Tim Niehues, Sandra von Hardenberg, Eunike Velleuer
{"title":"Rapid identification of primary atopic disorders (PAD) by a clinical landmark-guided, upfront use of genomic sequencing.","authors":"Tim Niehues, Sandra von Hardenberg, Eunike Velleuer","doi":"10.5414/ALX02520E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Primary atopic disorders (PAD) are monogenic disorders caused by pathogenic gene variants encoding proteins that are key for the maintenance of a healthy skin barrier and a well-functioning immune system. Physicians face the challenge to find single, extremely rare PAD patients/families among the millions of individuals with common allergic diseases. We describe case scenarios with signature PAD. We review the literature and deduct specific clinical red flags for PAD detection. They include a positive family history and/or signs of pathological susceptibility to infections, immunodysregulation, or syndromic disease. Results of conventional laboratory and most immunological lab studies are not sufficient to make a definitive diagnosis of PAD. In the past, multistep narrowing of differential diagnoses by various immunological and other laboratory tests led to testing of single genes or gene panel analyses, which was a time-consuming and often unsuccessful approach. The implementation of whole-genomic analyses in the routine diagnostics has led to a paradigm shift. Upfront genome-wide analysis by whole genome sequencing (WGS) will shorten the time to diagnosis, save patients from unnecessary investigations, and reduce morbidity and mortality. We propose a rational, clinical landmark-based approach for deciding which cases pass the filter for carrying out early WGS. WGS result interpretation requires a great deal of caution regarding the causal relationship of variants in PAD phenotypes and absence of proof by adequate functional tests. In case of negative WGS results, a re-iteration attitude with re-analyses of the data (using the latest data base annotation)) may eventually lead to PAD diagnosis. PAD, like many other rare genetic diseases, will only be successfully managed, if physicians from different clinical specialties and geneticists interact regularly in multidisciplinary conferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":101298,"journal":{"name":"Allergologie select","volume":"8 ","pages":"304-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologie select","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02520E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Primary atopic disorders (PAD) are monogenic disorders caused by pathogenic gene variants encoding proteins that are key for the maintenance of a healthy skin barrier and a well-functioning immune system. Physicians face the challenge to find single, extremely rare PAD patients/families among the millions of individuals with common allergic diseases. We describe case scenarios with signature PAD. We review the literature and deduct specific clinical red flags for PAD detection. They include a positive family history and/or signs of pathological susceptibility to infections, immunodysregulation, or syndromic disease. Results of conventional laboratory and most immunological lab studies are not sufficient to make a definitive diagnosis of PAD. In the past, multistep narrowing of differential diagnoses by various immunological and other laboratory tests led to testing of single genes or gene panel analyses, which was a time-consuming and often unsuccessful approach. The implementation of whole-genomic analyses in the routine diagnostics has led to a paradigm shift. Upfront genome-wide analysis by whole genome sequencing (WGS) will shorten the time to diagnosis, save patients from unnecessary investigations, and reduce morbidity and mortality. We propose a rational, clinical landmark-based approach for deciding which cases pass the filter for carrying out early WGS. WGS result interpretation requires a great deal of caution regarding the causal relationship of variants in PAD phenotypes and absence of proof by adequate functional tests. In case of negative WGS results, a re-iteration attitude with re-analyses of the data (using the latest data base annotation)) may eventually lead to PAD diagnosis. PAD, like many other rare genetic diseases, will only be successfully managed, if physicians from different clinical specialties and geneticists interact regularly in multidisciplinary conferences.
原发性特应性疾病(PAD)是由编码蛋白质的致病基因变异引起的单基因疾病,这些蛋白质是维持健康皮肤屏障和功能良好的免疫系统的关键。在数百万常见过敏性疾病患者中,医生们面临着寻找单个、极其罕见的 PAD 患者/家庭的挑战。我们描述了具有特征性 PAD 的病例。我们回顾了相关文献,并提出了检测 PAD 的特定临床信号。其中包括阳性家族史和/或病理易感性、免疫调节或综合症的迹象。常规实验室检查和大多数免疫学实验室检查的结果不足以明确诊断 PAD。过去,通过各种免疫学和其他实验室检查来缩小鉴别诊断的范围,需要进行单个基因或基因组分析,这种方法耗时且往往不成功。全基因组分析在常规诊断中的应用带来了模式的转变。全基因组测序(WGS)的前期全基因组分析将缩短诊断时间,使患者免于不必要的检查,并降低发病率和死亡率。我们提出了一种基于临床地标的合理方法,用于决定哪些病例通过了早期 WGS 的筛选。对于 PAD 表型中变异的因果关系以及缺乏适当功能测试证明的情况,WGS 结果的解释需要非常谨慎。在 WGS 结果为阴性的情况下,通过对数据的重新分析(使用最新的数据库注释)进行再次验证,最终可能会导致 PAD 的诊断。与许多其他罕见遗传病一样,只有来自不同临床专科的医生和遗传学家定期在多学科会议上进行交流,才能成功治疗 PAD。