The Mediation Roles of Coping Modalities on the Relationship Between Stress and Quality of Life Among Jordanian Nurses.

Q2 Environmental Science
The Scientific World Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/4434406
Wafa'a Ta'an, Yasin Yasin, Mohammed M Al-Hammouri, Majd Aljabali, Diana Jaradat, Mohammad Suliman, Mohammed Albashtawy, Islam Oweidat, Yazid Al-Hamarneh
{"title":"The Mediation Roles of Coping Modalities on the Relationship Between Stress and Quality of Life Among Jordanian Nurses.","authors":"Wafa'a Ta'an, Yasin Yasin, Mohammed M Al-Hammouri, Majd Aljabali, Diana Jaradat, Mohammad Suliman, Mohammed Albashtawy, Islam Oweidat, Yazid Al-Hamarneh","doi":"10.1155/2024/4434406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nurses are at the frontline, dealing with people's most immense healthcare needs in stressful and demanding work environments. Consequently, it is essential to thoroughly examine how various coping mechanisms might affect the relationship between stress and quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to examine the mediation effect of both problem-focused coping (PFC) and emotion-focused coping (EFC) mechanisms on mitigating the effect of stress on the QOL among Jordanian nurses. A multisite cross-sectional descriptive correlational design was used in this study. An online survey was completed by 203 nurses using a convenience sampling technique between October 2023 and January 2024. The study included nurses working in different Jordanian healthcare sectors including governmental, private, and university-affiliated hospitals. Several measures were used to collect data, including questionnaires on sociodemographics, QOL, coping, and stress. Two models were hypothesized for this study. The two models were analyzed using Andrew Hayes Process Macro Model 4 for testing the mediation effects. Additionally, descriptive and correlational analyses were run prior to the main analysis. The results showed that coping significantly mediated the relationship between stress and QOL with variations between PFC and EFC. In conclusion, psychological distress symptoms were common among Jordanian nurses; psychological distress, coping, and QOL are correlating variables. Nurses' stress levels and coping modalities can predict QOL with a superior effect of PFC compared with EFC. Strategies should be put in place to improve effective coping to improve nurses' QOL. The results of this study have important implications for nursing education, practice, future research, and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22985,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific World Journal","volume":"2024 ","pages":"4434406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/4434406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nurses are at the frontline, dealing with people's most immense healthcare needs in stressful and demanding work environments. Consequently, it is essential to thoroughly examine how various coping mechanisms might affect the relationship between stress and quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to examine the mediation effect of both problem-focused coping (PFC) and emotion-focused coping (EFC) mechanisms on mitigating the effect of stress on the QOL among Jordanian nurses. A multisite cross-sectional descriptive correlational design was used in this study. An online survey was completed by 203 nurses using a convenience sampling technique between October 2023 and January 2024. The study included nurses working in different Jordanian healthcare sectors including governmental, private, and university-affiliated hospitals. Several measures were used to collect data, including questionnaires on sociodemographics, QOL, coping, and stress. Two models were hypothesized for this study. The two models were analyzed using Andrew Hayes Process Macro Model 4 for testing the mediation effects. Additionally, descriptive and correlational analyses were run prior to the main analysis. The results showed that coping significantly mediated the relationship between stress and QOL with variations between PFC and EFC. In conclusion, psychological distress symptoms were common among Jordanian nurses; psychological distress, coping, and QOL are correlating variables. Nurses' stress levels and coping modalities can predict QOL with a superior effect of PFC compared with EFC. Strategies should be put in place to improve effective coping to improve nurses' QOL. The results of this study have important implications for nursing education, practice, future research, and policy.

应对方式对约旦护士压力与生活质量之间关系的调解作用。
护士身处第一线,在压力巨大、要求苛刻的工作环境中处理人们最迫切的医疗保健需求。因此,深入研究各种应对机制如何影响压力与生活质量(QOL)之间的关系至关重要。本研究旨在探讨问题应对(PFC)和情绪应对(EFC)机制对减轻压力对约旦护士生活质量的影响的中介作用。本研究采用了多地点横截面描述性相关设计。2023 年 10 月至 2024 年 1 月期间,采用方便抽样技术对 203 名护士进行了在线调查。研究对象包括在约旦不同医疗部门工作的护士,包括政府医院、私立医院和大学附属医院。研究采用了多种方法收集数据,包括社会人口学、QOL、应对和压力问卷。本研究假设了两个模型。使用安德鲁-海斯过程宏模型 4 对这两个模型进行了分析,以检验中介效应。此外,在主要分析之前还进行了描述性分析和相关分析。结果表明,应对在很大程度上调节了压力和 QOL 之间的关系,但 PFC 和 EFC 之间存在差异。总之,约旦护士普遍存在心理困扰症状;心理困扰、应对方式和 QOL 是相关变量。护士的压力水平和应对方式可以预测 QOL,其中 PFC 的效果优于 EFC。应制定策略,提高有效的应对方式,以改善护士的 QOL。本研究结果对护理教育、实践、未来研究和政策具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Scientific World Journal
The Scientific World Journal 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The Scientific World Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, reviews, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in science, technology, and medicine. The journal is divided into 81 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信