Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness in Pediatric Patients: A Critical Assessment of Usage Rate.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Otology & Neurotology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000004331
Robert J Macielak, Celine Richard, Prashant S Malhotra, Oliver F Adunka, Ursula M Findlen
{"title":"Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness in Pediatric Patients: A Critical Assessment of Usage Rate.","authors":"Robert J Macielak, Celine Richard, Prashant S Malhotra, Oliver F Adunka, Ursula M Findlen","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the usage rate of pediatric patients undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for single-sided deafness (SSD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care pediatric referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Pediatric patients who underwent CI for SSD.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>CI with requisite audiometric follow-up.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Device use and audiometric testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six patients were implanted for SSD between 8/2015 and 7/2023 at a median age of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 1.7-7.7 yr). The cause of hearing loss was unknown in the majority of cases (28 patients, 42%), with cytomegalovirus being the most common known cause (17 patients, 26%). Hearing loss was prelingual in 38 patients (58%). Post-implantation, 12 patients (18%) were identified as lost to follow-up. For the remaining 54 patients, the median length of audiometric follow-up was 1.4 years (interquartile range, 0.9-2.2 yr). At last evaluation, only 10 of these 54 patients (19%) were designated as users (≥6 h per day), and 13 patients (24%) were designated as limited users (>2 but <6 h per day). Of patients capable of performing speech-in-noise testing (n = 13), 11 patients (85%) showed improvement on BKB-SIN SNR-50 testing with their implant on versus off with a mean improvement of 3 dB. Notably, 4 of these 11 patients (36%) were categorized as nonusers despite this benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite audiometric benefit from CI in the pediatric SSD population, usage rates over time remain markedly lower than anticipated at a high-volume, well-resourced tertiary care pediatric center. No influencing factors were identified, warranting critical assessment to ensure appropriate resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"1122-1127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the usage rate of pediatric patients undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for single-sided deafness (SSD).

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary care pediatric referral center.

Patients: Pediatric patients who underwent CI for SSD.

Interventions: CI with requisite audiometric follow-up.

Main outcome measures: Device use and audiometric testing.

Results: Sixty-six patients were implanted for SSD between 8/2015 and 7/2023 at a median age of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 1.7-7.7 yr). The cause of hearing loss was unknown in the majority of cases (28 patients, 42%), with cytomegalovirus being the most common known cause (17 patients, 26%). Hearing loss was prelingual in 38 patients (58%). Post-implantation, 12 patients (18%) were identified as lost to follow-up. For the remaining 54 patients, the median length of audiometric follow-up was 1.4 years (interquartile range, 0.9-2.2 yr). At last evaluation, only 10 of these 54 patients (19%) were designated as users (≥6 h per day), and 13 patients (24%) were designated as limited users (>2 but <6 h per day). Of patients capable of performing speech-in-noise testing (n = 13), 11 patients (85%) showed improvement on BKB-SIN SNR-50 testing with their implant on versus off with a mean improvement of 3 dB. Notably, 4 of these 11 patients (36%) were categorized as nonusers despite this benefit.

Conclusions: Despite audiometric benefit from CI in the pediatric SSD population, usage rates over time remain markedly lower than anticipated at a high-volume, well-resourced tertiary care pediatric center. No influencing factors were identified, warranting critical assessment to ensure appropriate resource allocation.

人工耳蜗植入治疗小儿单侧耳聋:对使用率的严格评估。
研究目的评估因单侧耳聋(SSD)而接受人工耳蜗植入术(CI)的儿童患者的使用率:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:地点:三级儿科转诊中心:干预:主要结果测量:设备使用和听力测试:主要结果测量:设备使用和听力测试:结果:在 2015 年 8 月至 2023 年 7 月期间,66 名患者因 SSD 而接受了植入式人工耳蜗,中位年龄为 4.7 岁(四分位间范围为 1.7-7.7 岁)。大多数病例的听力损失原因不明(28 名患者,42%),巨细胞病毒是最常见的已知原因(17 名患者,26%)。38名患者(58%)的听力损失为舌前损失。植入手术后,12 名患者(18%)失去了随访机会。其余 54 名患者的听力随访时间中位数为 1.4 年(四分位间范围为 0.9-2.2 年)。在最后一次评估时,这 54 名患者中只有 10 人(19%)被认定为使用者(每天使用时间≥6 小时),13 人(24%)被认定为有限使用者(>2 小时,但得出结论:尽管在儿科 SSD 患者中使用 CI 有听力方面的益处,但在一个高流量、资源丰富的三级儿科医疗中心,随着时间的推移,使用率仍明显低于预期。没有发现影响因素,因此需要进行严格评估,以确保资源分配得当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信