A qualitative study of specialist multidisciplinary clinician perspectives on barriers/facilitators to care for children with brain cancer and their families: "We're a little bit different to our adult counterparts".

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tim Luckett, Michelle DiGiacomo, Nicole Heneka, Domenica Disalvo, Maja Garcia, Isabelle Schaeffer, Robyn Attwood, Jane Phillips
{"title":"A qualitative study of specialist multidisciplinary clinician perspectives on barriers/facilitators to care for children with brain cancer and their families: \"<i>We're a little bit different to our adult counterparts</i>\".","authors":"Tim Luckett, Michelle DiGiacomo, Nicole Heneka, Domenica Disalvo, Maja Garcia, Isabelle Schaeffer, Robyn Attwood, Jane Phillips","doi":"10.1017/S1478951524001421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Children with brain cancer and their families have complex care needs throughout diagnosis, active treatment, long-term survivorship, and the palliative phase of illness. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of Australian specialist clinicians on barriers and facilitators to health care for children with brain cancer and their families.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative approach was taken using semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants were clinicians of any discipline providing care to children with brain cancer and their families in Australia. Interviews were conducted by telephone and asked about perceived strengths and weaknesses in health care and available resources for this population. Qualitative content analysis used a directed approach with inductive refinement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven clinicians participated, 5 of whom were medical, 3 nursing, and 3 allied health. The overarching theme was that the rarity and diversity of brain tumors in children confers challenges to care that lead to variation in practice. Participants reported having to adapt care from guidelines and patient/family resources designed for adults with brain cancer and children with other cancers, and rely on clinical and research networks. Specialist comprehensive cancer care was generally perceived to offer the best model for accommodating the unique needs of each child/family, but barriers to access were highlighted for children in remote Australia, and long-term follow-up was perceived to be inadequate regardless of where children lived.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>Until further brain cancer-specific paediatric guidelines become available, our findings highlight the need for communities of practice to share resources and reduce unwarranted variation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research should focus on developing and evaluating guidelines and other resources specific to children with brain cancer, as well as informing suitable models for long-term follow-up care for survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951524001421","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Children with brain cancer and their families have complex care needs throughout diagnosis, active treatment, long-term survivorship, and the palliative phase of illness. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of Australian specialist clinicians on barriers and facilitators to health care for children with brain cancer and their families.

Methods: A qualitative approach was taken using semi-structured interviews. Eligible participants were clinicians of any discipline providing care to children with brain cancer and their families in Australia. Interviews were conducted by telephone and asked about perceived strengths and weaknesses in health care and available resources for this population. Qualitative content analysis used a directed approach with inductive refinement.

Results: Eleven clinicians participated, 5 of whom were medical, 3 nursing, and 3 allied health. The overarching theme was that the rarity and diversity of brain tumors in children confers challenges to care that lead to variation in practice. Participants reported having to adapt care from guidelines and patient/family resources designed for adults with brain cancer and children with other cancers, and rely on clinical and research networks. Specialist comprehensive cancer care was generally perceived to offer the best model for accommodating the unique needs of each child/family, but barriers to access were highlighted for children in remote Australia, and long-term follow-up was perceived to be inadequate regardless of where children lived.

Significance of results: Until further brain cancer-specific paediatric guidelines become available, our findings highlight the need for communities of practice to share resources and reduce unwarranted variation.

Conclusion: Future research should focus on developing and evaluating guidelines and other resources specific to children with brain cancer, as well as informing suitable models for long-term follow-up care for survivors.

一项关于多学科临床专科医生对护理脑癌儿童及其家人的障碍/促进因素的定性研究:"我们与成人患者有些不同"。
目标:患有脑癌的儿童及其家人在诊断、积极治疗、长期存活以及疾病缓解阶段都需要复杂的护理。本研究旨在从澳大利亚专科临床医生的角度,探讨脑癌儿童及其家人获得医疗保健的障碍和促进因素:方法:采用半结构化访谈的定性方法。符合条件的参与者是为澳大利亚脑癌儿童及其家人提供医疗服务的任何学科的临床医生。访谈是通过电话进行的,内容涉及该人群在医疗保健和可用资源方面的优势和劣势。定性内容分析采用定向方法,并进行归纳提炼:结果:11 名临床医生参与了访谈,其中 5 名是医疗人员,3 名是护理人员,3 名是联合医疗人员。总的主题是儿童脑肿瘤的罕见性和多样性给护理工作带来了挑战,导致实践中的差异。参与者报告说,他们必须根据为成年脑癌患者和其他癌症儿童患者设计的指南和患者/家庭资源调整护理方法,并依靠临床和研究网络。人们普遍认为,专科综合癌症护理为满足每个儿童/家庭的独特需求提供了最佳模式,但偏远地区的澳大利亚儿童在获得护理方面遇到的障碍也很突出,而且无论儿童住在哪里,长期随访都被认为是不够的:结果的意义:在制定出更多针对脑癌的儿科指南之前,我们的研究结果凸显了实践社区共享资源和减少不必要差异的必要性:未来的研究应侧重于开发和评估针对脑癌儿童的指南和其他资源,并为幸存者的长期后续护理提供合适的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信