Differential diagnosis between low-risk and high-risk thymoma: Comparison of diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without deep learning model.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica open Pub Date : 2024-10-04 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1177/20584601241288509
Yuriko Yoshida, Masahiro Yanagawa, Yukihisa Sato, Tomo Miyata, Atsushi Kawata, Akinori Hata, Noriyuki Tomiyama
{"title":"Differential diagnosis between low-risk and high-risk thymoma: Comparison of diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without deep learning model.","authors":"Yuriko Yoshida, Masahiro Yanagawa, Yukihisa Sato, Tomo Miyata, Atsushi Kawata, Akinori Hata, Noriyuki Tomiyama","doi":"10.1177/20584601241288509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are few CT-based deep learning (DL) studies on thymoma according to the World Health Organization classification.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a CT-based DL model to distinguish between low-risk and high-risk thymoma and to compare the diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without the DL model.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>159 patients with 160 thymomas were included. A fine-tuning VGG16 network model with Adam optimizer was used, followed by k-fold cross validation. The dataset consisted of three axial slices, including the maximum tumor size from the CT volume data. The data were augmented 50 times by rotation, zoom, shear, and horizontal/vertical flip. Three independent networks for the CT dataset were considered, and the result was determined by voting. Three radiologists independently diagnosed thymomas with and without the model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the diagnostic performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accuracy of the DL model was 71.3%. Diagnostic performance of the radiologists was as follows: AUC and accuracy without the DL model, 0.61-0.68 and 61.9%-69.3%; and with the DL model, 0.66-0.69 and 68.1%-70.0%, respectively. AUC of the diagnostic performance showed no significant differences between radiologists with and without the DL model. The DL model tended to increase the diagnostic accuracy, but AUC was not significantly improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diagnostic performance of the DL was comparable to that of radiologists. The DL model assistance tended to increase diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72063,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20584601241288509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are few CT-based deep learning (DL) studies on thymoma according to the World Health Organization classification.

Purpose: To develop a CT-based DL model to distinguish between low-risk and high-risk thymoma and to compare the diagnostic performance of radiologists with and without the DL model.

Material and methods: 159 patients with 160 thymomas were included. A fine-tuning VGG16 network model with Adam optimizer was used, followed by k-fold cross validation. The dataset consisted of three axial slices, including the maximum tumor size from the CT volume data. The data were augmented 50 times by rotation, zoom, shear, and horizontal/vertical flip. Three independent networks for the CT dataset were considered, and the result was determined by voting. Three radiologists independently diagnosed thymomas with and without the model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the diagnostic performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: Accuracy of the DL model was 71.3%. Diagnostic performance of the radiologists was as follows: AUC and accuracy without the DL model, 0.61-0.68 and 61.9%-69.3%; and with the DL model, 0.66-0.69 and 68.1%-70.0%, respectively. AUC of the diagnostic performance showed no significant differences between radiologists with and without the DL model. The DL model tended to increase the diagnostic accuracy, but AUC was not significantly improved.

Conclusion: Diagnostic performance of the DL was comparable to that of radiologists. The DL model assistance tended to increase diagnostic accuracy.

低风险和高风险胸腺瘤的鉴别诊断:使用深度学习模型和不使用深度学习模型的放射科医生诊断效果比较。
背景:目的:开发一种基于 CT 的深度学习(DL)模型,用于区分低风险和高风险胸腺瘤,并比较放射科医生使用和不使用 DL 模型的诊断性能。使用亚当优化器对 VGG16 网络模型进行微调,然后进行 k 倍交叉验证。数据集由三个轴切片组成,包括 CT 容量数据中肿瘤的最大尺寸。数据通过旋转、缩放、剪切和水平/垂直翻转增强了 50 倍。CT 数据集有三个独立的网络,结果由投票决定。三名放射科医生分别使用和不使用该模型独立诊断胸腺瘤。使用接收器操作特征分析比较了诊断性能的曲线下面积(AUC):结果:DL模型的准确率为71.3%。放射科医生的诊断结果如下:不使用 DL 模型的 AUC 和准确率分别为 0.61-0.68 和 61.9%-69.3%;使用 DL 模型的 AUC 和准确率分别为 0.66-0.69 和 68.1%-70.0%。使用和未使用 DL 模型的放射科医生的诊断性能 AUC 没有明显差异。DL模型倾向于提高诊断准确率,但AUC并没有明显改善:结论:DL的诊断性能与放射科医生的诊断性能相当。结论:DL 的诊断性能与放射科医生的诊断性能相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信