Examining the Safety of Dorsogluteal and Ventrogluteal Sites for Intramuscular Injection in Older Adults

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nurdan Yalcin Atar, Melis Deniz Altan, Erhan Kaymaz
{"title":"Examining the Safety of Dorsogluteal and Ventrogluteal Sites for Intramuscular Injection in Older Adults","authors":"Nurdan Yalcin Atar,&nbsp;Melis Deniz Altan,&nbsp;Erhan Kaymaz","doi":"10.1111/opn.12655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Muscle, subcutaneous tissue and total tissue thicknesses are important factors in successful intramuscular injection. Muscle mass decreases and subcutaneous tissue increases with age. This may negatively affect the safety and effectiveness of intramuscular injection in older adults by increasing the risk of bone contact and subcutaneous drug administration. Intramuscular injection sites should be evaluated in this respect, but no previous study has evaluated the most appropriate sites for safe and effective intramuscular injection in older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to examine the safety of dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal injection sites in older adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study included 171 older adults who presented to the radiology clinic of a hospital between November 2022 and February 2023. We collected the study data using a descriptive characteristics form and an ultrasonographic measurement form. To complete the descriptive characteristics form, we interviewed the participants and measured their waist circumference, hip circumference, weight and height. Muscle, subcutaneous tissue and total tissue thicknesses at the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites were determined by ultrasonography. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites, respectively, total tissue thicknesses were 59.43 ± 11.21 and 48.78 ± 9.68 mm, subcutaneous tissue thicknesses were 20.07 ± 6.64 and 22.97 ± 7.40 mm and muscle thicknesses were 40.13 ± 5.59 and 25.61 ± 4.30 mm. Tissue thicknesses at both sites differed according to sex, weight, hip circumference and waist circumference (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Although both sites were acceptable according to the tissue thickness thresholds for intramuscular injection given in the literature (subcutaneous tissue &lt; 25 mm, total tissue &gt; 35 mm), the ventrogluteal site was more advantageous in terms of greater muscle thickness and lower subcutaneous tissue thickness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The results of this study indicated that both the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites are safe for intramuscular injections in older adults in terms of tissue thickness. However, the ventrogluteal site may be safer for older adults because of the lower risk of bone contact and subcutaneous injection. Further studies are needed on this subject.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Practice</h3>\n \n <p>This study is important in terms of determining the safe and effective gluteal site for IM injection in older people aged 65 and over, preventing complications that may arise from site selection, and developing nursing policies that consider older people as a special group in the selection of IM injection sites.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/opn.12655","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.12655","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Muscle, subcutaneous tissue and total tissue thicknesses are important factors in successful intramuscular injection. Muscle mass decreases and subcutaneous tissue increases with age. This may negatively affect the safety and effectiveness of intramuscular injection in older adults by increasing the risk of bone contact and subcutaneous drug administration. Intramuscular injection sites should be evaluated in this respect, but no previous study has evaluated the most appropriate sites for safe and effective intramuscular injection in older adults.

Objectives

This study aimed to examine the safety of dorsogluteal and ventrogluteal injection sites in older adults.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 171 older adults who presented to the radiology clinic of a hospital between November 2022 and February 2023. We collected the study data using a descriptive characteristics form and an ultrasonographic measurement form. To complete the descriptive characteristics form, we interviewed the participants and measured their waist circumference, hip circumference, weight and height. Muscle, subcutaneous tissue and total tissue thicknesses at the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites were determined by ultrasonography. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline.

Results

At the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites, respectively, total tissue thicknesses were 59.43 ± 11.21 and 48.78 ± 9.68 mm, subcutaneous tissue thicknesses were 20.07 ± 6.64 and 22.97 ± 7.40 mm and muscle thicknesses were 40.13 ± 5.59 and 25.61 ± 4.30 mm. Tissue thicknesses at both sites differed according to sex, weight, hip circumference and waist circumference (p < 0.05). Although both sites were acceptable according to the tissue thickness thresholds for intramuscular injection given in the literature (subcutaneous tissue < 25 mm, total tissue > 35 mm), the ventrogluteal site was more advantageous in terms of greater muscle thickness and lower subcutaneous tissue thickness.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicated that both the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites are safe for intramuscular injections in older adults in terms of tissue thickness. However, the ventrogluteal site may be safer for older adults because of the lower risk of bone contact and subcutaneous injection. Further studies are needed on this subject.

Implications for Practice

This study is important in terms of determining the safe and effective gluteal site for IM injection in older people aged 65 and over, preventing complications that may arise from site selection, and developing nursing policies that consider older people as a special group in the selection of IM injection sites.

Abstract Image

研究老年人背臀部和腹股沟部位肌肉注射的安全性。
背景:肌肉、皮下组织和总组织厚度是成功进行肌肉注射的重要因素。随着年龄的增长,肌肉质量会下降,皮下组织会增加。这可能会增加骨骼接触和皮下注射药物的风险,从而对老年人肌肉注射的安全性和有效性产生负面影响。在这方面,应该对肌肉注射部位进行评估,但以前没有研究评估过最适合老年人安全有效肌肉注射的部位:本研究旨在探讨老年人黄体背侧和黄体腹侧注射部位的安全性:这项横断面研究纳入了 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月期间在某医院放射科门诊就诊的 171 名老年人。我们使用描述性特征表和超声波测量表收集研究数据。为了填写描述性特征表,我们对参与者进行了访谈,并测量了他们的腰围、臀围、体重和身高。通过超声波检查确定了腹臀部和背臀部的肌肉、皮下组织和总组织厚度。这项研究遵循了加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南:腹臀部和背臀部的组织总厚度分别为(59.43 ± 11.21)毫米和(48.78 ± 9.68)毫米,皮下组织厚度分别为(20.07 ± 6.64)毫米和(22.97 ± 7.40)毫米,肌肉厚度分别为(40.13 ± 5.59)毫米和(25.61 ± 4.30)毫米。两个部位的组织厚度因性别、体重、臀围和腰围而异(p 35 毫米),腹臀部部位的肌肉厚度更大,皮下组织厚度更小(p 35 毫米):本研究结果表明,就组织厚度而言,黄体腹侧和黄体背侧都是老年人肌肉注射的安全部位。不过,对老年人来说,黄体腹侧部位可能更安全,因为接触骨骼和皮下注射的风险较低。对实践的意义:这项研究对于确定 65 岁及以上老年人臀部注射 IM 的安全有效部位、预防因选择部位而可能引起的并发症以及制定护理政策,将老年人作为选择 IM 注射部位的特殊群体具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信