[Developing An Initial Best Practice Model For Inpatient Equivalent Psychiatric Home Treatment From The Perspective Of Service Users: Consensus Process With Participatory Features].
Julian Schwarz, Kim Scheunemann, Hannah Mundry, Emma Kula, Nadine Randzio, Marie Salzmann, Gerhard Längle, Svenja Raschmann, Martin Holzke, Peter Brieger, Johannes Hamann, Olaf Hardt, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Simon Senner, Janina Richter, Jürgen Timm, Reinhold Kilian, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Stefan Weinmann, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter
{"title":"[Developing An Initial Best Practice Model For Inpatient Equivalent Psychiatric Home Treatment From The Perspective Of Service Users: Consensus Process With Participatory Features].","authors":"Julian Schwarz, Kim Scheunemann, Hannah Mundry, Emma Kula, Nadine Randzio, Marie Salzmann, Gerhard Längle, Svenja Raschmann, Martin Holzke, Peter Brieger, Johannes Hamann, Olaf Hardt, Sandeep Rout, Constance Hirschmeier, Uwe Herwig, Simon Senner, Janina Richter, Jürgen Timm, Reinhold Kilian, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Stefan Weinmann, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter","doi":"10.1055/a-2406-9128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Inpatient-Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT) for mental health is new in Germany and therefore requires quality development. A best practice model (BPM) for IEHT is being developed from a service user perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1. Collection and organization of evidence (literature review; n=55 interviews with service users), 2. qualitative analysis and formulation of criteria; 3. consensus and grouping of criteria (Delphi process).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>58 Best practice criteria were developed in 8 groups: 1. Information, access and crisis management; 2. Treatment framework, end of treatment and continuity; 3. Scheduling, organization of contacts and flexibility; 4. Practical support and activation; 5. Treatment and therapy services; 6. Treatment team and staff; 7. Relatives, caregivers and community; and 8. Privacy and behavior in the home environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BPM provides initial guidance for a user-centered assessment of the implementation of IEHT.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2406-9128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Inpatient-Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT) for mental health is new in Germany and therefore requires quality development. A best practice model (BPM) for IEHT is being developed from a service user perspective.
Methods: 1. Collection and organization of evidence (literature review; n=55 interviews with service users), 2. qualitative analysis and formulation of criteria; 3. consensus and grouping of criteria (Delphi process).
Results: 58 Best practice criteria were developed in 8 groups: 1. Information, access and crisis management; 2. Treatment framework, end of treatment and continuity; 3. Scheduling, organization of contacts and flexibility; 4. Practical support and activation; 5. Treatment and therapy services; 6. Treatment team and staff; 7. Relatives, caregivers and community; and 8. Privacy and behavior in the home environment.
Conclusion: The BPM provides initial guidance for a user-centered assessment of the implementation of IEHT.