Socioeconomic inequalities in dementia risk among a population-based cohort: Quantifying the role of a broad combination of lifestyle factors.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Ze Zhao, Xiaoxv Yin, Minzhi Xu
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequalities in dementia risk among a population-based cohort: Quantifying the role of a broad combination of lifestyle factors.","authors":"Ze Zhao, Xiaoxv Yin, Minzhi Xu","doi":"10.1093/geronb/gbae173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The complex associations of socioeconomic status (SES) and lifestyle with dementia are unclear. Our objective was to examine whether a broad combination of lifestyle factors mediates the associations of SES with incident dementia and the extent of interaction or joint relations of lifestyles and SES with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 274,871 participants from the UK Biobank were included. SES was assessed using the Townsend Deprivation Index. A lifestyle index was created based on smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, social connections, sleep duration, diet, and sedentary behavior. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted. Mediation and interaction analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between lifestyles and SES in dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HRs (95% CIs) for when participants with low SES were compared with participants of high SES were 1.32 (1.22-1.42) for all-cause dementia, 1.25 (1.11-1.40) for Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 1.61 (1.37-1.90) for vascular dementia (VD). Lifestyles explained ≤ 7.8% of socioeconomic disparities in dementia. Unhealthy lifestyle categories were associated with a higher risk of dementia and its subtypes across all SES levels. The HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause dementia, AD, and VD comparing participants with low SES and the least healthy lifestyle versus those with high SES and the healthiest lifestyle were 1.82 (1.56-2.11), 1.51 (1.20-1.90), and 2.56 (1.81-3.61), respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adhering to a healthy lifestyle may prevent dementia across all socioeconomic groups, but socioeconomic inequalities in dementia cannot be fully addressed by promoting healthy lifestyles alone. The social determinants of dementia need to be better addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":56111,"journal":{"name":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbae173","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The complex associations of socioeconomic status (SES) and lifestyle with dementia are unclear. Our objective was to examine whether a broad combination of lifestyle factors mediates the associations of SES with incident dementia and the extent of interaction or joint relations of lifestyles and SES with dementia.

Methods: A total of 274,871 participants from the UK Biobank were included. SES was assessed using the Townsend Deprivation Index. A lifestyle index was created based on smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, social connections, sleep duration, diet, and sedentary behavior. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted. Mediation and interaction analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between lifestyles and SES in dementia.

Results: The HRs (95% CIs) for when participants with low SES were compared with participants of high SES were 1.32 (1.22-1.42) for all-cause dementia, 1.25 (1.11-1.40) for Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 1.61 (1.37-1.90) for vascular dementia (VD). Lifestyles explained ≤ 7.8% of socioeconomic disparities in dementia. Unhealthy lifestyle categories were associated with a higher risk of dementia and its subtypes across all SES levels. The HRs (95% CIs) for all-cause dementia, AD, and VD comparing participants with low SES and the least healthy lifestyle versus those with high SES and the healthiest lifestyle were 1.82 (1.56-2.11), 1.51 (1.20-1.90), and 2.56 (1.81-3.61), respectively.

Discussion: Adhering to a healthy lifestyle may prevent dementia across all socioeconomic groups, but socioeconomic inequalities in dementia cannot be fully addressed by promoting healthy lifestyles alone. The social determinants of dementia need to be better addressed.

人群中痴呆症风险的社会经济不平等:量化各种生活方式因素的作用。
目的:社会经济地位(SES)和生活方式与痴呆症之间的复杂关系尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究生活方式因素的广泛组合是否介导了社会经济地位与痴呆症的关联,以及生活方式和社会经济地位与痴呆症的相互作用或共同关系的程度:方法:共纳入英国生物库中的 274,871 名参与者。SES采用汤森贫困指数进行评估。根据吸烟状况、饮酒量、体力活动、社会关系、睡眠时间、饮食和久坐行为创建了生活方式指数。采用 Cox 比例危险模型进行拟合。进行了中介分析和交互分析,以探讨痴呆症患者的生活方式与社会经济地位之间的关系:与高社会经济地位参与者相比,低社会经济地位参与者患全因痴呆症的HRs(95% CIs)为1.32(1.22-1.42),患阿尔茨海默病(AD)的HRs为1.25(1.11-1.40),患血管性痴呆症(VD)的HRs为1.61(1.37-1.90)。在痴呆症的社会经济差异中,生活方式解释了≤ 7.8%的差异。在所有社会经济地位水平中,不健康的生活方式与痴呆症及其亚型的较高风险相关。社会经济地位低、生活方式最不健康的参与者与社会经济地位高、生活方式最健康的参与者相比,全因痴呆、注意力缺失症和视力障碍的HRs(95% CIs)分别为1.82(1.56-2.11)、1.51(1.20-1.90)和2.56(1.81-3.61):讨论:坚持健康的生活方式可预防所有社会经济群体的痴呆症,但仅靠提倡健康的生活方式并不能完全解决痴呆症的社会经济不平等问题。需要更好地解决痴呆症的社会决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.10%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences publishes articles on development in adulthood and old age that advance the psychological science of aging processes and outcomes. Articles have clear implications for theoretical or methodological innovation in the psychology of aging or contribute significantly to the empirical understanding of psychological processes and aging. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to, attitudes, clinical applications, cognition, education, emotion, health, human factors, interpersonal relations, neuropsychology, perception, personality, physiological psychology, social psychology, and sensation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信