[Developing An Initial Best Practice Model For Inpatient Equivalent Psychiatric Home Treatment From The Perspective Of Service Users: Consensus Process With Participatory Features].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Julian Schwarz, Kim Scheunemann, Hannah Mundry, Emma Kula, Nadine Randzio, Marie Salzmann, Gerhard Längle, Svenja Raschmann, Martin Holzke, Peter Brieger, Johannes Hamann, Olaf Hardt, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Simon Senner, Janina Richter, Jürgen Timm, Reinhold Kilian, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Stefan Weinmann, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter
{"title":"[Developing An Initial Best Practice Model For Inpatient Equivalent Psychiatric Home Treatment From The Perspective Of Service Users: Consensus Process With Participatory Features].","authors":"Julian Schwarz, Kim Scheunemann, Hannah Mundry, Emma Kula, Nadine Randzio, Marie Salzmann, Gerhard Längle, Svenja Raschmann, Martin Holzke, Peter Brieger, Johannes Hamann, Olaf Hardt, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Simon Senner, Janina Richter, Jürgen Timm, Reinhold Kilian, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Stefan Weinmann, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter","doi":"10.1055/a-2406-9128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Inpatient-Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT) for mental health is new in Germany and therefore requires quality development. A best practice model (BPM) for IEHT is being developed from a service user perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1. Collection and organization of evidence (literature review; n=55 interviews with service users), 2. qualitative analysis and formulation of criteria; 3. consensus and grouping of criteria (Delphi process).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 Best practice criteria were developed in 8 groups: 1. Information, access and crisis management; 2. Treatment framework, end of treatment and continuity; 3. Scheduling, organization of contacts and flexibility; 4. Practical support and activation; 5. Treatment and therapy services; 6. Treatment team and staff; 7. Relatives, caregivers and community; and 8. Privacy and behavior in the home environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BPM provides initial guidance for a user-centered assessment of the implementation of IEHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2406-9128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Inpatient-Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT) for mental health is new in Germany and therefore requires quality development. A best practice model (BPM) for IEHT is being developed from a service user perspective.

Methods: 1. Collection and organization of evidence (literature review; n=55 interviews with service users), 2. qualitative analysis and formulation of criteria; 3. consensus and grouping of criteria (Delphi process).

Results: 58 Best practice criteria were developed in 8 groups: 1. Information, access and crisis management; 2. Treatment framework, end of treatment and continuity; 3. Scheduling, organization of contacts and flexibility; 4. Practical support and activation; 5. Treatment and therapy services; 6. Treatment team and staff; 7. Relatives, caregivers and community; and 8. Privacy and behavior in the home environment.

Conclusion: The BPM provides initial guidance for a user-centered assessment of the implementation of IEHT.

[从服务使用者的角度制定相当于住院治疗的精神病家庭治疗的初步最佳实践模式:具有参与特征的共识过程]。
目的:在德国,精神疾病的住院病人等同家庭治疗(IEHT)是一项新技术,因此需要进行高质量的开发。方法:1.收集和整理证据(文献综述;对 55 名服务使用者的访谈);2.定性分析和制定标准;3.达成共识和标准分组(德尔菲过程):58 项最佳实践标准共分为 8 组:1.信息、获取和危机管理;2.治疗框架、治疗结束和连续性;3.时间安排、联系组织和灵活性;4.实际支持和激活;5.治疗和治疗服务;6.治疗团队和工作人员;7.亲属、照顾者和社区;以及 8.家庭环境中的隐私和行为。家庭环境中的隐私和行为:BPM 为以用户为中心评估综合家庭护理方法的实施情况提供了初步指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信