Implementation study of the CARRA Uveitis Consensus Treatment Plans: feasibility for clinical practice and applicability for research.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Margaret H Chang, Fatima Barbar-Smiley, Shoghik Akoghlanian, Joanne Drew, Sheila T Angeles-Han, Megan Quinlan-Waters, John F Bohnsack, Ashley M Cooper, Barbara Edelheit, Jennifer Twachtman-Bassett, Melissa A Lerman, Kabita Nanda, C Egla Rabinovich, Mindy S Lo
{"title":"Implementation study of the CARRA Uveitis Consensus Treatment Plans: feasibility for clinical practice and applicability for research.","authors":"Margaret H Chang, Fatima Barbar-Smiley, Shoghik Akoghlanian, Joanne Drew, Sheila T Angeles-Han, Megan Quinlan-Waters, John F Bohnsack, Ashley M Cooper, Barbara Edelheit, Jennifer Twachtman-Bassett, Melissa A Lerman, Kabita Nanda, C Egla Rabinovich, Mindy S Lo","doi":"10.1186/s12969-024-01022-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) carries a significant risk for eye complications and vision loss. The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) introduced consensus treatment plans (CTPs) to standardize treatment for CAU and facilitate future comparative effectiveness studies. Two CTPs were developed to address: 1) initiation of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with CAU naïve to steroid-sparing therapy, and 2) initiation of a TNF inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with severe uveitis or uveitis refractory to MTX. We evaluated implementation of the uveitis CTPs using existing CARRA Registry infrastructure and assessed feasibility of the CTPs for comparative effectiveness research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at nine pilot sites between February 2020 and August 2022. Patients with JIA-associated CAU (JIA-U) were treated according to either the MTX or TNFi CTP. Uveitis activity and medication use were recorded at 0, 3, and 6 months. We assessed patient enrollment rates, CTP arm selection, uveitis control, and quality of data collection. We also evaluated CTP arm selection in a retrospective cohort of similar JIA-U patients enrolled in the CARRA Registry during the same study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen patients were included in the pilot cohort. Eight were treated with the MTX CTP (4 oral MTX, 4 subcutaneous MTX), and 9 with the TNFi CTP (9 received standard-dose adalimumab, none selected high-dose adalimumab or infliximab). Uveitis was controlled in 13 of 17 patients by 6 months. Query of the CARRA-wide Registry identified 42 patients with JIA-U who were treated according to the MTX or TNFi CTPs. Among these, 26 were treated with MTX (8 oral, 18 subcutaneous) and 16 with TNFi (12 standard dose adalimumab, 2 high dose adalimumab, and 2 infliximab).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the MTX and TNFi uveitis CTPs can practically be implemented in clinical settings and are currently being utilized across Registry sites. However, in patients starting TNFi therapy, all pilot study participants and most patients across the CARRA Registry were treated with a standard dose of adalimumab. This consensus on the treatment approach underscores its broad acceptance but also limits the applicability of the uveitis TNFi CTP for comparative effectiveness research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54630,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Rheumatology","volume":"22 1","pages":"88"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457454/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-024-01022-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic anterior uveitis (CAU) carries a significant risk for eye complications and vision loss. The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) introduced consensus treatment plans (CTPs) to standardize treatment for CAU and facilitate future comparative effectiveness studies. Two CTPs were developed to address: 1) initiation of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with CAU naïve to steroid-sparing therapy, and 2) initiation of a TNF inhibitor (TNFi) in patients with severe uveitis or uveitis refractory to MTX. We evaluated implementation of the uveitis CTPs using existing CARRA Registry infrastructure and assessed feasibility of the CTPs for comparative effectiveness research.

Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at nine pilot sites between February 2020 and August 2022. Patients with JIA-associated CAU (JIA-U) were treated according to either the MTX or TNFi CTP. Uveitis activity and medication use were recorded at 0, 3, and 6 months. We assessed patient enrollment rates, CTP arm selection, uveitis control, and quality of data collection. We also evaluated CTP arm selection in a retrospective cohort of similar JIA-U patients enrolled in the CARRA Registry during the same study period.

