Targeting Method for rTMS for Treating Depression in Japanese Patients: A Comparison of the Standard, F3, and Neuronavigation Approaches.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1159/000541006
Banri Tsukuda, Shunichiro Ikeda, Shota Minami, Koji Katsura, Toshiyuki Shimizu, Tomohide Kame, Keiichiro Nishida, Masafumi Yoshimura, Toshihiko Kinoshita
{"title":"Targeting Method for rTMS for Treating Depression in Japanese Patients: A Comparison of the Standard, F3, and Neuronavigation Approaches.","authors":"Banri Tsukuda, Shunichiro Ikeda, Shota Minami, Koji Katsura, Toshiyuki Shimizu, Tomohide Kame, Keiichiro Nishida, Masafumi Yoshimura, Toshihiko Kinoshita","doi":"10.1159/000541006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) is a commonly targeted brain region for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression. The lDLPFC has been identified using the \"5-cm rule.\" However, identification of the lDLPFC may deviate from the ideal stimulation site localized by neuronavigation. Therefore, we aimed to compare this method with other methods and examine the relationship between deviation from the ideal stimulation site and treatment effects. While most existing studies have focused on participants of European descent, this study focused on Japanese participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study participants were 16 patients who underwent rTMS and had the stimulus location identified using the 5-cm method. The lDLPFC was identified by the F3 electrode position and neuronavigation in addition to the 5-cm rule, and these locations were compared. We then performed a correlation analysis of the distance between the sites identified by the 5-cm method and by neuronavigation, as well as changes in scores on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lDLPFC identified by the F3 site and neuronavigation was approximately 3 cm more anterolateral than that identified by the 5-cm method. A significant correlation was found between the distance between the sites identified by the 5-cm method and neuronavigation and the rate of change in HAMD-17 scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ideal stimulation site may be approximately 3 cm anterior to the site identified by the 5-cm method, and stimulation of the F3 site may be a valid alternative to the 5-cm method.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) is a commonly targeted brain region for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for depression. The lDLPFC has been identified using the "5-cm rule." However, identification of the lDLPFC may deviate from the ideal stimulation site localized by neuronavigation. Therefore, we aimed to compare this method with other methods and examine the relationship between deviation from the ideal stimulation site and treatment effects. While most existing studies have focused on participants of European descent, this study focused on Japanese participants.

Methods: The study participants were 16 patients who underwent rTMS and had the stimulus location identified using the 5-cm method. The lDLPFC was identified by the F3 electrode position and neuronavigation in addition to the 5-cm rule, and these locations were compared. We then performed a correlation analysis of the distance between the sites identified by the 5-cm method and by neuronavigation, as well as changes in scores on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17).

Results: The lDLPFC identified by the F3 site and neuronavigation was approximately 3 cm more anterolateral than that identified by the 5-cm method. A significant correlation was found between the distance between the sites identified by the 5-cm method and neuronavigation and the rate of change in HAMD-17 scores.

Conclusion: The ideal stimulation site may be approximately 3 cm anterior to the site identified by the 5-cm method, and stimulation of the F3 site may be a valid alternative to the 5-cm method.

治疗日本抑郁症的经颅磁刺激靶向法:标准、F3 和神经导航法的比较。
简介左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(lDLPFC)是重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗抑郁症的常见目标脑区。人们使用 "5 厘米规则 "来识别 lDLPFC。然而,lDLPFC 的识别可能偏离神经导航定位的理想刺激部位。因此,我们旨在将这种方法与其他方法进行比较,并研究与理想刺激部位的偏差与治疗效果之间的关系。现有的研究大多以欧洲后裔为研究对象,而本研究则以日本后裔为研究对象:研究对象为 16 名接受经颅磁刺激的患者,他们使用 5 厘米法确定了刺激位置。除了 5 厘米规则外,我们还通过 F3 电极位置和神经导航确定了 lDLPFC,并对这些位置进行了比较。然后,我们对用5厘米法和神经导航确定的位置之间的距离以及17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)的评分变化进行了相关分析:结果:通过F3部位和神经导航确定的lDLPFC比通过5厘米方法确定的lDLPFC前外侧高出约3厘米。5 厘米法和神经导航确定的部位之间的距离与 HAMD-17 评分的变化率之间存在明显的相关性:结论:理想的刺激部位可能在 5 厘米法所确定部位的前方约 3 厘米处,刺激 F3部位可能是 5 厘米法的有效替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信