Rating pome fruit quality traits using deep learning and image processing.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant Direct Pub Date : 2024-10-08 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/pld3.70005
Nhan H Nguyen, Joseph Michaud, Rene Mogollon, Huiting Zhang, Heidi Hargarten, Rachel Leisso, Carolina A Torres, Loren Honaas, Stephen Ficklin
{"title":"Rating pome fruit quality traits using deep learning and image processing.","authors":"Nhan H Nguyen, Joseph Michaud, Rene Mogollon, Huiting Zhang, Heidi Hargarten, Rachel Leisso, Carolina A Torres, Loren Honaas, Stephen Ficklin","doi":"10.1002/pld3.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality assessment of pome fruits (i.e. apples and pears) is used not only for determining the optimal harvest time but also for the progression of fruit-quality attributes during storage. Therefore, it is typical to repeatedly evaluate fruits during the course of a postharvest experiment. This evaluation often includes careful visual assessments of fruit for apparent defects and physiological symptoms. A general best practice for quality assessment is to rate fruit using the same individual rater or group of individual raters to reduce bias. However, such consistency across labs, facilities, and experiments is often not feasible or attainable. Moreover, while these visual assessments are critical empirical data, they are often coarse-grained and lack consistent objective criteria. Granny, is a tool designed for rating fruit using machine-learning and image-processing to address rater bias and improve resolution. Additionally, Granny supports backward compatibility by providing ratings compatible with long-established standards and references, promoting research program continuity. Current Granny ratings include starch content assessment, rating levels of peel defects, and peel color analyses. Integrative analyses enhanced by Granny's improved resolution and reduced bias, such as linking fruit outcomes to global scale -omics data, environmental changes, and other quantitative fruit quality metrics like soluble solids content and flesh firmness, will further enrich our understanding of fruit quality dynamics. Lastly, Granny is open-source and freely available.</p>","PeriodicalId":20230,"journal":{"name":"Plant Direct","volume":"8 10","pages":"e70005"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Direct","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality assessment of pome fruits (i.e. apples and pears) is used not only for determining the optimal harvest time but also for the progression of fruit-quality attributes during storage. Therefore, it is typical to repeatedly evaluate fruits during the course of a postharvest experiment. This evaluation often includes careful visual assessments of fruit for apparent defects and physiological symptoms. A general best practice for quality assessment is to rate fruit using the same individual rater or group of individual raters to reduce bias. However, such consistency across labs, facilities, and experiments is often not feasible or attainable. Moreover, while these visual assessments are critical empirical data, they are often coarse-grained and lack consistent objective criteria. Granny, is a tool designed for rating fruit using machine-learning and image-processing to address rater bias and improve resolution. Additionally, Granny supports backward compatibility by providing ratings compatible with long-established standards and references, promoting research program continuity. Current Granny ratings include starch content assessment, rating levels of peel defects, and peel color analyses. Integrative analyses enhanced by Granny's improved resolution and reduced bias, such as linking fruit outcomes to global scale -omics data, environmental changes, and other quantitative fruit quality metrics like soluble solids content and flesh firmness, will further enrich our understanding of fruit quality dynamics. Lastly, Granny is open-source and freely available.

利用深度学习和图像处理评定梨果的品质特征。
梨果(即苹果和梨)的质量评估不仅用于确定最佳采收时间,还用于评估贮藏期间果实质量属性的变化。因此,典型的做法是在采后实验过程中反复评估水果。这种评估通常包括对果实的明显缺陷和生理症状进行仔细的目测评估。质量评估的一般最佳做法是使用相同的单个评定者或单个评定者小组对水果进行评定,以减少偏差。然而,在不同的实验室、设施和实验中,这种一致性往往是不可行或无法实现的。此外,虽然这些目测评估是重要的经验数据,但它们通常粒度较粗,缺乏一致的客观标准。Granny 是一款专为水果评级而设计的工具,它利用机器学习和图像处理技术来解决评级者的偏差并提高分辨率。此外,Granny 还支持向后兼容,提供与长期确立的标准和参考兼容的评级,促进研究计划的连续性。Granny 目前的评级包括淀粉含量评估、果皮缺陷评级和果皮颜色分析。Granny 提高了分辨率,减少了偏差,从而加强了综合分析,例如将水果结果与全球范围的组学数据、环境变化以及可溶性固形物含量和果肉硬度等其他定量水果质量指标联系起来,这将进一步丰富我们对水果质量动态的了解。最后,Granny 是开源的,可以免费获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Direct
Plant Direct Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
101
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Direct is a monthly, sound science journal for the plant sciences that gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting work dealing with a variety of subjects. Topics include but are not limited to genetics, biochemistry, development, cell biology, biotic stress, abiotic stress, genomics, phenomics, bioinformatics, physiology, molecular biology, and evolution. A collaborative journal launched by the American Society of Plant Biologists, the Society for Experimental Biology and Wiley, Plant Direct publishes papers submitted directly to the journal as well as those referred from a select group of the societies’ journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信