Worth the Pain? Comparing Pain Scores in Primary Furlow Palatoplasty With and Without Buccal Flap Augmentation.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
James A Mentz, Jessica R Nye, Madysen Johnson, Kylie Swiekatowski, Chioma G Obinero, Austin Lignieres, Danielle L Sobol, Matthew R Greives
{"title":"Worth the Pain? Comparing Pain Scores in Primary Furlow Palatoplasty With and Without Buccal Flap Augmentation.","authors":"James A Mentz, Jessica R Nye, Madysen Johnson, Kylie Swiekatowski, Chioma G Obinero, Austin Lignieres, Danielle L Sobol, Matthew R Greives","doi":"10.1177/10556656241288534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pain following primary palatoplasty can adversely affect nutritional and quality of life following primary palatoplasty. The incorporation of buccal flaps during primary cleft palate (CP) repair provides additional tissue to reduce the risk of velopharyngeal insufficiency, though the additional donor site may alter pain levels in the postoperative period. This study sought to compare postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing primary CP repair with or without buccal flaps.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-institution, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>An academic children's hospital with an affiliated comprehensive cleft care team.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients age 18 months or less with cleft palate undergoing primary palatoplasty from 2016 to 2021 were included. Patients were stratified by the number of buccal flaps utilized during repair.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcome was 24-h postoperative pain score, measured using the FLACC pain scale. Secondary outcome was 24-h postoperative narcotic use, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 patients (53 without buccal flaps, 53 with 1 + buccal flaps) were included. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain scores between the groups (<i>p </i>> 0.9). Both groups had similar postoperative narcotic utilization (<i>p </i>= 0.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates no significant difference in postoperative pain levels or narcotic utilization between patients undergoing primary Furlow palatoplasty with or without buccal flaps. This information can help address parental concerns regarding pain in the context of a larger donor site for patients undergoing primary palatoplasty with buccal flaps. Larger, multi-institutional randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656241288534"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241288534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pain following primary palatoplasty can adversely affect nutritional and quality of life following primary palatoplasty. The incorporation of buccal flaps during primary cleft palate (CP) repair provides additional tissue to reduce the risk of velopharyngeal insufficiency, though the additional donor site may alter pain levels in the postoperative period. This study sought to compare postoperative pain levels in patients undergoing primary CP repair with or without buccal flaps.

Design: A single-institution, retrospective cohort study.

Setting: An academic children's hospital with an affiliated comprehensive cleft care team.

Patients: Patients age 18 months or less with cleft palate undergoing primary palatoplasty from 2016 to 2021 were included. Patients were stratified by the number of buccal flaps utilized during repair.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was 24-h postoperative pain score, measured using the FLACC pain scale. Secondary outcome was 24-h postoperative narcotic use, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

Results: A total of 106 patients (53 without buccal flaps, 53 with 1 + buccal flaps) were included. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain scores between the groups (p > 0.9). Both groups had similar postoperative narcotic utilization (p = 0.8).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates no significant difference in postoperative pain levels or narcotic utilization between patients undergoing primary Furlow palatoplasty with or without buccal flaps. This information can help address parental concerns regarding pain in the context of a larger donor site for patients undergoing primary palatoplasty with buccal flaps. Larger, multi-institutional randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

疼痛值得吗?比较有无颊瓣增厚的原发性 Furlow 腭成形术的疼痛评分
目的:初级腭成形术后的疼痛会对营养和生活质量产生不利影响。在腭裂(CP)原发性修复术中加入颊瓣可提供额外的组织以降低咽喉发育不全的风险,但额外的供体部位可能会改变术后的疼痛程度。本研究旨在比较使用或不使用颊侧皮瓣进行初级腭裂修复术的患者的术后疼痛程度:设计:一项单一机构的回顾性队列研究:一家拥有附属综合唇裂护理团队的学术儿童医院:纳入2016年至2021年接受初级腭裂成形术的18个月或以下腭裂患者。根据修复过程中使用的颊瓣数量对患者进行分层:主要结果是术后24小时疼痛评分,使用FLACC疼痛量表测量。次要结果为术后 24 小时麻醉剂使用量,以吗啡毫克当量(MME)计算:共纳入 106 例患者(53 例无颊骨瓣,53 例有 1 + 颊骨瓣)。两组患者的术后疼痛评分无明显差异(P > 0.9)。两组患者术后使用麻醉药的情况相似(P = 0.8):这项研究表明,接受原发性 Furlow 腭成形术(带或不带颊瓣)的患者在术后疼痛程度或麻醉药使用量方面没有明显差异。这些信息有助于解决家长对使用颊瓣进行初级腭成形术的患者在供体部位较大的情况下疼痛问题的担忧。要证实这些研究结果,还需要进行更大规模的多机构随机试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信