Microstructural Characterization of Dry Powder Inhaler Formulations Using Orthogonal Analytical Techniques.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pharmaceutical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1007/s11095-024-03776-1
Gonçalo Farias, William J Ganley, Robert Price, Denise S Conti, Sharad Mangal, Elizabeth Bielski, Bryan Newman, Jagdeep Shur
{"title":"Microstructural Characterization of Dry Powder Inhaler Formulations Using Orthogonal Analytical Techniques.","authors":"Gonçalo Farias, William J Ganley, Robert Price, Denise S Conti, Sharad Mangal, Elizabeth Bielski, Bryan Newman, Jagdeep Shur","doi":"10.1007/s11095-024-03776-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For locally-acting dry powder inhalers (DPIs), developing novel analytical tools that are able to evaluate the state of aggregation may provide a better understanding of the impact of material properties and processing parameters on the in vivo performance. This study explored the utility of the Morphologically-Directed Raman Spectroscopy (MDRS) and dissolution as orthogonal techniques to assess microstructural equivalence of the aerosolized dose of DPIs collected with an aerosol collection device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Commercial DPIs containing different strengths of Fluticasone Propionate (FP) and Salmeterol Xinafoate (SX) as monotherapy and combination products were sourced from different regions. These inhalers were compared with aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD), dissolution, and MDRS studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>APSD testing alone might not be able to explain differences reported elsewhere in in vivo studies of commercial FP/SX drug products with different Advair® strengths and/or batches. Dissolution studies demonstrated different dissolution rates between Seretide™ 100/50 and Advair® 100/50, whereas Flixotide™ 100 and Flovent® 100 had similar dissolution rates between each other. These differences in dissolution profiles were supported by MDRS results: the dissolution rate is increased if the fraction of FP associated with high soluble components is increased. Principle component analysis was used to identify the agglomerate classes that better discriminate different products.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MDRS and dissolution studies of the aerosolized dose of DPIs were successfully used as orthogonal techniques. This study highlights the importance of further assessing in vitro tools that are able to provide a bridge between material attributes or process parameters and in vivo performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":20027,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Research","volume":" ","pages":"2015-2029"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-024-03776-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: For locally-acting dry powder inhalers (DPIs), developing novel analytical tools that are able to evaluate the state of aggregation may provide a better understanding of the impact of material properties and processing parameters on the in vivo performance. This study explored the utility of the Morphologically-Directed Raman Spectroscopy (MDRS) and dissolution as orthogonal techniques to assess microstructural equivalence of the aerosolized dose of DPIs collected with an aerosol collection device.

Methods: Commercial DPIs containing different strengths of Fluticasone Propionate (FP) and Salmeterol Xinafoate (SX) as monotherapy and combination products were sourced from different regions. These inhalers were compared with aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD), dissolution, and MDRS studies.

Results: APSD testing alone might not be able to explain differences reported elsewhere in in vivo studies of commercial FP/SX drug products with different Advair® strengths and/or batches. Dissolution studies demonstrated different dissolution rates between Seretide™ 100/50 and Advair® 100/50, whereas Flixotide™ 100 and Flovent® 100 had similar dissolution rates between each other. These differences in dissolution profiles were supported by MDRS results: the dissolution rate is increased if the fraction of FP associated with high soluble components is increased. Principle component analysis was used to identify the agglomerate classes that better discriminate different products.

Conclusions: MDRS and dissolution studies of the aerosolized dose of DPIs were successfully used as orthogonal techniques. This study highlights the importance of further assessing in vitro tools that are able to provide a bridge between material attributes or process parameters and in vivo performance.

利用正交分析技术确定干粉吸入剂配方的微观结构特征
目的对于局部作用干粉吸入剂(DPIs)而言,开发能够评估聚集状态的新型分析工具可以更好地了解材料特性和加工参数对体内性能的影响。本研究探索了形态定向拉曼光谱(MDRS)和溶解度作为正交技术的实用性,以评估用气溶胶收集装置收集的 DPI 气溶胶剂量的微结构等效性:方法:从不同地区采购含有不同强度丙酸氟替卡松(FP)和辛纳福酸沙美特罗(SX)的商用干粉吸入器,作为单药和复方产品。对这些吸入器进行了气动粒度分布(APSD)、溶解度和 MDRS 研究比较:结果:仅进行空气动力粒度分布测试可能无法解释其他地方报告的不同Advair®强度和/或批次的商用FP/SX药物产品体内研究中存在的差异。溶出度研究表明,Seretide™ 100/50和Advair® 100/50的溶出率不同,而Flixotide™ 100和Flovent® 100的溶出率相似。溶出度曲线的这些差异得到了 MDRS 结果的支持:如果与高溶解度成分相关的 FP 分数增加,溶出率也会增加。主成分分析用于确定能更好区分不同产品的结块类别:结论:MDRS 和气雾剂溶出度研究被成功地用作正交技术。这项研究强调了进一步评估体外工具的重要性,这些工具能够在材料属性或工艺参数与体内性能之间架起一座桥梁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Research
Pharmaceutical Research 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.40%
发文量
276
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Research, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists, is committed to publishing novel research that is mechanism-based, hypothesis-driven and addresses significant issues in drug discovery, development and regulation. Current areas of interest include, but are not limited to: -(pre)formulation engineering and processing- computational biopharmaceutics- drug delivery and targeting- molecular biopharmaceutics and drug disposition (including cellular and molecular pharmacology)- pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics. Research may involve nonclinical and clinical studies, and utilize both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Studies on small drug molecules, pharmaceutical solid materials (including biomaterials, polymers and nanoparticles) biotechnology products (including genes, peptides, proteins and vaccines), and genetically engineered cells are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信