Evaluation of the agreement of horizontal and vertical linear measurements obtained from digital models, printed models and direct measurements.

Q2 Medicine

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e242460.oar

Sergio Luiz Mota-Júnior, Ana Clara Titoneli Abreu, Brenda Vitória Monteiro Dos Santos, Ana Laura Lassance Marangon, Marcio José da Silva Campos, Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral

{"title":"Evaluation of the agreement of horizontal and vertical linear measurements obtained from digital models, printed models and direct measurements.","authors":"Sergio Luiz Mota-Júnior, Ana Clara Titoneli Abreu, Brenda Vitória Monteiro Dos Santos, Ana Laura Lassance Marangon, Marcio José da Silva Campos, Robert Willer Farinazzo Vitral","doi":"10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e242460.oar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The use of arch models is essential in diagnosis and planning in orthodontics. The demand for digital and printed models has increased among professionals.Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the agreement of horizontal and vertical linear measurements obtained from digital models, printed models, and direct measurements.Materials and methods: Intraoral scans of 30 individuals were obtained. Digital measurements were performed using the STL files. From printed models, the measurements were done using a digital caliper, and the real measurements were done directly to the mouth of respective patients.Results: The one-sample t test showed no discrepancy between the paired sets of measurements, with the value of 0 (p>0.05). The evaluation of the measurements was done using Bland-Altman analysis in pairs. The three methods showed agreement in horizontal and vertical measurements. Linear regression analyses showed no proportional bias in the data (p>0.05).Conclusion: The horizontal and vertical measurements evaluated showed agreement when measured on digital models, printed models and directly in the individuals' mouths.","PeriodicalId":38720,"journal":{"name":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"29 5","pages":"e242460"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.29.5.e242460.oar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of arch models is essential in diagnosis and planning in orthodontics. The demand for digital and printed models has increased among professionals.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the agreement of horizontal and vertical linear measurements obtained from digital models, printed models, and direct measurements.

Materials and methods: Intraoral scans of 30 individuals were obtained. Digital measurements were performed using the STL files. From printed models, the measurements were done using a digital caliper, and the real measurements were done directly to the mouth of respective patients.

Results: The one-sample t test showed no discrepancy between the paired sets of measurements, with the value of 0 (p>0.05). The evaluation of the measurements was done using Bland-Altman analysis in pairs. The three methods showed agreement in horizontal and vertical measurements. Linear regression analyses showed no proportional bias in the data (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The horizontal and vertical measurements evaluated showed agreement when measured on digital models, printed models and directly in the individuals' mouths.

查看原文本刊更多论文

评估通过数字模型、印刷模型和直接测量获得的水平和垂直线性测量结果的一致性。

介绍：在口腔正畸的诊断和规划中，牙弓模型的使用至关重要。专业人士对数字模型和打印模型的需求不断增加：研究旨在评估从数字模型、打印模型和直接测量中获得的水平和垂直线性测量值的一致性：材料：采集了 30 个人的口内扫描图像。使用 STL 文件进行数字化测量。使用数字卡尺对打印模型进行测量，并直接对患者口腔进行实际测量：单样本 t 检验显示，两组配对测量结果之间没有差异，数值为 0（p>0.05）。采用布兰-阿尔特曼（Bland-Altman）分析法对成对测量结果进行评估。三种方法的水平和垂直测量结果显示一致。线性回归分析显示数据没有比例偏差（p>0.05）：在数字模型、打印模型和直接在个人口腔中进行测量时，水平和垂直测量结果显示一致。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

27 weeks

期刊介绍： The Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics publishes scientific research articles, significant reviews, clinical and technical case reports, brief communications, and other materials related to Orthodontics and Facial Orthopedics.