Undergraduate rheumatology teaching in the UK: a survey of current practice by teachers and students.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkae112
Pippa Watson, David Hanna, Sophia M Wakefield, David Coady, Donna Andrew, Daisy Southam, Richard J Wakefield
{"title":"Undergraduate rheumatology teaching in the UK: a survey of current practice by teachers and students.","authors":"Pippa Watson, David Hanna, Sophia M Wakefield, David Coady, Donna Andrew, Daisy Southam, Richard J Wakefield","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The last major UK survey of medical undergraduate rheumatology teaching was 25 years ago. This study aimed to describe current teaching practice, the perceptions of teachers and students and their engagement with Versus Arthritis teaching resources and future challenges and opportunities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic surveys were distributed by e-mail and/or social media to relevant teachers and students identified within all 37 UK medical schools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34/37 (91%) teacher and 30/37 (81%) student surveys were returned. Compared with the last survey, the proportion of schools delivering rheumatology-identifiable teaching has fallen from 100% to 86% and the mean number of teaching days from 30 to 10. Rheumatology teaching is now more dispersed throughout the curriculum. Students preferred active learning methods such as simulation and expert patient teaching, while teachers preferred small-group teaching, online learning and lectures. The Versus Arthritis resources appeared underutilized by students but were considered useful. Most students thought rheumatology careers were not promoted within their medical school.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A decrease in dedicated rheumatology teaching time was noted since the last survey 25 years ago. Greater promotion of rheumatology as a speciality and future career is required to maintain its professional identity and prevent marginalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"8 4","pages":"rkae112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The last major UK survey of medical undergraduate rheumatology teaching was 25 years ago. This study aimed to describe current teaching practice, the perceptions of teachers and students and their engagement with Versus Arthritis teaching resources and future challenges and opportunities.

Methods: Electronic surveys were distributed by e-mail and/or social media to relevant teachers and students identified within all 37 UK medical schools.

Results: A total of 34/37 (91%) teacher and 30/37 (81%) student surveys were returned. Compared with the last survey, the proportion of schools delivering rheumatology-identifiable teaching has fallen from 100% to 86% and the mean number of teaching days from 30 to 10. Rheumatology teaching is now more dispersed throughout the curriculum. Students preferred active learning methods such as simulation and expert patient teaching, while teachers preferred small-group teaching, online learning and lectures. The Versus Arthritis resources appeared underutilized by students but were considered useful. Most students thought rheumatology careers were not promoted within their medical school.

Conclusion: A decrease in dedicated rheumatology teaching time was noted since the last survey 25 years ago. Greater promotion of rheumatology as a speciality and future career is required to maintain its professional identity and prevent marginalization.

英国风湿病学本科教学:教师和学生当前实践调查。
目的:英国上一次对风湿病学本科医学教学进行大规模调查是在 25 年前。本研究旨在描述当前的教学实践、教师和学生的看法、他们对 Versus Arthritis 教学资源的使用情况以及未来的挑战和机遇:方法:通过电子邮件和/或社交媒体向英国所有 37 所医学院的相关教师和学生发放电子调查问卷:共收回 34/37 份(91%)教师调查问卷和 30/37 份(81%)学生调查问卷。与上次调查相比,开展风湿病学教学的学校比例从100%降至86%,平均教学天数从30天降至10天。风湿病学教学现在更加分散在整个课程中。学生更喜欢模拟教学和专家病人教学等主动学习方法,而教师则更喜欢小组教学、在线学习和讲座。学生对 "Versus Arthritis "资源的利用率较低,但认为该资源很有用。大多数学生认为风湿病学职业在医学院内没有得到推广:结论:自 25 年前的上一次调查以来,风湿病学的专门教学时间有所减少。要保持风湿病学的专业特性并防止其被边缘化,就必须加大对风湿病学这一专科和未来职业的宣传力度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信