Psychometric Properties of Different Short Forms of Social Interaction Anxiety Scale in Chinese College Students.

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S486245
Qian Song, Kaili Zheng, Zixia Ding, Zhengmiao Miao, Zhaoxia Liu, Ming Cheng, Jinyao Yi
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of Different Short Forms of Social Interaction Anxiety Scale in Chinese College Students.","authors":"Qian Song, Kaili Zheng, Zixia Ding, Zhengmiao Miao, Zhaoxia Liu, Ming Cheng, Jinyao Yi","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S486245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There exist four short forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS): 10-item version (SIAS-10), 6-item version by Peters et al (SIAS-6P), 6-item version by Fergus et al (SIAS-6F), and 5-item version (SIAS-5). This study aims to comprehensively examine the psychometric properties of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, and SIAS-5 and to determine which one performs relatively better in Chinese population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 733 Chinese college students. The unidimensionality of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, SIAS-5 was examined using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Multi-Group CFA was further adopted to assess measurement equivalence across gender. Internal consistency reliability and criteria-related validity were also evaluated. Additionally, the measurement performance of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, and SIAS-5 was assessed with Item Response Theory (IRT), which estimated the discrimination parameter and the Item Characteristic Curve (ICC) for each item.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Except for the SIAS-5, the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, and SIAS-6F displayed a good-fit to the one-factor model. Furthermore, the SIAS-10 achieved strict equivalence across gender while other versions did not. The SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F and SIAS-5 all had acceptable internal consistency and significant correlations with criteria scales. The IRT results showed that the SIAS-10 included more items with higher discrimination and peaked ICCs (indicating more informative), whereas the SIAS-6P included more items with lower discrimination and flat ICCs (indicating less informative).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For assessing social anxiety in Chinese under constrained conditions, the SIAS-10 is recommended to clinicians for it measuring equivalently across gender, reflecting the relevant criteria variables well, and discriminating various levels of social anxiety sensitively.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"17 ","pages":"3405-3418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S486245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There exist four short forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS): 10-item version (SIAS-10), 6-item version by Peters et al (SIAS-6P), 6-item version by Fergus et al (SIAS-6F), and 5-item version (SIAS-5). This study aims to comprehensively examine the psychometric properties of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, and SIAS-5 and to determine which one performs relatively better in Chinese population.

Methods: This study enrolled 733 Chinese college students. The unidimensionality of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, SIAS-5 was examined using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Multi-Group CFA was further adopted to assess measurement equivalence across gender. Internal consistency reliability and criteria-related validity were also evaluated. Additionally, the measurement performance of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, and SIAS-5 was assessed with Item Response Theory (IRT), which estimated the discrimination parameter and the Item Characteristic Curve (ICC) for each item.

Results: Except for the SIAS-5, the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, and SIAS-6F displayed a good-fit to the one-factor model. Furthermore, the SIAS-10 achieved strict equivalence across gender while other versions did not. The SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F and SIAS-5 all had acceptable internal consistency and significant correlations with criteria scales. The IRT results showed that the SIAS-10 included more items with higher discrimination and peaked ICCs (indicating more informative), whereas the SIAS-6P included more items with lower discrimination and flat ICCs (indicating less informative).

Conclusion: For assessing social anxiety in Chinese under constrained conditions, the SIAS-10 is recommended to clinicians for it measuring equivalently across gender, reflecting the relevant criteria variables well, and discriminating various levels of social anxiety sensitively.

中国大学生社交互动焦虑量表不同简表的心理测量学特性
背景:社会交往焦虑量表(SIAS)有四种简表:10个项目版(SIAS-10)、彼得斯等人的6个项目版(SIAS-6P)、弗格斯等人的6个项目版(SIAS-6F)和5个项目版(SIAS-5)。本研究旨在全面考察 SIAS-10、SIAS-6P、SIAS-6F 和 SIAS-5 的心理测量学特性,并确定哪一个在中国人群中表现相对更好:本研究共招募了 733 名中国大学生。采用确认性因子分析(CFA)检验了 SIAS-10、SIAS-6P、SIAS-6F 和 SIAS-5 的单维性。此外,还采用了多组 CFA 方法来评估不同性别间的测量等效性。同时还评估了内部一致性信度和标准相关效度。此外,还采用项目反应理论(IRT)评估了SIAS-10、SIAS-6P、SIAS-6F和SIAS-5的测量性能,估计了每个项目的区分参数和项目特征曲线(ICC):结果:除 SIAS-5 外,SIAS-10、SIAS-6P 和 SIAS-6F 均与单因素模型拟合良好。此外,SIAS-10 在不同性别间实现了严格的等效性,而其他版本则没有。SIAS-10、SIAS-6P、SIAS-6F 和 SIAS-5 均具有可接受的内部一致性以及与标准量表的显著相关性。IRT结果显示,SIAS-10包含了更多具有较高区分度和峰值ICCs(表示信息量更大)的项目,而SIAS-6P包含了更多具有较低区分度和平坦ICCs(表示信息量较小)的项目:结论:对于在有限条件下评估中国人的社交焦虑,SIAS-10 具有跨性别测量等效、能很好地反映相关标准变量、能敏感地区分不同程度的社交焦虑等优点,值得推荐给临床医生使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信