Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Icelandic community sample.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1080/08039488.2024.2412777
Gudmundur Skarphedinsson, Urdur Njardvik
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Icelandic community sample.","authors":"Gudmundur Skarphedinsson, Urdur Njardvik","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2024.2412777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The current paper aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, for both parent and teacher reports. SDQ is a widely used questionnaire for screening mental problems among youth. However, only a few studies have conducted a factor analysis on the youngest and oldest cohorts using an adequate sample size. This study aims not only to examine the traditional 5-factor model and alternative models suggested in prior research but also to establish norm data for the Icelandic population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The total sample consists of 1653 youth aged 5-16 years, thereof 316 parent reports and 271 teacher reports for the 5-year-old sample. We used confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the factor structure. Special attention was given to the models' performance across different age groups and between genders. This cross-demographic evaluation is vital to ensure that the SDQ's utility is not limited by developmental or gender-specific variations in symptom expression or reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found an acceptable fit for both the original five-factor model and the more recent three-factor model with higher-order internalizing and externalizing factors. The fit for the factor structures seemed to be quite similar across ages. However, we observed goodness-of-fit below the acceptable range for girls on the parent ratings. We also found evidence for the convergent and divergent validity of both models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study provides further evidence of the utility of the SDQ as a screening instrument, with an acceptable factor structure across ages.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"705-712"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2024.2412777","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The current paper aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, for both parent and teacher reports. SDQ is a widely used questionnaire for screening mental problems among youth. However, only a few studies have conducted a factor analysis on the youngest and oldest cohorts using an adequate sample size. This study aims not only to examine the traditional 5-factor model and alternative models suggested in prior research but also to establish norm data for the Icelandic population.

Materials and methods: The total sample consists of 1653 youth aged 5-16 years, thereof 316 parent reports and 271 teacher reports for the 5-year-old sample. We used confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the factor structure. Special attention was given to the models' performance across different age groups and between genders. This cross-demographic evaluation is vital to ensure that the SDQ's utility is not limited by developmental or gender-specific variations in symptom expression or reporting.

Results: We found an acceptable fit for both the original five-factor model and the more recent three-factor model with higher-order internalizing and externalizing factors. The fit for the factor structures seemed to be quite similar across ages. However, we observed goodness-of-fit below the acceptable range for girls on the parent ratings. We also found evidence for the convergent and divergent validity of both models.

Conclusions: The current study provides further evidence of the utility of the SDQ as a screening instrument, with an acceptable factor structure across ages.

冰岛社区样本中优势与困难问卷的心理测量特性。
目的:本文旨在评估冰岛语版优势与困难问卷的心理测量特性,包括家长和教师报告。优势与困难问卷(SDQ)是一份广泛用于筛查青少年心理问题的问卷。然而,只有少数研究使用足够的样本量对年龄最小和年龄最大的组群进行了因子分析。本研究的目的不仅在于检验传统的 5 因子模型和先前研究中提出的替代模型,还在于建立冰岛人口的标准数据:总样本包括 1653 名 5-16 岁的青少年,其中 5 岁样本有 316 份家长报告和 271 份教师报告。我们使用确认性因子分析来评估因子结构。我们特别关注了模型在不同年龄组和不同性别之间的表现。这种跨人口学的评估对于确保 SDQ 的实用性不受症状表达或报告方面的发育或性别差异的限制至关重要:结果:我们发现原始的五因素模型和最新的三因素模型(包含高阶内化和外化因素)的拟合度都可以接受。各年龄段的因素结构拟合度似乎非常相似。然而,我们发现女孩在家长评分方面的拟合度低于可接受的范围。我们还发现了两个模型的收敛有效性和发散有效性的证据:目前的研究进一步证明了 SDQ 作为筛查工具的实用性,其各年龄段的因子结构均可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信