Image quality assessments in abdominal CT: Relative importance of dose, iterative reconstruction strength and slice thickness

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
B. Kataria , M. Woisetschläger , J. Nilsson Althén , M. Sandborg , Ö. Smedby
{"title":"Image quality assessments in abdominal CT: Relative importance of dose, iterative reconstruction strength and slice thickness","authors":"B. Kataria ,&nbsp;M. Woisetschläger ,&nbsp;J. Nilsson Althén ,&nbsp;M. Sandborg ,&nbsp;Ö. Smedby","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.09.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Low contrast resolution in abdominal computed tomography (CT) may be negatively affected by attempts to lower patient doses. Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms play a key role in mitigating this problem. The reconstructed slice thickness also influences image quality. The aim was to assess the interaction and influence of patient dose, slice thickness, and IR strength on image quality in abdominal CT.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>With a simultaneous acquisition, images at 42 and 98 mAs were obtained in 25 patients. Multiplanar images with slice thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm and advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) strengths of 3 (AD3) and 5 (AD5) were reconstructed. Four radiologists evaluated the images in a pairwise manner based on five image criteria. Ordinal logistic regression with mixed effects was used to evaluate the effect of tube load, ADMIRE strength, and slice thickness using the visual grading regression technique.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For all assessed image criteria, the regression analysis showed significantly (<em>p &lt;</em> 0.001) higher image quality for AD5, but lower for tube load 42 mAs, and slice thicknesses of 1 mm and 2 mm, compared to the reference categories of AD3, 98 mAs, and 3 mm, respectively. AD5 at 2 mm was superior to AD3 at 3 mm for all image criteria studied. AD5 1 mm produced inferior image quality for liver parenchyma and overall image quality compared to AD3 3 mm. Interobserver agreement (ICC) ranged from 0.874 to 0.920.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ADMIRE 5 at 2 mm slice thickness may allow for further dose reductions due to its superiority when compared to ADMIRE 3 at 3 mm slice thickness.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>Combination of thinner slices and higher ADMIRE strength facilitates imaging at low dose.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 1563-1571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881742400289X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Low contrast resolution in abdominal computed tomography (CT) may be negatively affected by attempts to lower patient doses. Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms play a key role in mitigating this problem. The reconstructed slice thickness also influences image quality. The aim was to assess the interaction and influence of patient dose, slice thickness, and IR strength on image quality in abdominal CT.

Method

With a simultaneous acquisition, images at 42 and 98 mAs were obtained in 25 patients. Multiplanar images with slice thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm and advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) strengths of 3 (AD3) and 5 (AD5) were reconstructed. Four radiologists evaluated the images in a pairwise manner based on five image criteria. Ordinal logistic regression with mixed effects was used to evaluate the effect of tube load, ADMIRE strength, and slice thickness using the visual grading regression technique.

Results

For all assessed image criteria, the regression analysis showed significantly (p < 0.001) higher image quality for AD5, but lower for tube load 42 mAs, and slice thicknesses of 1 mm and 2 mm, compared to the reference categories of AD3, 98 mAs, and 3 mm, respectively. AD5 at 2 mm was superior to AD3 at 3 mm for all image criteria studied. AD5 1 mm produced inferior image quality for liver parenchyma and overall image quality compared to AD3 3 mm. Interobserver agreement (ICC) ranged from 0.874 to 0.920.

Conclusion

ADMIRE 5 at 2 mm slice thickness may allow for further dose reductions due to its superiority when compared to ADMIRE 3 at 3 mm slice thickness.

Implications for practice

Combination of thinner slices and higher ADMIRE strength facilitates imaging at low dose.
腹部 CT 图像质量评估:剂量、迭代重建强度和切片厚度的相对重要性。
简介:腹部计算机断层扫描(CT)的低对比分辨率可能会受到降低患者剂量的负面影响。迭代重建(IR)算法在缓解这一问题方面起着关键作用。重建切片厚度也会影响图像质量。目的是评估患者剂量、切片厚度和 IR 强度对腹部 CT 图像质量的相互作用和影响:方法:通过同步采集,在 42 和 98 mAs 下为 25 名患者获取图像。重建的多平面图像切片厚度为 1、2 和 3 毫米,高级建模迭代重建(ADMIRE)强度为 3(AD3)和 5(AD5)。四位放射科医生根据五项图像标准对图像进行了配对评估。利用视觉分级回归技术,使用混合效应的正序逻辑回归来评估导管负荷、ADMIRE强度和切片厚度的影响:结果:对于所有评估的图像标准,回归分析均显示出显著的影响(p 结论:ADMIRE 5 在 2 毫米的切片厚度上有显著的影响:与切片厚度为 3 毫米的 ADMIRE 3 相比,切片厚度为 2 毫米的 ADMIRE 5 具有优势,可进一步减少剂量:对实践的启示:薄切片与较高 ADMIRE 强度的结合有助于低剂量成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信