[Interventions for Escalating Crisis Situations in Inpatient Acute Psychiatric Treatment - Results of a Content Analysis of Joint Crisis Plans].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Jacqueline Rixe, Eva Neumann, Marnie Melissa Bosch, Michael Schulz, Georg Juckel, Martin Driessen
{"title":"[Interventions for Escalating Crisis Situations in Inpatient Acute Psychiatric Treatment - Results of a Content Analysis of Joint Crisis Plans].","authors":"Jacqueline Rixe, Eva Neumann, Marnie Melissa Bosch, Michael Schulz, Georg Juckel, Martin Driessen","doi":"10.1055/a-2388-8955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identification of interventions to prevent coercive measures in the event of escalating crisis situations in an inpatient acute psychiatric treatment context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Content analysis of 98 joint crisis plans (JCP) using frequency analysis (secondary data analysis).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In over half of the joint crisis plans, withdrawal to a low-stimulation environment (64.3%), a conversation (62.2%), and a walk (57.1%) were agreed upon as intervention for escalating crisis situations. A significant difference (p=0.020) was found in relation to the intake of (on-demand) medication, which was determined exclusively by males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results provide potentially helpful suggestions for escalating crisis situations and gender-specific findings with regard to the agreed interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2388-8955","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Identification of interventions to prevent coercive measures in the event of escalating crisis situations in an inpatient acute psychiatric treatment context.

Methods: Content analysis of 98 joint crisis plans (JCP) using frequency analysis (secondary data analysis).

Results: In over half of the joint crisis plans, withdrawal to a low-stimulation environment (64.3%), a conversation (62.2%), and a walk (57.1%) were agreed upon as intervention for escalating crisis situations. A significant difference (p=0.020) was found in relation to the intake of (on-demand) medication, which was determined exclusively by males.

Conclusions: The results provide potentially helpful suggestions for escalating crisis situations and gender-specific findings with regard to the agreed interventions.

[急性精神病住院治疗中危机升级情况的干预措施--联合危机计划的内容分析结果]。
目的方法:采用频率分析(二次数据分析)对 98 份联合危机计划(JCP)进行内容分析:方法:使用频率分析法(二次数据分析)对 98 份联合危机计划(JCP)进行内容分析:结果:在超过一半的联合危机处理计划中,都同意将撤至低刺激环境(64.3%)、谈话(62.2%)和散步(57.1%)作为危机升级情况下的干预措施。在(按需)服药方面发现了明显的差异(p=0.020),这完全是由男性决定的:研究结果为危机情况的升级提供了可能有用的建议,并就商定的干预措施得出了有性别区分的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信