Which Aspects of Parenting Predict the Development of Empathic Concern During Infancy?

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Tal Orlitsky, Maayan Davidov, Yael Paz, Ronit Roth-Hanania, Maia Ram Berger, Lital Yizhar, Liad Shiller, Carolyn Zahn-Waxler
{"title":"Which Aspects of Parenting Predict the Development of Empathic Concern During Infancy?","authors":"Tal Orlitsky,&nbsp;Maayan Davidov,&nbsp;Yael Paz,&nbsp;Ronit Roth-Hanania,&nbsp;Maia Ram Berger,&nbsp;Lital Yizhar,&nbsp;Liad Shiller,&nbsp;Carolyn Zahn-Waxler","doi":"10.1111/desc.13566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examined which parenting behaviors predict the development of infants’ empathic concern for others in distress. We distinguished between three forms of sensitive/responsive parenting: mothers' responsiveness to infant distress, their responsiveness to the infant's nondistress cues, and maternal expression of positive affect and affection in nondistress. Although in prior work these parenting behaviors were frequently combined, or subsumed under a single global construct, such as “sensitive responsiveness”, the three forms of parenting are theoretically distinct. We hypothesized that once all three were examined simultaneously, only responsiveness to distress would emerge as a unique predictor of empathy. A sample of 165 Israeli infants (50% girls) was assessed from 3 to 18 months. Parenting measures were coded from mother–infant interactions at 3 and 6 months, and infants’ empathic concern was assessed using three distressed stimuli at ages 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Path analysis models revealed that, consistent with the hypothesis, only responsiveness to distress uniquely predicted infants' subsequent empathic concern, over and above the other forms of parenting and preexisting empathy levels; conversely, being responsive or affectionate when infants were not distressed did not predict their empathic abilities. The findings underscore the importance of differentiating between theoretically distinct forms of parenting, even when they are correlated. The discussion addresses the role of responsiveness to infants’ distress in the early development of empathic capacity, and highlights avenues for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.13566","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13566","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined which parenting behaviors predict the development of infants’ empathic concern for others in distress. We distinguished between three forms of sensitive/responsive parenting: mothers' responsiveness to infant distress, their responsiveness to the infant's nondistress cues, and maternal expression of positive affect and affection in nondistress. Although in prior work these parenting behaviors were frequently combined, or subsumed under a single global construct, such as “sensitive responsiveness”, the three forms of parenting are theoretically distinct. We hypothesized that once all three were examined simultaneously, only responsiveness to distress would emerge as a unique predictor of empathy. A sample of 165 Israeli infants (50% girls) was assessed from 3 to 18 months. Parenting measures were coded from mother–infant interactions at 3 and 6 months, and infants’ empathic concern was assessed using three distressed stimuli at ages 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Path analysis models revealed that, consistent with the hypothesis, only responsiveness to distress uniquely predicted infants' subsequent empathic concern, over and above the other forms of parenting and preexisting empathy levels; conversely, being responsive or affectionate when infants were not distressed did not predict their empathic abilities. The findings underscore the importance of differentiating between theoretically distinct forms of parenting, even when they are correlated. The discussion addresses the role of responsiveness to infants’ distress in the early development of empathic capacity, and highlights avenues for future research.

Abstract Image

父母的哪些方面会影响婴儿期移情关注的发展?
本研究探讨了哪些养育行为可预测婴儿对他人困境的同理心发展。我们区分了三种形式的敏感/反应型养育行为:母亲对婴儿困境的反应、母亲对婴儿非困境线索的反应以及母亲在非困境中表达的积极情感和爱意。虽然在以前的研究中,这些养育行为经常被合并在一起,或归入一个单一的总体结构中,如 "敏感反应",但这三种养育形式在理论上是不同的。我们假设,一旦同时对这三种形式进行研究,只有对痛苦的反应性才是预测移情的唯一指标。我们对 165 名 3 至 18 个月大的以色列婴儿(50% 为女孩)进行了抽样评估。根据婴儿 3 个月和 6 个月时的母婴互动情况对育儿措施进行了编码,并在婴儿 3 个月、6 个月、12 个月和 18 个月时使用三种痛苦刺激对婴儿的移情关注进行了评估。路径分析模型显示,与假设一致的是,只有对苦恼的反应才能独特地预测婴儿随后的移情关注,而不是其他形式的养育方式和预先存在的移情水平;相反,当婴儿没有苦恼时的反应或亲昵并不能预测他们的移情能力。这些发现强调了区分理论上不同的养育形式的重要性,即使它们之间存在关联。本文讨论了对婴儿痛苦的反应在移情能力早期发展中的作用,并强调了未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信