Global regulatory policies for animal biotechnology: overview, opportunities and challenges.

IF 4.9 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in genome editing Pub Date : 2024-09-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgeed.2024.1467080
Diane Wray-Cahen, Eric Hallerman, Mark Tizard
{"title":"Global regulatory policies for animal biotechnology: overview, opportunities and challenges.","authors":"Diane Wray-Cahen, Eric Hallerman, Mark Tizard","doi":"10.3389/fgeed.2024.1467080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genome editing (GnEd) has the potential to provide many benefits to animal agriculture, offering a means for achieving rapid growth, disease resistance, and novel phenotypes. The technology has the potential to be useful for rapidly incorporating traits into existing selectively bred animals without the need for crossbreeding and backcrossing. Yet only four products from animals created via biotechnology, all growth-enhanced fishes, have reached commercialization and only on a limited scale. The past failure of genetically engineered (or GM) products to reach conventional producers can largely be attributed to the high cost of meeting GMO regulatory requirements. We review the history of GMO regulations internationally, noting the influence of Codex Alimentarius on the development of many existing regulatory frameworks. We highlight new regulatory approaches for GnEd organisms, first developed by Argentina, and the adoption of similar approaches by other countries. Such new regulatory approaches allow GnEd organisms that could have been developed by conventional means to be regulated under the same rules as conventional organisms and in the future is likely to enhance the opportunity for biotech animals to enter production. Treating certain GnEd products as conventional has had a large impact on the variety of biotechnological innovations successfully navigating regulatory processes. We suggest that for the full potential of GnEd technologies to be realized, enabling public policies are needed to facilitate use of GnEd as a breeding tool to incorporate new traits within existing animal breeding programs, rather than only a tool to create distinct new products.</p>","PeriodicalId":73086,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in genome editing","volume":"6 ","pages":"1467080"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11459211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in genome editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2024.1467080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genome editing (GnEd) has the potential to provide many benefits to animal agriculture, offering a means for achieving rapid growth, disease resistance, and novel phenotypes. The technology has the potential to be useful for rapidly incorporating traits into existing selectively bred animals without the need for crossbreeding and backcrossing. Yet only four products from animals created via biotechnology, all growth-enhanced fishes, have reached commercialization and only on a limited scale. The past failure of genetically engineered (or GM) products to reach conventional producers can largely be attributed to the high cost of meeting GMO regulatory requirements. We review the history of GMO regulations internationally, noting the influence of Codex Alimentarius on the development of many existing regulatory frameworks. We highlight new regulatory approaches for GnEd organisms, first developed by Argentina, and the adoption of similar approaches by other countries. Such new regulatory approaches allow GnEd organisms that could have been developed by conventional means to be regulated under the same rules as conventional organisms and in the future is likely to enhance the opportunity for biotech animals to enter production. Treating certain GnEd products as conventional has had a large impact on the variety of biotechnological innovations successfully navigating regulatory processes. We suggest that for the full potential of GnEd technologies to be realized, enabling public policies are needed to facilitate use of GnEd as a breeding tool to incorporate new traits within existing animal breeding programs, rather than only a tool to create distinct new products.

全球动物生物技术监管政策:概述、机遇与挑战。
基因组编辑(GnEd)有可能为畜牧业带来许多益处,提供一种实现快速生长、抗病和新表型的手段。该技术有可能在无需杂交和回交的情况下,将性状快速融入现有的选育动物中。然而,目前只有四种通过生物技术培育的动物产品实现了商业化,而且规模有限,均为生长增强型鱼类。转基因产品过去未能进入传统生产商的视野,在很大程度上归因于满足转基因生物监管要求的高昂成本。我们回顾了国际转基因生物监管的历史,注意到《食品法典》对许多现有监管框架发展的影响。我们强调了阿根廷首先制定的针对转基因生物的新监管方法,以及其他国家对类似方法的采用。这种新的监管方法使本可通过传统方法开发的 GnEd 生物在与传统生物相同的规则下接受监管,未来很可能会增加生物技术动物进入生产领域的机会。将某些 GnEd 产品视为常规产品对成功通过监管程序的各种生物技术创新产生了很大影响。我们建议,为充分发挥 GnEd 技术的潜力,需要制定有利的公共政策,促进将 GnEd 作为育种工具,将新性状纳入现有的动物育种计划,而不仅仅是作为创造独特新产品的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信