Neonatal analgesic prescription practices in central India: A cross-sectional survey.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Vrinda Agarwal, Jaya Upadhyay, Nency Sahu, Rashmi Parihar, Pawan Agarwal, Dhananjaya Sharma
{"title":"Neonatal analgesic prescription practices in central India: A cross-sectional survey.","authors":"Vrinda Agarwal, Jaya Upadhyay, Nency Sahu, Rashmi Parihar, Pawan Agarwal, Dhananjaya Sharma","doi":"10.1177/00494755241288292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This descriptive survey assessed knowledge, attitude and practice regarding analgesic prescription practices in neonates. A web-based questionnaire was developed and circulated to 150 physicians working in public and private neonatal intensive care units, of whom 87% were aware of neonatal pain perception; however, only 57.3% had any definite pain management policy. Some 66% were aware of a pain assessment tool in neonates, yet none had used it, though 80% used analgesics in their neonatal intensive care unit but only 44.3% were satisfied with the subsequent pain management. The most commonly used agents were midazolam and fentanyl. A total of 55% thought that opioid analgesia should not be used in neonates and morphine was used by only 5%; however, there seemed a general acceptance of opioid use since 86% used fentanyl as an analgesic. Non-pharmacological methods were used by 81%. Pain treatment in neonatal intensive care units is thus suboptimal and requires more attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":49415,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Doctor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Doctor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00494755241288292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This descriptive survey assessed knowledge, attitude and practice regarding analgesic prescription practices in neonates. A web-based questionnaire was developed and circulated to 150 physicians working in public and private neonatal intensive care units, of whom 87% were aware of neonatal pain perception; however, only 57.3% had any definite pain management policy. Some 66% were aware of a pain assessment tool in neonates, yet none had used it, though 80% used analgesics in their neonatal intensive care unit but only 44.3% were satisfied with the subsequent pain management. The most commonly used agents were midazolam and fentanyl. A total of 55% thought that opioid analgesia should not be used in neonates and morphine was used by only 5%; however, there seemed a general acceptance of opioid use since 86% used fentanyl as an analgesic. Non-pharmacological methods were used by 81%. Pain treatment in neonatal intensive care units is thus suboptimal and requires more attention.

印度中部的新生儿镇痛处方实践:一项横断面调查。
这项描述性调查评估了有关新生儿镇痛处方的知识、态度和实践。我们制作了一份网络问卷,并分发给 150 名在公立和私立新生儿重症监护室工作的医生,其中 87% 意识到新生儿疼痛的存在,但只有 57.3% 制定了明确的疼痛管理政策。虽然 80% 的医生在新生儿重症监护室使用镇痛剂,但只有 44.3% 的医生对随后的疼痛管理表示满意。最常用的药物是咪达唑仑和芬太尼。55%的人认为新生儿不应该使用阿片类镇痛药,只有5%的人使用吗啡;不过,由于86%的人使用芬太尼作为镇痛药,因此阿片类药物的使用似乎得到了普遍认可。使用非药物方法的比例为 81%。因此,新生儿重症监护室的疼痛治疗效果并不理想,需要更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Doctor
Tropical Doctor 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The only journal written by and for health workers in low and middle-income countries, Tropical Doctor provides medical expertise and practical advice on how to apply current medical knowledge to the special circumstances of LMIC countries. This journal provides an ideal forum for sharing experiences and establishing best practice, aiding communication between medical professionals in different environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信