Investigation of comparative nonword repetition performance in multiple sclerosis: Group differences, subtype variations, and disability effects.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Melis Buse Arslan, Özlem Öge-Daşdöğen
{"title":"Investigation of comparative nonword repetition performance in multiple sclerosis: Group differences, subtype variations, and disability effects.","authors":"Melis Buse Arslan, Özlem Öge-Daşdöğen","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2408393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated Nonword Repetition (NWR) tasks in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) compared to healthy controls (HC), focusing on phonological working memory (WM<sub>P</sub>). Significant differences were found in NWR acurracy (NWR<sub>acc)</sub> score between MS subgroups and HC (H = 48.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001). NWR<sub>acc</sub> decreased as the number of syllables increased in both groups, indicating increased cognitive load. All MS subtypes showed lower NWR<sub>acc</sub> compared to HC across varying syllable lengths (Mann Whitney U Test: two syllables U = 64.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001; three syllables U = 183, <i>p</i> < 0.001; four syllables U = 248, <i>p</i> < 0.001; five syllables U = 283.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found within MS subtypes based on syllable length. NWR<sub>acc</sub> did not differ between mild and severe MS groups. Overall, the NWR test effectively assessed WM<sub>P</sub> in MS, highlighting its utility in diagnosing and addressing language-cognitive challenges in individuals with MS. This underscores the importance of tailored intervention strategies to mitigate these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2408393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated Nonword Repetition (NWR) tasks in individuals with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) compared to healthy controls (HC), focusing on phonological working memory (WMP). Significant differences were found in NWR acurracy (NWRacc) score between MS subgroups and HC (H = 48.2, p < 0.001). NWRacc decreased as the number of syllables increased in both groups, indicating increased cognitive load. All MS subtypes showed lower NWRacc compared to HC across varying syllable lengths (Mann Whitney U Test: two syllables U = 64.5, p < 0.001; three syllables U = 183, p < 0.001; four syllables U = 248, p < 0.001; five syllables U = 283.5, p < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found within MS subtypes based on syllable length. NWRacc did not differ between mild and severe MS groups. Overall, the NWR test effectively assessed WMP in MS, highlighting its utility in diagnosing and addressing language-cognitive challenges in individuals with MS. This underscores the importance of tailored intervention strategies to mitigate these challenges.

多发性硬化症患者非词重复能力比较研究:群体差异、亚型变化和残疾影响。
本研究调查了多发性硬化症(MS)患者与健康对照组(HC)的非词重复(NWR)任务,重点是语音工作记忆(WMP)。研究发现,多发性硬化症亚组与健康对照组之间的非词重复熟练度(NWRacc)得分存在显著差异(H = 48.2,p acc 随着两组音节数的增加而降低,表明认知负荷增加。与 HC 相比,所有 MS 亚型在不同音节长度上的 NWRacc 分数都较低(Mann Whitney U 测试:两个音节 U = 64.5,p p p acc 在轻度和重度 MS 组之间没有差异。总之,NWR 测试有效地评估了多发性硬化症患者的 WMP,突出了其在诊断和解决多发性硬化症患者语言认知挑战方面的实用性。这凸显了量身定制干预策略以减轻这些挑战的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信