[Interventions for Escalating Crisis Situations in Inpatient Acute Psychiatric Treatment - Results of a Content Analysis of Joint Crisis Plans].

IF 1.1 4区医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY

Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1055/a-2388-8955

Jacqueline Rixe, Eva Neumann, Marnie Melissa Bosch, Michael Schulz, Georg Juckel, Martin Driessen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Identification of interventions to prevent coercive measures in the event of escalating crisis situations in an inpatient acute psychiatric treatment context.

Methods: Content analysis of 98 joint crisis plans (JCP) using frequency analysis (secondary data analysis).

Results: In over half of the joint crisis plans, withdrawal to a low-stimulation environment (64.3%), a conversation (62.2%), and a walk (57.1%) were agreed upon as intervention for escalating crisis situations. A significant difference (p=0.020) was found in relation to the intake of (on-demand) medication, which was determined exclusively by males.

Conclusions: The results provide potentially helpful suggestions for escalating crisis situations and gender-specific findings with regard to the agreed interventions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[急性精神病住院治疗中危机升级情况的干预措施--联合危机计划的内容分析结果]。

目的方法：采用频率分析（二次数据分析）对 98 份联合危机计划（JCP）进行内容分析：方法：使用频率分析法（二次数据分析）对 98 份联合危机计划（JCP）进行内容分析：结果：在超过一半的联合危机处理计划中，都同意将撤至低刺激环境（64.3%）、谈话（62.2%）和散步（57.1%）作为危机升级情况下的干预措施。在（按需）服药方面发现了明显的差异（p=0.020），这完全是由男性决定的：研究结果为危机情况的升级提供了可能有用的建议，并就商定的干预措施得出了有性别区分的结论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-

CiteScore

3.90

自引率

9.10%

发文量

103

期刊介绍： Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien