Christopher Y. Leon-Valdivieso, Audrey Bethry, Coline Pinese, Michèle Dai, Christian Pompee, Jean-Marc Pernot, Xavier Garric
{"title":"Engineering Shape to Overcome Contraction: The Role of Polymer–Collagen Hybrids in Advanced Dermal Substitutes","authors":"Christopher Y. Leon-Valdivieso, Audrey Bethry, Coline Pinese, Michèle Dai, Christian Pompee, Jean-Marc Pernot, Xavier Garric","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.37805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Collagen gels are the standard dermal equivalents par excellence, however the problem of rapid cell-mediated contraction remains unresolved. Therefore, the development of hybrid constructs (HCs) based on collagen and polymeric scaffolds is proposed to address the mechanical instability that usually limits the formation of new, functional tissue. Equally important, these synthetic structures should be temporary (degradable) while ensuring that cells are well-adapted to the new extracellular environment. In this study, we screened a library of scaffolds made of various polymers, including homopolymers of polycaprolactone (PCL) and poly D,L-lactide (PLA<sub>50</sub>), their blends (PCL/PLA<sub>50</sub>), and copolymers (poly(D,L-lactide-<i>co</i>-caprolactone), PCLLA<sub>50</sub>) to prepare HCs in a layer-by-layer fashion. The properties of polymers and copolymers along with their processability by electrospinning and 3D-printing were evaluated. Then, we assessed the HCs resistance toward cell-mediated contraction as well as the degradation of the polymeric scaffolds. Our results indicate that scaffolds with higher PLA<sub>50</sub> content (e.g., PLA<sub>50</sub> 100%, PCL/PLA<sub>50</sub> or PCLLA<sub>50</sub>, both at 50/50 caprolactone-to-D,L-lactide molar ratio) presented more drawbacks in terms of handleability and processing, while those with greater PCL presence showed structural steadiness and ease to use. All the scaffolds integrated well with the collagen gel to form the corresponding HCs. With few exceptions, the HCs demonstrated good resistance to cell-derived contraction over 3 weeks. Notably, HCs based on PCLLA<sub>50</sub> 90/10 (both versions, electrospun or 3D-printed) performed best, showing only a 5%–17% area reduction compared to the 93% observed in collagen-only gels. This copolymer displayed hydrolytic degradation depending on its shape, with up to 45% and 65% loss of molecular weight for the electrospun and 3D-printed forms, respectively, correlating with their progressive change in mechanical features. HCs containing PCLLA<sub>50</sub> 90/10 also exhibited a better fibroblast distribution, enhanced myofibroblastic differentiation, and a three-fold increase in cell proliferation (when the electrospun type was used) compared to collagen controls. These findings were instrumental in selecting a potential HC that might be used for future experiments in vivo.</p>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.a.37805","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.37805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Collagen gels are the standard dermal equivalents par excellence, however the problem of rapid cell-mediated contraction remains unresolved. Therefore, the development of hybrid constructs (HCs) based on collagen and polymeric scaffolds is proposed to address the mechanical instability that usually limits the formation of new, functional tissue. Equally important, these synthetic structures should be temporary (degradable) while ensuring that cells are well-adapted to the new extracellular environment. In this study, we screened a library of scaffolds made of various polymers, including homopolymers of polycaprolactone (PCL) and poly D,L-lactide (PLA50), their blends (PCL/PLA50), and copolymers (poly(D,L-lactide-co-caprolactone), PCLLA50) to prepare HCs in a layer-by-layer fashion. The properties of polymers and copolymers along with their processability by electrospinning and 3D-printing were evaluated. Then, we assessed the HCs resistance toward cell-mediated contraction as well as the degradation of the polymeric scaffolds. Our results indicate that scaffolds with higher PLA50 content (e.g., PLA50 100%, PCL/PLA50 or PCLLA50, both at 50/50 caprolactone-to-D,L-lactide molar ratio) presented more drawbacks in terms of handleability and processing, while those with greater PCL presence showed structural steadiness and ease to use. All the scaffolds integrated well with the collagen gel to form the corresponding HCs. With few exceptions, the HCs demonstrated good resistance to cell-derived contraction over 3 weeks. Notably, HCs based on PCLLA50 90/10 (both versions, electrospun or 3D-printed) performed best, showing only a 5%–17% area reduction compared to the 93% observed in collagen-only gels. This copolymer displayed hydrolytic degradation depending on its shape, with up to 45% and 65% loss of molecular weight for the electrospun and 3D-printed forms, respectively, correlating with their progressive change in mechanical features. HCs containing PCLLA50 90/10 also exhibited a better fibroblast distribution, enhanced myofibroblastic differentiation, and a three-fold increase in cell proliferation (when the electrospun type was used) compared to collagen controls. These findings were instrumental in selecting a potential HC that might be used for future experiments in vivo.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A is an international, interdisciplinary, English-language publication of original contributions concerning studies of the preparation, performance, and evaluation of biomaterials; the chemical, physical, toxicological, and mechanical behavior of materials in physiological environments; and the response of blood and tissues to biomaterials. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all relevant biomaterial topics including the science and technology of alloys,polymers, ceramics, and reprocessed animal and human tissues in surgery,dentistry, artificial organs, and other medical devices. The Journal also publishes articles in interdisciplinary areas such as tissue engineering and controlled release technology where biomaterials play a significant role in the performance of the medical device.
The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research is the official journal of the Society for Biomaterials (USA), the Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials.
Articles are welcomed from all scientists. Membership in the Society for Biomaterials is not a prerequisite for submission.