Racial-ethnicity group distributions of blood product use in acute trauma care transfusion.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1111/trf.18030
Tristan Wisont, Zhinan Liu, Zaher Kmail, Lynn G Stansbury, M Angele Theard, Monica S Vavilala, John R Hess
{"title":"Racial-ethnicity group distributions of blood product use in acute trauma care transfusion.","authors":"Tristan Wisont, Zhinan Liu, Zaher Kmail, Lynn G Stansbury, M Angele Theard, Monica S Vavilala, John R Hess","doi":"10.1111/trf.18030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent studies suggest Black patients are transfused less often and at lower hemoglobin levels than White patients. In elective surgery, Black and Non-White patients have greater estimated blood loss and transfusion frequency. We asked whether similar transfusion disparities are observable in acute trauma resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center retrospective analysis of trauma registry/blood-bank-linked data from a large US trauma center, we identified all acute trauma patients 2011-2022. Our data sources permitted distinction of Race and Ethnicity and therefor binning as Non-White-race/not Hispanic plus any-race/Hispanic or White/not Hispanic. We tallied Injury Severity Scores mild through profound (ISS 1-9, 9-15, 16-25, >25), type (blunt vs. penetrating) and mechanism (firearms, etc.), and associated blood use overall and in the first, first four, and first 24 h, comparing results with chi square, p < .01.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 50,394 (68.41%) acute trauma patients were classified as White and 23,251 (31.7%) as Other than White. White patients were more likely to receive any blood products (17.8% vs. 11.9%), but, for all measures of urgency/quantity, Non-White patients were transfused more often (respectively, first 4 h, 51.9% vs. 42.1%; ≥3u/first hour, 18.5% vs. 11.0%; ≥10u/24 h, 8.1% vs. 3.8%) (all p < .001). White patients were far more likely to have blunt injury than Non-White patients, (77.2% vs. 42.6%), less likely to have penetrating injury (10.1% vs. 14%) and far less likely to be injured by firearms (30.6% vs. 56.9%) (all p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At our center, blood use in acute trauma resuscitation was associated with injury severity and mechanism, not race/ethnicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent studies suggest Black patients are transfused less often and at lower hemoglobin levels than White patients. In elective surgery, Black and Non-White patients have greater estimated blood loss and transfusion frequency. We asked whether similar transfusion disparities are observable in acute trauma resuscitation.

Methods: In a single-center retrospective analysis of trauma registry/blood-bank-linked data from a large US trauma center, we identified all acute trauma patients 2011-2022. Our data sources permitted distinction of Race and Ethnicity and therefor binning as Non-White-race/not Hispanic plus any-race/Hispanic or White/not Hispanic. We tallied Injury Severity Scores mild through profound (ISS 1-9, 9-15, 16-25, >25), type (blunt vs. penetrating) and mechanism (firearms, etc.), and associated blood use overall and in the first, first four, and first 24 h, comparing results with chi square, p < .01.

Results: Overall, 50,394 (68.41%) acute trauma patients were classified as White and 23,251 (31.7%) as Other than White. White patients were more likely to receive any blood products (17.8% vs. 11.9%), but, for all measures of urgency/quantity, Non-White patients were transfused more often (respectively, first 4 h, 51.9% vs. 42.1%; ≥3u/first hour, 18.5% vs. 11.0%; ≥10u/24 h, 8.1% vs. 3.8%) (all p < .001). White patients were far more likely to have blunt injury than Non-White patients, (77.2% vs. 42.6%), less likely to have penetrating injury (10.1% vs. 14%) and far less likely to be injured by firearms (30.6% vs. 56.9%) (all p < .001).

Conclusions: At our center, blood use in acute trauma resuscitation was associated with injury severity and mechanism, not race/ethnicity.

急性创伤救护输血中血液制品使用的种族-族裔群体分布。
背景:最近的研究表明,黑人患者的输血频率和血红蛋白水平低于白人患者。在择期手术中,黑人和非白人患者的估计失血量和输血频率更高。我们想知道在急性创伤复苏中是否也存在类似的输血差异:我们对美国一家大型创伤中心的创伤登记/血库链接数据进行了单中心回顾性分析,确定了 2011-2022 年的所有急性创伤患者。我们的数据源允许区分种族和民族,因此可以将其分为非白人种族/非西班牙裔、任何种族/西班牙裔或白人/非西班牙裔。我们统计了从轻度到重度的伤害严重程度评分(ISS 1-9、9-15、16-25、>25)、伤害类型(钝伤与穿透伤)和伤害机制(枪支等),以及总体和最初、最初 4 小时和最初 24 小时的相关用血情况,并将结果与秩方进行了比较,P 结果:总体而言,50,394 名(68.41%)急性创伤患者被归类为白人,23,251 名(31.7%)被归类为非白人。白人患者更有可能接受任何血液制品(17.8% 对 11.9%),但就所有紧急程度/数量而言,非白人患者接受输血的频率更高(分别为:前 4 小时,51.9% 对 42.1%;≥3u/1 小时,18.5% 对 11.0%;≥10u/24 小时,8.1% 对 3.8%)(均为 p 结论:在我们的中心,急性创伤患者的血液使用情况与白人患者的差异很大:在我们中心,急性创伤复苏中的用血量与损伤严重程度和机制有关,而与种族/民族无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信