Feeding limestone buffer to limit-fed dairy steers fed a high inclusion rate of distiller grains.

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txae130
Lydia K Olagunju, David P Casper
{"title":"Feeding limestone buffer to limit-fed dairy steers fed a high inclusion rate of distiller grains.","authors":"Lydia K Olagunju, David P Casper","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study objective was to evaluate dietary limestone buffer inclusion rates for impacting nutrient digestibility and excretion when growing dairy cattle are fed high distiller grains with solubles (DDGS) limit-fed ration. The hypothesis was that feeding more limestone buffer would offset a low rumen pH when feeding a high DDGS inclusion rate. Five ruminally cannulated Holstein and Brown Swiss steers were used in a crossover design having 2-wk periods to evaluate high and low buffer inclusion rates when limit-fed. Treatments were similar in ingredient composition being: 1) 40% DDGS at 0.80% high CaCO<sub>3</sub> buffer inclusion (<b>HIGH</b>) and 2) 40% DDGS with 0.25% low CaCO<sub>3</sub> buffer inclusion (<b>LOW)</b> with the remaining ration consisting of grass hay with minerals and vitamins. Rations were limit-fed at 2.50% of body weight (<b>BW</b>) using Calan feeding doors with steers being weighed every 2 wk with ration amounts adjusted accordingly. Rumen fluid was collected via the ruminal cannula at the start and end of each period for pH, ammonia-n, and volatile fatty acid (VFA)s. Fecal grab samples were collected at the end of each period for measurement of total-tract nutrient digestibility. There were no treatment-by-period interactions (<i>P</i> > 0.10) for any of the growth parameters measured. Gains in frame growth parameters were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.10) for steers fed both rations. BWs and gains were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.10) for steers fed both rations. Steers fed the LOW ration demonstrated a numeric improvement in average daily gain combined with a tendency (<i>P</i> < 0.06) for lower dry matter intake resulting in an improved (<i>P</i> < 0.01) feed efficiency (gain:feed) compared with steers fed the HIGH ration. Steers fed HIGH demonstrated greater (<i>P</i> < 0.01) ruminal ammonia-N and isovalerate concentrations compared with steers fed the LOW buffer ration. Steers fed both buffer inclusion rates were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.10) for ruminal pH and remaining VFAs concentrations. Steers fed both buffer inclusion rates were similar (<i>P</i> > 0.10) in DM and organic matter digestibilities. Limit-feeding a high DDGS inclusion rate ratio combined with a low buffer inclusion rate improved feed efficiency while maintaining growth performance. The study hypothesis was rejected in that feed efficiency can be enhanced when feeding a high DDGS ration by feeding a low calcium carbonate buffer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study objective was to evaluate dietary limestone buffer inclusion rates for impacting nutrient digestibility and excretion when growing dairy cattle are fed high distiller grains with solubles (DDGS) limit-fed ration. The hypothesis was that feeding more limestone buffer would offset a low rumen pH when feeding a high DDGS inclusion rate. Five ruminally cannulated Holstein and Brown Swiss steers were used in a crossover design having 2-wk periods to evaluate high and low buffer inclusion rates when limit-fed. Treatments were similar in ingredient composition being: 1) 40% DDGS at 0.80% high CaCO3 buffer inclusion (HIGH) and 2) 40% DDGS with 0.25% low CaCO3 buffer inclusion (LOW) with the remaining ration consisting of grass hay with minerals and vitamins. Rations were limit-fed at 2.50% of body weight (BW) using Calan feeding doors with steers being weighed every 2 wk with ration amounts adjusted accordingly. Rumen fluid was collected via the ruminal cannula at the start and end of each period for pH, ammonia-n, and volatile fatty acid (VFA)s. Fecal grab samples were collected at the end of each period for measurement of total-tract nutrient digestibility. There were no treatment-by-period interactions (P > 0.10) for any of the growth parameters measured. Gains in frame growth parameters were similar (P > 0.10) for steers fed both rations. BWs and gains were similar (P > 0.10) for steers fed both rations. Steers fed the LOW ration demonstrated a numeric improvement in average daily gain combined with a tendency (P < 0.06) for lower dry matter intake resulting in an improved (P < 0.01) feed efficiency (gain:feed) compared with steers fed the HIGH ration. Steers fed HIGH demonstrated greater (P < 0.01) ruminal ammonia-N and isovalerate concentrations compared with steers fed the LOW buffer ration. Steers fed both buffer inclusion rates were similar (P > 0.10) for ruminal pH and remaining VFAs concentrations. Steers fed both buffer inclusion rates were similar (P > 0.10) in DM and organic matter digestibilities. Limit-feeding a high DDGS inclusion rate ratio combined with a low buffer inclusion rate improved feed efficiency while maintaining growth performance. The study hypothesis was rejected in that feed efficiency can be enhanced when feeding a high DDGS ration by feeding a low calcium carbonate buffer.

用石灰石缓冲剂饲喂饲喂率较高的蒸馏谷物的限饲奶牛。
该研究的目的是评估日粮中石灰石缓冲剂的添加量对生长奶牛饲喂含溶解物高蒸馏谷物(DDGS)限饲日粮时养分消化率和排泄量的影响。我们的假设是,在饲喂高DDGS添加量时,饲喂更多的石灰石缓冲剂将抵消瘤胃pH值的降低。在为期 2 周的交叉设计中,使用了 5 头反刍的荷斯坦和棕瑞牛,对限饲时的高缓冲剂添加率和低缓冲剂添加率进行了评估。各处理的成分相似:1)40% 的 DDGS,0.80% 的高 CaCO3 缓冲剂添加量(高);2)40% 的 DDGS,0.25% 的低 CaCO3 缓冲剂添加量(低),其余日粮由含有矿物质和维生素的干草组成。使用卡兰饲喂门按体重(BW)的 2.50%限量饲喂日粮,每两周称重一次,并相应调整日粮量。在每个阶段开始和结束时,通过瘤胃插管收集瘤胃液,检测 pH 值、氨氮和挥发性脂肪酸 (VFA)。在每个阶段结束时收集粪便样本,以测定总养分消化率。所测得的任何生长参数都不存在处理与时期的交互作用(P > 0.10)。饲喂两种日粮的阉牛的体格生长参数增长相似(P > 0.10)。饲喂两种日粮的母牛体重和增重相似(P > 0.10)。饲喂 LOW 日粮的母牛平均日增重有了数值上的提高,同时瘤胃 pH 值和剩余 VFAs 浓度也有上升趋势(P P P > 0.10)。饲喂两种缓冲剂添加率的陡坡牛的 DM 和有机物消化率相似(P > 0.10)。限制饲喂高 DDGS 添加率比率和低缓冲剂添加率可提高饲料效率,同时保持生长性能。研究假设被否定,即在饲喂高 DDGS 日粮时,饲喂低碳酸钙缓冲剂可提高饲料效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信