Variability of the Microbiota in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
OTO Open Pub Date : 2024-10-08 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70029
Fabricio Ccami-Bernal, Fernanda Barriga-Chambi, Zhamanda N Ortiz-Benique, Evelyne Ferrary, Renato Torres
{"title":"Variability of the Microbiota in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Fabricio Ccami-Bernal, Fernanda Barriga-Chambi, Zhamanda N Ortiz-Benique, Evelyne Ferrary, Renato Torres","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is characterized by a persistent inflammation of the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa that could be potentially linked to a dysregulation between the microbiota and the immune system. We aim to explore general, methodological, and microbiological aspects of microbiota research in CRS compared to disease-free individuals.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>All studies comparing the composition of the resident microbiota of the sinonasal cavities in 2 groups: CRS and normal participants. We conducted systematic study selection, data extraction, and analysis first using the title and abstract, and then the full texts based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compiled and presented findings include sampling site and technique, and microbiological results such as the relative abundance and the variability of the composition of the microbiota in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven studies, using genomic identification with 16s RNA were analyzed. Case definitions primarily followed EPOS or AAO-HNS guidelines, with endoscopic swabs (82%), and middle meatus sampling (74%) being prevalent techniques. Despite relative abundance variability, patterns emerged across studies, indicating an increase in <i>Haemophilus</i> (19%) and <i>Pseudomonas</i> (11%), and decrease in <i>Propionibacterium</i> (15%) and <i>Anaerococcus</i> (11%). Another pattern was observed, showing a decreased alpha diversity (6/19; 22%) in CRS compared to normal individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While variations exist among studies, analysis of CRS microbiota suggests an association with dysbiosis, potentially contributing to chronic inflammation. Future research must prioritize standardized criteria for diagnostics and patient selection, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of CRS microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e70029"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is characterized by a persistent inflammation of the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa that could be potentially linked to a dysregulation between the microbiota and the immune system. We aim to explore general, methodological, and microbiological aspects of microbiota research in CRS compared to disease-free individuals.

Data sources: Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.

Review methods: All studies comparing the composition of the resident microbiota of the sinonasal cavities in 2 groups: CRS and normal participants. We conducted systematic study selection, data extraction, and analysis first using the title and abstract, and then the full texts based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Compiled and presented findings include sampling site and technique, and microbiological results such as the relative abundance and the variability of the composition of the microbiota in both groups.

Results: Twenty-seven studies, using genomic identification with 16s RNA were analyzed. Case definitions primarily followed EPOS or AAO-HNS guidelines, with endoscopic swabs (82%), and middle meatus sampling (74%) being prevalent techniques. Despite relative abundance variability, patterns emerged across studies, indicating an increase in Haemophilus (19%) and Pseudomonas (11%), and decrease in Propionibacterium (15%) and Anaerococcus (11%). Another pattern was observed, showing a decreased alpha diversity (6/19; 22%) in CRS compared to normal individuals.

Conclusion: While variations exist among studies, analysis of CRS microbiota suggests an association with dysbiosis, potentially contributing to chronic inflammation. Future research must prioritize standardized criteria for diagnostics and patient selection, fostering a more comprehensive understanding of CRS microbiota.

慢性鼻炎微生物群的变异性:范围综述。
目的:慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的特点是鼻腔和副鼻窦粘膜持续发炎,这可能与微生物群和免疫系统之间的失调有关。我们旨在探讨与无病个体相比,CRS 微生物群研究的一般、方法学和微生物学方面:数据来源:Embase、Ovid MEDLINE、PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science:所有比较两组鼻窦腔常驻微生物群组成的研究:CRS 和正常参与者。我们首先使用标题和摘要对研究进行了系统的筛选、数据提取和分析,然后根据预定义的纳入和排除标准对全文进行了分析。编译和展示的结果包括取样地点和技术,以及微生物学结果,如两组微生物群的相对丰度和组成的变异性:结果:分析了 27 项使用 16s RNA 进行基因组鉴定的研究。病例定义主要遵循 EPOS 或 AAO-HNS 指南,内窥镜拭子(82%)和中腔取样(74%)是最常用的技术。尽管相对丰度存在差异,但不同研究中出现的模式表明,嗜血杆菌(19%)和假单胞菌(11%)增多,而丙酸杆菌(15%)和厌氧菌(11%)减少。观察到的另一种模式显示,与正常人相比,CRS 中的α多样性减少(6/19;22%):结论:虽然各项研究之间存在差异,但对 CRS 微生物群的分析表明,CRS 与菌群失调有关,有可能导致慢性炎症。未来的研究必须优先考虑诊断和患者选择的标准化标准,促进对 CRS 微生物群更全面的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信