Enhancing Cough Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease Through Variable Practice During Skill Training.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
James C Borders, Katya Villarreal-Cavazos, Jessica E Huber, Lori Quinn, Bryan Keller, Michelle S Troche
{"title":"Enhancing Cough Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease Through Variable Practice During Skill Training.","authors":"James C Borders, Katya Villarreal-Cavazos, Jessica E Huber, Lori Quinn, Bryan Keller, Michelle S Troche","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When re-learning a motor skill, practicing a variety of treatment targets promotes error processing and the exploration of motor control strategies, which initially disrupts accuracy during training (motor performance), but ultimately enhances generalization, retention, and transfer (motor learning). Cough skill training (CST) is feasible and efficacious to improve cough strength; however, previous studies have used the same practice target during training.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our goal was to examine the impact of CST with variable practice on motor performance, motor learning, and respiratory system adaptations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was a prospective three-visit single group design. Twenty individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) and concomitant dysphagia and dystussia completed two sessions of CST involving three randomized practice targets. Cough, lung volume, and airway clearance outcomes were assessed before and after treatment sessions with long-term retention evaluated after 1 month.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peak expiratory flow rate improved after CST with variable practice for voluntary single (β = 0.35 L/s) and sequential (β = 0.22 L/s) cough, which were maintained after 1 month without treatment. The ability to expel material from the upper airway demonstrated a small magnitude of improvement (β = -1.87%). During CST, participants altered lung volume based on the treatment target and lung volume decreased during reflex cough after completing CST.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with PD demonstrated improvements in several aspects of motor learning after two sessions of CST with variable practice. Increasing lung volume may not be an implicit strategy to upregulate voluntary cough strength in this treatment paradigm. The findings support the need for larger investigations exploring the potential benefits of this CST approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When re-learning a motor skill, practicing a variety of treatment targets promotes error processing and the exploration of motor control strategies, which initially disrupts accuracy during training (motor performance), but ultimately enhances generalization, retention, and transfer (motor learning). Cough skill training (CST) is feasible and efficacious to improve cough strength; however, previous studies have used the same practice target during training.

Objectives: Our goal was to examine the impact of CST with variable practice on motor performance, motor learning, and respiratory system adaptations.

Method: The study was a prospective three-visit single group design. Twenty individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) and concomitant dysphagia and dystussia completed two sessions of CST involving three randomized practice targets. Cough, lung volume, and airway clearance outcomes were assessed before and after treatment sessions with long-term retention evaluated after 1 month.

Results: Peak expiratory flow rate improved after CST with variable practice for voluntary single (β = 0.35 L/s) and sequential (β = 0.22 L/s) cough, which were maintained after 1 month without treatment. The ability to expel material from the upper airway demonstrated a small magnitude of improvement (β = -1.87%). During CST, participants altered lung volume based on the treatment target and lung volume decreased during reflex cough after completing CST.

Conclusions: Individuals with PD demonstrated improvements in several aspects of motor learning after two sessions of CST with variable practice. Increasing lung volume may not be an implicit strategy to upregulate voluntary cough strength in this treatment paradigm. The findings support the need for larger investigations exploring the potential benefits of this CST approach.

通过技能训练过程中的不同练习来提高帕金森病患者的咳嗽运动学习能力
背景:在重新学习一项运动技能时,练习各种治疗目标可促进错误处理和对运动控制策略的探索,这最初会破坏训练过程中的准确性(运动表现),但最终会增强泛化、保持和迁移(运动学习)。咳嗽技能训练(CST)对提高咳嗽强度是可行且有效的;然而,以往的研究在训练过程中都使用相同的练习目标:我们的目标是研究不同练习方式的 CST 对运动表现、运动学习和呼吸系统适应性的影响:本研究采用前瞻性的三次访问单组设计。20名患有帕金森病(PD)并同时伴有吞咽困难和肌张力障碍的患者完成了两节CST课程,其中包括三个随机练习目标。治疗前后对咳嗽、肺活量和气道通畅情况进行了评估,1 个月后对长期保持情况进行了评估:结果:CST治疗后,单次自主咳嗽(β = 0.35 L/s)和连续咳嗽(β = 0.22 L/s)的峰值呼气流速均有不同程度的改善,在未接受治疗的情况下,1个月后仍能保持。从上气道排出物质的能力略有改善(β =-1.87%)。在CST过程中,参与者根据治疗目标改变肺容量,完成CST后反射性咳嗽时肺容量减少:结论:帕金森病患者在经过两节不同练习的 CST 之后,在运动学习的多个方面都有所改善。在这种治疗范式中,增加肺活量可能并不是提高自主咳嗽强度的隐性策略。研究结果表明,有必要进行更大规模的调查,探索这种CST方法的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信