Family Medicine Resident Remediation Compared Across Two CERA Studies.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
David Rebedew, Theodore Bell, Abdul Waheed, Erum Azhar
{"title":"Family Medicine Resident Remediation Compared Across Two CERA Studies.","authors":"David Rebedew, Theodore Bell, Abdul Waheed, Erum Azhar","doi":"10.22454/FamMed.2024.375189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>From 2020 to 2022, multiple medical schools transitioned from teaching patient care directly to online electives. Family medicine program directors reported on these learners' abilities to meet the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies during residency. The authors hypothesized an increased need for medical knowledge remediation in the 2023 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2017 and 2023 CERA studies, the authors evaluated which factors were associated with residents requiring remediation, residents completing remediation, the duration of remediation, and the most remediated core competency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to 2017, the percentage of residents who successfully remediated in the 2023 study increased (P=.006), while remediation duration stayed unchanged at 6 to 12 months. The top ACGME core competency needing remediation remained professionalism in both studies (2017: 38.1%; 2023: 45.1%; P=.10) with medical knowledge being second most common (2017: 30.2%; 2023: 25.2%; P=.20). We found no associations between non-U.S. medical graduate percentage, core faculty remediation training, professionalism training, or didactic hours and the number of residents undergoing remediation, the percentage of residents remediating successfully, or the most common competency remediated. Program director gender, degree, race, years of experience, underrepresented in medicine status, and remediation training were not associated with any resident remediation variables studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Professionalism remains the top core competency requiring remediation. We found no associations between resident, program, training, or program director factors and the core competency requiring remediation, the number of residents needing remediation, or the percentage of residents who completed remediation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50456,"journal":{"name":"Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2024.375189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: From 2020 to 2022, multiple medical schools transitioned from teaching patient care directly to online electives. Family medicine program directors reported on these learners' abilities to meet the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) core competencies during residency. The authors hypothesized an increased need for medical knowledge remediation in the 2023 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) study.

Methods: Using the 2017 and 2023 CERA studies, the authors evaluated which factors were associated with residents requiring remediation, residents completing remediation, the duration of remediation, and the most remediated core competency.

Results: Compared to 2017, the percentage of residents who successfully remediated in the 2023 study increased (P=.006), while remediation duration stayed unchanged at 6 to 12 months. The top ACGME core competency needing remediation remained professionalism in both studies (2017: 38.1%; 2023: 45.1%; P=.10) with medical knowledge being second most common (2017: 30.2%; 2023: 25.2%; P=.20). We found no associations between non-U.S. medical graduate percentage, core faculty remediation training, professionalism training, or didactic hours and the number of residents undergoing remediation, the percentage of residents remediating successfully, or the most common competency remediated. Program director gender, degree, race, years of experience, underrepresented in medicine status, and remediation training were not associated with any resident remediation variables studied.

Conclusions: Professionalism remains the top core competency requiring remediation. We found no associations between resident, program, training, or program director factors and the core competency requiring remediation, the number of residents needing remediation, or the percentage of residents who completed remediation.

两项 CERA 研究中全科住院医师补救措施的比较。
背景和目标:从 2020 年到 2022 年,多所医学院从直接教授病人护理过渡到在线选修课。全科医学项目主任报告了这些学员在住院实习期间达到毕业医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)核心能力要求的能力。作者假设,在2023年全科医学教育研究联盟理事会(CERA)的研究中,对医学知识补习的需求会增加:作者利用2017年和2023年的CERA研究,评估了哪些因素与需要补习的住院医师、完成补习的住院医师、补习持续时间以及补习最多的核心能力相关:与2017年相比,2023年研究中成功补救的住院医师比例有所增加(P=.006),而补救持续时间保持不变,仍为6至12个月。在这两项研究中,需要补习的 ACGME 核心能力中排名第一的仍然是职业精神(2017 年:38.1%;2023 年:45.1%;P=.10),医学知识排名第二(2017 年:30.2%;2023 年:25.2%;P=.20)。我们发现,非美国医学毕业生比例、核心教师补救培训、职业素养培训或授课时数与接受补救的住院医师人数、成功补救的住院医师比例或最常见的补救能力之间没有关联。项目主任的性别、学位、种族、工作年限、在医学界代表性不足的状况以及补救培训与所研究的任何住院医师补救变量均无关联:结论:专业精神仍然是需要补救的首要核心能力。我们发现,住院医师、项目、培训或项目主任因素与需要补习的核心能力、需要补习的住院医师人数或完成补习的住院医师百分比之间均无关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Medicine
Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Medicine, the official journal of the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, publishes original research, systematic reviews, narrative essays, and policy analyses relevant to the discipline of family medicine, particularly focusing on primary care medical education, health workforce policy, and health services research. Journal content is not limited to educational research from family medicine educators; and we welcome innovative, high-quality contributions from authors in a variety of specialties and academic fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信