Sow reproductive and progeny growth performance when fed Pichia guilliermondii yeast postbiotic: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-09-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txae137
Clementine Oguey, Morgan T Thayer
{"title":"Sow reproductive and progeny growth performance when fed <i>Pichia guilliermondii</i> yeast postbiotic: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Clementine Oguey, Morgan T Thayer","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research suggested that feeding sows with a product containing an inactivated strain specific <i>Pichia guilliermondii</i> yeast postbiotic (<b>PG</b>; Citristim, ADM Animal Nutrition, Quincy, IL) has the potential to support fecundity, and progeny performance at birth, weaning, and after weaning. To summarize these effects, a systematic review followed by a meta-analysis was carried out to determine the effects of feeding sows with PG during gestation and lactation on reproductive the performance of sows and the growth of progeny after weaning. All experiments included were randomized trials reporting side-by-side comparisons of an appropriate control (<b>CON</b>) and the CON with the inclusion of PG. The effects of PG inclusion in sow diets were evaluated using the raw mean difference and effect size calculations. Analysis included seven trials for sow reproductive and litter performance until weaning, and eight trials for progeny performance after weaning. The risk of publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. In the case of publication bias, the Trim and Fill method was used. Heterogeneity was assessed using <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistics. Sows fed PG during gestation and lactation had more piglets born alive (BA), BA + stillborn, and BA + stillborn + mummies (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The individual birth weight of the piglets was not affected by the supplementation (<i>P</i> = 0.835). As a result, litter weight at birth was greater in sows-fed PG (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Piglets born from PG-fed sows tended to be weaned 0.34 d younger than those from CON-fed sows (<i>P</i> = 0.060). Twenty-one-day adjusted pig weight at weaning tended to be lighter by 0.122 kg in the PG sow group (<i>P</i> = 0.069); however, litter weight at weaning adjusted to 21 d remained similar across groups (<i>P</i> = 0.516). The number of piglets weaned and mortality-adjusted number of piglets weaned per sow were greater in PG than in CON sows (<i>P</i> < 0.023). A carryover effect was observed for progeny of PG-fed sows after weaning. Piglets born from PG-supplemented sows had greater weight gain (<i>P</i> = 0.030) and tended to have a better survival rate (<i>P</i> = 0.055) until the end of the nursery phase. These results indicate that feeding PG to sows during gestation and lactation consistently and significantly improves not only the performance of sows at farrowing but also performance of the progeny after weaning.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research suggested that feeding sows with a product containing an inactivated strain specific Pichia guilliermondii yeast postbiotic (PG; Citristim, ADM Animal Nutrition, Quincy, IL) has the potential to support fecundity, and progeny performance at birth, weaning, and after weaning. To summarize these effects, a systematic review followed by a meta-analysis was carried out to determine the effects of feeding sows with PG during gestation and lactation on reproductive the performance of sows and the growth of progeny after weaning. All experiments included were randomized trials reporting side-by-side comparisons of an appropriate control (CON) and the CON with the inclusion of PG. The effects of PG inclusion in sow diets were evaluated using the raw mean difference and effect size calculations. Analysis included seven trials for sow reproductive and litter performance until weaning, and eight trials for progeny performance after weaning. The risk of publication bias was assessed by funnel plots. In the case of publication bias, the Trim and Fill method was used. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. Sows fed PG during gestation and lactation had more piglets born alive (BA), BA + stillborn, and BA + stillborn + mummies (P < 0.001). The individual birth weight of the piglets was not affected by the supplementation (P = 0.835). As a result, litter weight at birth was greater in sows-fed PG (P < 0.001). Piglets born from PG-fed sows tended to be weaned 0.34 d younger than those from CON-fed sows (P = 0.060). Twenty-one-day adjusted pig weight at weaning tended to be lighter by 0.122 kg in the PG sow group (P = 0.069); however, litter weight at weaning adjusted to 21 d remained similar across groups (P = 0.516). The number of piglets weaned and mortality-adjusted number of piglets weaned per sow were greater in PG than in CON sows (P < 0.023). A carryover effect was observed for progeny of PG-fed sows after weaning. Piglets born from PG-supplemented sows had greater weight gain (P = 0.030) and tended to have a better survival rate (P = 0.055) until the end of the nursery phase. These results indicate that feeding PG to sows during gestation and lactation consistently and significantly improves not only the performance of sows at farrowing but also performance of the progeny after weaning.

饲喂Pichia guilliermondii酵母后生菌的母猪繁殖和后代生长性能:系统综述和荟萃分析。
以前的研究表明,用含有灭活的特异性Pichia guilliermondii酵母后生菌株的产品(PG;Citristim,ADM动物营养公司,伊利诺斯州昆西市)饲喂母猪有可能提高受胎率以及后代在出生、断奶和断奶后的表现。为了总结这些作用,我们进行了一项系统性综述和荟萃分析,以确定在妊娠和哺乳期用 PG 饲喂母猪对母猪繁殖性能和断奶后后代生长的影响。纳入的所有实验都是随机试验,报告了适当对照组(CON)和添加 PG 的对照组的并列比较。母猪日粮中添加 PG 的效果通过原始平均差和效应大小计算进行评估。分析包括断奶前母猪繁殖和产仔性能的七项试验和断奶后后代性能的八项试验。漏斗图评估了发表偏倚的风险。如果存在发表偏倚,则采用修剪和填充法。异质性采用 I 2 统计法进行评估。在妊娠期和哺乳期饲喂 PG 的母猪,活产仔猪(BA)、BA + 死胎仔猪和 BA + 死胎仔猪 + 木乃伊仔猪的数量较多(P P = 0.835)。因此,饲喂 PG 的母猪出生窝重较大(P P = 0.060)。经 21 天调整后,PG 母猪组断奶时的仔猪体重往往轻 0.122 千克(P = 0.069);然而,经 21 天调整后,各组断奶时的仔猪体重仍然相似(P = 0.516)。PG 组母猪断奶仔猪数和死亡率调整后的每头母猪断奶仔猪数均高于 CON 组母猪(P = 0.030),而且在保育期结束前,PG 组母猪的存活率更高(P = 0.055)。这些结果表明,在妊娠期和哺乳期给母猪饲喂 PG 不仅能持续、显著地提高母猪的产仔性能,还能提高断奶后后代的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信