Incorporating sex and gender considerations in research on psychosocial work exposures and cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review of 55 prospective studies

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with disparities observed between males and females. Psychosocial work exposures (PWE), including workload, job control, reward and long working hours, are associated with CVD development. Despite higher prevalence among females, the association with CVD is consistently observed in males, with limited explanations for these differences. This study aimed to examine the consideration of sex and gender in prospective studies within systematic reviews on PWE — specifically, the demand-control model, the effort-reward imbalance model, and long working hours — and CVD. Conducting a systematic review, we assessed sex and gender considerations using criteria from the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines. While most studies recognized potential sex and gender differences in the associations between PWE and CVD, only about half of the 28 studies that included both sexes (15 studies) analyzed females and males separately. Moreover, few studies included criteria for sex- and gender-based analyses. Less than half of the studies (23 studies) incorporated a sex and/or gender perspective to discuss observed differences and similarities between men and women. Although there is a rising trend in integrating sex and gender considerations, significant gaps persist in methodologies and reporting, highlighting the need for comprehensive incorporation of sex and gender considerations to bolster CVD prevention strategies and policies.