follow up of 108 months. Forty-five (61%) were managed by graft preservation strategies, with the rest being treated with upfront graft pancreatectomy. DL managed by graft preservation strategies had similar graft survival rates at 1 and 5-year compared to the matched cohort of population without DL (95% and 59% vs. 91% and 62%; p = 0.78). Multivariate analysis identified male recipient (OR: OR: 6.18; CI95%: 1.26-41.09; p = 0.04) to have higher odds of undergoing an upfront graft pancreatectomy. In appropriately selected recipients with DL, graft preservation strategies utilizing either interventional radiology guided percutaneous drainage or laparotomy with/without repair of leak can achieve comparable long-term graft survival rates compared to recipients without DL.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.13302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Duodenal leaks (DL) contribute to most graft losses following pancreas transplantation. However, there is a paucity of literature comparing graft preservation approach versus upfront graft pancreatectomy in these patients. We reviewed all pancreas transplants performed in our institution between 2000 and 2020 and identified the recipients developing DL to compare based on their management: percutaneous drainage vs. operative graft preservation vs. upfront pancreatectomy. Of the 595 patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, 74 (12.4%) developed a duodenal leak with a median follow up of 108 months. Forty-five (61%) were managed by graft preservation strategies, with the rest being treated with upfront graft pancreatectomy. DL managed by graft preservation strategies had similar graft survival rates at 1 and 5-year compared to the matched cohort of population without DL (95% and 59% vs. 91% and 62%; p = 0.78). Multivariate analysis identified male recipient (OR: OR: 6.18; CI95%: 1.26-41.09; p = 0.04) to have higher odds of undergoing an upfront graft pancreatectomy. In appropriately selected recipients with DL, graft preservation strategies utilizing either interventional radiology guided percutaneous drainage or laparotomy with/without repair of leak can achieve comparable long-term graft survival rates compared to recipients without DL.

胰腺移植术后十二指肠渗漏处理的演变趋势:单中心经验。
十二指肠渗漏(DL)是胰腺移植后移植物损失的主要原因。然而,在这些患者中,比较移植物保留方法和前期移植物胰腺切除术的文献却很少。我们回顾了 2000 年至 2020 年期间在本院进行的所有胰腺移植手术,并根据其处理方法确定了正在进行 DL 比较的受者:经皮引流与手术移植物保留与前期胰腺切除术。在接受胰腺移植手术的 595 名患者中,有 74 人(12.4%)出现十二指肠漏,中位随访时间为 108 个月。其中45例(61%)采用了移植物保存策略,其余则采用了前期移植物胰腺切除术。与无 DL 的匹配队列相比,采用移植物保存策略的 DL 1 年和 5 年移植物存活率相似(95% 和 59% vs. 91% 和 62%;P = 0.78)。多变量分析发现,男性受者(OR:OR:6.18;CI95%:1.26-41.09;P = 0.04)接受前期移植物胰腺切除术的几率更高。对于经过适当选择的 DL 受者,利用介入放射学引导的经皮引流术或开腹手术加/不加漏孔修补术的移植物保存策略,可获得与无 DL 受者相当的长期移植物存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信