High-risk pediatric medications: A listing proposal by interdisciplinary consensus technique.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yolanda Hernández Gago, Pedro J Alcalá Minagorre, Belén Rodríguez Marrodán, Laura Hernández Sabater, María José Cabañas Poy, Cristina Martínez Roca, Jimena Pérez Moreno
{"title":"High-risk pediatric medications: A listing proposal by interdisciplinary consensus technique.","authors":"Yolanda Hernández Gago, Pedro J Alcalá Minagorre, Belén Rodríguez Marrodán, Laura Hernández Sabater, María José Cabañas Poy, Cristina Martínez Roca, Jimena Pérez Moreno","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric patients are more likely to experience medication-related errors and serious associated harms. The identification of high-risk medications (HRM) and their study in special populations, such as children with excess body weight, is a part of safety improvement strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To generate, through a consensus technique structured by an interdisciplinary group of pediatricians and hospital pharmacists, an operational and updated list of HRM for hospital use in children over 2 years of age. The document was part of a collaboration project between the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacists and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Hospital Medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was carried out in two sequential phases: a) preparation of a preliminary list of HRM through bibliographic review and b) subsequent application of the double-round Delphi method to agree on a definitive list of HRM. The results obtained were validated by calculating the probability of chance agreement and the modified Kappa statistic for each drug.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original list obtained by bibliographic review included 26 pharmacological classes and 96 drugs. Of the total of 37 experts, 32 (86.4%) completed both rounds of the Delphi. The final consensus list of HRM incorporated 24 pharmacological classes and 100 drugs. The modified Kappa statistic reflected a high percent agreement (94.9%) in the consensus reached by the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This list can establish a tool for future studies and interventions to improve the safety of medications in general pediatric population, as well as in high-risk subgroups, such as pediatric patients with excess body weight.</p>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farma.2024.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric patients are more likely to experience medication-related errors and serious associated harms. The identification of high-risk medications (HRM) and their study in special populations, such as children with excess body weight, is a part of safety improvement strategies.

Objective: To generate, through a consensus technique structured by an interdisciplinary group of pediatricians and hospital pharmacists, an operational and updated list of HRM for hospital use in children over 2 years of age. The document was part of a collaboration project between the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacists and the Spanish Society of Pediatric Hospital Medicine.

Methods: The study was carried out in two sequential phases: a) preparation of a preliminary list of HRM through bibliographic review and b) subsequent application of the double-round Delphi method to agree on a definitive list of HRM. The results obtained were validated by calculating the probability of chance agreement and the modified Kappa statistic for each drug.

Results: The original list obtained by bibliographic review included 26 pharmacological classes and 96 drugs. Of the total of 37 experts, 32 (86.4%) completed both rounds of the Delphi. The final consensus list of HRM incorporated 24 pharmacological classes and 100 drugs. The modified Kappa statistic reflected a high percent agreement (94.9%) in the consensus reached by the participants.

Conclusion: This list can establish a tool for future studies and interventions to improve the safety of medications in general pediatric population, as well as in high-risk subgroups, such as pediatric patients with excess body weight.

高风险儿科药物:通过跨学科共识技术提出的列表建议。
导言:儿科患者更容易出现用药错误和严重的相关伤害。识别高风险药物(HRM)并对其在特殊人群(如体重超标儿童)中的应用进行研究,是安全改进战略的一部分:目的:由儿科医生和医院药剂师组成的跨学科小组通过共识技术,制定出一份可操作的最新高危药品清单,供医院用于 2 岁以上儿童。该文件是西班牙医院药剂师协会和西班牙儿科医院医学协会合作项目的一部分:研究分两个阶段依次进行:a) 通过书目审查编制一份初步的 HRM 清单;b) 随后采用双轮德尔菲法商定一份确定的 HRM 清单。通过计算每种药物的偶然一致概率和修正的 Kappa 统计量,对所获得的结果进行了验证:结果:通过文献综述获得的原始清单包括 26 个药理类别和 96 种药物。在总共 37 位专家中,32 位(86.4%)完成了两轮德尔菲法。人力资源管理局的最终共识清单包括 24 个药理类别和 100 种药物。修改后的卡帕统计反映出参与者达成的共识具有很高的一致性(94.9%):该清单可为今后的研究和干预提供工具,以改善普通儿科人群以及高风险亚群(如体重超标的儿科患者)的用药安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信