Review of the facilitators and barriers to adoption of biofortified foods and food products.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Samantha L Huey, Saiful Islam, Neel H Mehta, Elsa M Konieczynski, Valerie M Friesen, Jesse T Krisher, Mduduzi N N Mbuya, Eva C Monterrosa, Annette M Nyangaresi, Saurabh Mehta
{"title":"Review of the facilitators and barriers to adoption of biofortified foods and food products.","authors":"Samantha L Huey, Saiful Islam, Neel H Mehta, Elsa M Konieczynski, Valerie M Friesen, Jesse T Krisher, Mduduzi N N Mbuya, Eva C Monterrosa, Annette M Nyangaresi, Saurabh Mehta","doi":"10.1017/S0954422424000258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biofortification - the process of increasing the concentrations of essential nutrients in staple crops - is a means of addressing the burden of micronutrient deficiencies at a population level via existing food systems, such as smallholder farms. To realise its potential for global impact, we need to understand the factors that are associated with decisions to adopt biofortified crops and food products. We searched the literature to identify adoption determinants, i.e. barriers to (factors negatively associated) or facilitators of (factors positively associated) adoption, of biofortified crops and food products. We found 41 studies reporting facilitator(s) and/or barrier(s) of adoption. We categorised the factors using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research 2.0, resulting in a set of factors that enable or constrain adoption of biofortified foods across twenty-four constructs and five domains of this meta-theoretical determinant framework from implementation science. Facilitators of orange sweet potato adoption included knowledge about importance, relative advantage, efficient production and management practices; barriers included lacking timely access to quality vines and market remoteness (28 studies total). Facilitators of vitamin A cassava adoption included awareness of its benefits and access to information; barriers included poor road networks and scarcity of improved technology including inadequate processing/storage facilities (8). Facilitators of high-iron bean adoption included farmers' networking and high farming experience; barriers included low knowledge of bean biofortification (8). Barriers to vitamin A maize adoption included low awareness and concerns regarding yield, texture and aflatoxin contamination (1). These barriers and facilitators may be a starting point for researchers to move towards testing implementation strategies and/or for policymakers to consider before planning scale-up and continuous optimisation of ongoing projects promoting adoption of biofortified crops and food products.</p>","PeriodicalId":54703,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422424000258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biofortification - the process of increasing the concentrations of essential nutrients in staple crops - is a means of addressing the burden of micronutrient deficiencies at a population level via existing food systems, such as smallholder farms. To realise its potential for global impact, we need to understand the factors that are associated with decisions to adopt biofortified crops and food products. We searched the literature to identify adoption determinants, i.e. barriers to (factors negatively associated) or facilitators of (factors positively associated) adoption, of biofortified crops and food products. We found 41 studies reporting facilitator(s) and/or barrier(s) of adoption. We categorised the factors using the Consolidated Framework of Implementation Research 2.0, resulting in a set of factors that enable or constrain adoption of biofortified foods across twenty-four constructs and five domains of this meta-theoretical determinant framework from implementation science. Facilitators of orange sweet potato adoption included knowledge about importance, relative advantage, efficient production and management practices; barriers included lacking timely access to quality vines and market remoteness (28 studies total). Facilitators of vitamin A cassava adoption included awareness of its benefits and access to information; barriers included poor road networks and scarcity of improved technology including inadequate processing/storage facilities (8). Facilitators of high-iron bean adoption included farmers' networking and high farming experience; barriers included low knowledge of bean biofortification (8). Barriers to vitamin A maize adoption included low awareness and concerns regarding yield, texture and aflatoxin contamination (1). These barriers and facilitators may be a starting point for researchers to move towards testing implementation strategies and/or for policymakers to consider before planning scale-up and continuous optimisation of ongoing projects promoting adoption of biofortified crops and food products.

审查采用生物强化食品和食品的促进因素和障碍。
生物强化--提高主食作物中必需营养素浓度的过程--是通过现有粮食系统(如小农农场)解决人口微量营养素缺乏问题的一种手段。为了实现其全球影响的潜力,我们需要了解与决定采用生物强化作物和食品相关的因素。我们对文献进行了检索,以确定采用生物强化作物和食品的决定因素,即采用生物强化作物和食品的障碍(负相关因素)或促进因素(正相关因素)。我们发现有 41 项研究报告了采用的促进因素和/或障碍。我们使用 "实施研究综合框架 2.0 "对这些因素进行了分类,从而得出了一系列促进或制约采用生物强化食品的因素,这些因素涉及实施科学元理论决定因素框架的 24 个结构和 5 个领域。采用橙色甘薯的促进因素包括对重要性的认识、相对优势、高效生产和管理方法;障碍包括无法及时获得优质藤蔓和市场偏远(共 28 项研究)。采用维生素 A 木薯的促进因素包括对其益处的认识和信息的获取;障碍包括道路网络不完善和改良技术稀缺,包括加工/储存设施不足(8 项研究)。采用高铁豆的促进因素包括农民网络和丰富的耕作经验;障碍包括对豆类生物强化的认识不足(8)。采用维生素 A 玉米的障碍包括认识不足以及对产量、质地和黄曲霉毒素污染的担忧(1)。这些障碍和促进因素可以作为一个起点,供研究人员在计划推广和不断优化正在进行的促进采用生物强化作物和食品的项目之前,着手测试实施战略和/或供政策制定者考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition Research Reviews
Nutrition Research Reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
1.80%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research Reviews offers a comprehensive overview of nutritional science today. By distilling the latest research and linking it to established practice, the journal consistently delivers the widest range of in-depth articles in the field of nutritional science. It presents up-to-date, critical reviews of key topics in nutrition science advancing new concepts and hypotheses that encourage the exchange of fundamental ideas on nutritional well-being in both humans and animals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信