Effect of frailty on unplanned readmission in older adults: A systematic review.

Maryline Bourriquen, Anne-Laure Couderc, Fannie Bretelle, Patrick Villani
{"title":"Effect of frailty on unplanned readmission in older adults: A systematic review.","authors":"Maryline Bourriquen, Anne-Laure Couderc, Fannie Bretelle, Patrick Villani","doi":"10.1016/j.jeph.2024.202774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty and hospital readmissions are two major problems for older people because of their impact on health, quality of life and healthcare systems. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between frailty and unplanned readmissions at 30, 90, 180 days and 1 year in hospitalised older people, and to identify the most relevant tools for assessing readmission risk in different clinical settings to facilitate systematic identification of this high-risk population by healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This review was based on a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCIENCEDIRECT databases for articles published between January 2011 and December 2021 that examined the association between frailty and unplanned readmission in hospitalised adults aged 65 years and over using identified validated tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>44 eligible studies out of 1362 were included in a descriptive analysis. Sixteen countries were represented with older adults hospitalised in medical, surgical, post-acute care and rehabilitation, and emergency departments. Up to 84.5% of frail older adults had an unplanned readmission. Of the 21 tools identified, the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), the Frailty Index (FI), its derivatives, the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the Fried model were the most widely used and relevant tools for identifying the association between frailty and unplanned readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty is widely associated with readmission risk in older adults. The HFRS, FI, CFS and Fried model appear to be the most commonly used tools to assess frailty and prevent unplanned readmissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":517428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of epidemiology and population health","volume":"72 5","pages":"202774"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of epidemiology and population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeph.2024.202774","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Frailty and hospital readmissions are two major problems for older people because of their impact on health, quality of life and healthcare systems. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between frailty and unplanned readmissions at 30, 90, 180 days and 1 year in hospitalised older people, and to identify the most relevant tools for assessing readmission risk in different clinical settings to facilitate systematic identification of this high-risk population by healthcare professionals.

Method: This review was based on a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCIENCEDIRECT databases for articles published between January 2011 and December 2021 that examined the association between frailty and unplanned readmission in hospitalised adults aged 65 years and over using identified validated tools.

Results: 44 eligible studies out of 1362 were included in a descriptive analysis. Sixteen countries were represented with older adults hospitalised in medical, surgical, post-acute care and rehabilitation, and emergency departments. Up to 84.5% of frail older adults had an unplanned readmission. Of the 21 tools identified, the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), the Frailty Index (FI), its derivatives, the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the Fried model were the most widely used and relevant tools for identifying the association between frailty and unplanned readmission.

Conclusion: Frailty is widely associated with readmission risk in older adults. The HFRS, FI, CFS and Fried model appear to be the most commonly used tools to assess frailty and prevent unplanned readmissions.

虚弱对老年人非计划再入院的影响:系统综述。
背景:虚弱和再入院是老年人面临的两大问题,因为它们对健康、生活质量和医疗系统都有影响。本研究旨在调查虚弱与老年人住院 30 天、90 天、180 天和 1 年后非计划再入院之间的关系,并确定在不同临床环境中评估再入院风险的最相关工具,以便医护人员系统地识别这一高风险人群:本综述基于对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 SCIENCEDIRECT 数据库中 2011 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月间发表的文章的系统性检索,这些文章使用已确定的有效工具研究了 65 岁及以上住院成年人的虚弱与计划外再入院之间的关系:在 1362 项符合条件的研究中,有 44 项被纳入描述性分析。16个国家的研究对象包括在内科、外科、急性期后护理和康复科以及急诊科住院的老年人。高达 84.5% 的体弱老年人曾发生过计划外再入院。在已确定的 21 种工具中,医院虚弱风险评分(HFRS)、虚弱指数(FI)及其衍生物、临床虚弱量表(CFS)和弗里德模型是在确定虚弱与非计划再入院之间的关联方面使用最广泛、最相关的工具:结论:虚弱与老年人再入院风险有广泛关联。结论:虚弱与老年人再入院风险广泛相关,HFRS、FI、CFS 和弗里德模型似乎是评估虚弱和预防意外再入院最常用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信