Neurocognitive Disorders and Cognitive Reserve: a Study on a Psychiatric Rehabilitation Patients Sample.

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Psychiatria Danubina Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Antonella Vacca, Maria Vincenza Minò, Antonella Litta, Roberto Longo, Mario Vetrano, Giovanna Lucisani, Barbara Solomita, Debora Benazzi, Mariangela Perito, Andreana Franza, Francesco Franza
{"title":"Neurocognitive Disorders and Cognitive Reserve: a Study on a Psychiatric Rehabilitation Patients Sample.","authors":"Antonella Vacca, Maria Vincenza Minò, Antonella Litta, Roberto Longo, Mario Vetrano, Giovanna Lucisani, Barbara Solomita, Debora Benazzi, Mariangela Perito, Andreana Franza, Francesco Franza","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on neurocognitive disorders and cognitive reserve in psychiatric rehabilitation patients is crucial to understanding how cognitive function impacts rehabilitation outcomes. Cognitive reserve refers to the brain's resilience to neuropathological damage, and exploring its role in psychiatric patients can provide insights into their varying responses to treatment and recovery potential. Investigating whether there are differences in cognitive reserve and neurocognitive disorders between offenders and non-offenders within psychiatric rehabilitation can help tailor interventions and improve rehabilitation strategies. This study explores cognitive reserve (CR) and neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) in a sample of psychiatric patients within a Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center, with a particular focus on differences between offenders and non-offenders following the closure of Judicial Psychiatric Hospitals in Italy (March 31, 2015).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In our observational study, were recruited a total of 59 patients (20 females and 39 males, mean age = 45.39 years) from various Psychiatric Rehabilitation Communities in Southern Italy. The patients were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5 CV) and a battery of tests, including in particular the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicated significant differences between offenders and non-offenders in cognitive reserve, psychopathological symptoms and personal and social functionality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding these distinctions is important for developing specialized therapeutic approaches that address the rehabilitation needs of each group that also include neurocognitive aspects such as cognitive reserve.</p>","PeriodicalId":20760,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Danubina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Danubina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research on neurocognitive disorders and cognitive reserve in psychiatric rehabilitation patients is crucial to understanding how cognitive function impacts rehabilitation outcomes. Cognitive reserve refers to the brain's resilience to neuropathological damage, and exploring its role in psychiatric patients can provide insights into their varying responses to treatment and recovery potential. Investigating whether there are differences in cognitive reserve and neurocognitive disorders between offenders and non-offenders within psychiatric rehabilitation can help tailor interventions and improve rehabilitation strategies. This study explores cognitive reserve (CR) and neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) in a sample of psychiatric patients within a Psychiatric Rehabilitation Center, with a particular focus on differences between offenders and non-offenders following the closure of Judicial Psychiatric Hospitals in Italy (March 31, 2015).

Method: In our observational study, were recruited a total of 59 patients (20 females and 39 males, mean age = 45.39 years) from various Psychiatric Rehabilitation Communities in Southern Italy. The patients were assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5 CV) and a battery of tests, including in particular the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire (CRIq), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).

Results: Results indicated significant differences between offenders and non-offenders in cognitive reserve, psychopathological symptoms and personal and social functionality.

Conclusion: Understanding these distinctions is important for developing specialized therapeutic approaches that address the rehabilitation needs of each group that also include neurocognitive aspects such as cognitive reserve.

神经认知障碍与认知储备:精神病康复患者样本研究。
背景:对精神病康复患者的神经认知障碍和认知储备进行研究,对于了解认知功能如何影响康复效果至关重要。认知储备指的是大脑对神经病理损伤的恢复能力,探究认知储备在精神病患者中的作用可以深入了解他们对治疗的不同反应和康复潜力。调查精神病康复患者中的罪犯和非罪犯在认知储备和神经认知障碍方面是否存在差异,有助于定制干预措施和改进康复策略。本研究探讨了精神病康复中心精神病患者样本的认知储备(CR)和神经认知障碍(NCDs),尤其关注意大利司法精神病医院关闭(2015年3月31日)后罪犯和非罪犯之间的差异:在我们的观察性研究中,我们从意大利南部的多个精神病康复社区共招募了 59 名患者(20 名女性和 39 名男性,平均年龄 = 45.39 岁)。研究人员使用 DSM-5 结构化临床访谈(SCID-5 CV)和一系列测试对患者进行了评估,其中特别包括认知储备指数问卷(CRIq)、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、异常显著性量表(ASI)和世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0):结果表明,罪犯和非罪犯在认知储备、精神病理症状以及个人和社会功能方面存在明显差异:结论:了解这些差异对于制定专门的治疗方法非常重要,这些方法可以满足每个群体的康复需求,其中也包括认知储备等神经认知方面的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatria Danubina
Psychiatria Danubina 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatria Danubina is a peer-reviewed open access journal of the Psychiatric Danubian Association, aimed to publish original scientific contributions in psychiatry, psychological medicine and related science (neurosciences, biological, psychological, and social sciences as well as philosophy of science and medical ethics, history, organization and economics of mental health services).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信