Results: Seventeen patients were included in the pilot cohort. Eight were treated with the MTX CTP (4 oral MTX, 4 subcutaneous MTX), and 9 with the TNFi CTP (9 received standard-dose adalimumab, none selected high-dose adalimumab or infliximab). Uveitis was controlled in 13 of 17 patients by 6 months. Query of the CARRA-wide Registry identified 42 patients with JIA-U who were treated according to the MTX or TNFi CTPs. Among these, 26 were treated with MTX (8 oral, 18 subcutaneous) and 16 with TNFi (12 standard dose adalimumab, 2 high dose adalimumab, and 2 infliximab).

Conclusion: Both the MTX and TNFi uveitis CTPs can practically be implemented in clinical settings and are currently being utilized across Registry sites. However, in patients starting TNFi therapy, all pilot study participants and most patients across the CARRA Registry were treated with a standard dose of adalimumab. This consensus on the treatment approach underscores its broad acceptance but also limits the applicability of the uveitis TNFi CTP for comparative effectiveness research.

CARRA 葡萄膜炎共识治疗计划的实施研究:临床实践的可行性和研究的适用性。
背景:慢性前葡萄膜炎(CAU慢性前葡萄膜炎(CAU)具有眼部并发症和视力丧失的重大风险。儿童关节炎和风湿病学研究联盟(CARRA)推出了共识治疗计划(CTPs),以规范慢性前葡萄膜炎的治疗,促进未来的比较效益研究。针对以下问题制定了两个 CTP:1) 对未接受类固醇保留疗法的 CAU 患者开始使用甲氨蝶呤 (MTX),以及 2) 对严重葡萄膜炎或 MTX 难治性葡萄膜炎患者开始使用 TNF 抑制剂 (TNFi)。我们利用现有的 CARRA 登记基础设施评估了葡萄膜炎 CTPs 的实施情况,并评估了 CTPs 在比较有效性研究中的可行性:这项前瞻性观察性队列研究于 2020 年 2 月至 2022 年 8 月期间在 9 个试点医院进行。JIA相关CAU(JIA-U)患者接受MTX或TNFi CTP治疗。在0、3和6个月时记录葡萄膜炎活动和用药情况。我们评估了患者的入组率、CTP治疗组的选择、葡萄膜炎的控制情况以及数据收集的质量。我们还评估了同一研究期间CARRA登记处登记的类似JIA-U患者的回顾性队列中CTP臂的选择情况:17名患者被纳入试点队列。8人接受了MTX CTP治疗(4人口服MTX,4人皮下注射MTX),9人接受了TNFi CTP治疗(9人接受了标准剂量的阿达木单抗,没有人选择高剂量阿达木单抗或英夫利西单抗)。17名患者中有13人的葡萄膜炎在6个月后得到控制。通过查询整个CARRA登记处,发现有42名U型JIA患者接受了MTX或TNFi CTPs治疗。其中,26例接受了MTX治疗(8例口服,18例皮下注射),16例接受了TNFi治疗(12例标准剂量阿达木单抗,2例高剂量阿达木单抗,2例英夫利昔单抗):MTX和TNFi葡萄膜炎CTP均可在临床环境中实际应用,目前正在各注册中心使用。然而,在开始接受 TNFi 治疗的患者中,所有试点研究参与者和 CARRA 注册中心的大多数患者都接受了标准剂量的阿达木单抗治疗。这种治疗方法上的共识强调了它的广泛接受性,但也限制了葡萄膜炎TNFi CTP在比较有效性研究中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Rheumatology
Pediatric Rheumatology PEDIATRICS-RHEUMATOLOGY
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Rheumatology is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal encompassing all aspects of clinical and basic research related to pediatric rheumatology and allied subjects. The journal’s scope of diseases and syndromes include musculoskeletal pain syndromes, rheumatic fever and post-streptococcal syndromes, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile dermatomyositis, local and systemic scleroderma, Kawasaki disease, Henoch-Schonlein purpura and other vasculitides, sarcoidosis, inherited musculoskeletal syndromes, autoinflammatory syndromes, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信