Impact of sex on clinical outcomes according to immunologic risk in spousal donor kidney transplantation.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Seunghyeok Choi, Hanbi Lee, Sang Hun Eum, Ji-Won Min, Hye Eun Yoon, Chul Woo Yang, Byung Ha Chung
{"title":"Impact of sex on clinical outcomes according to immunologic risk in spousal donor kidney transplantation.","authors":"Seunghyeok Choi, Hanbi Lee, Sang Hun Eum, Ji-Won Min, Hye Eun Yoon, Chul Woo Yang, Byung Ha Chung","doi":"10.23876/j.krcp.24.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of sex on the clinical outcomes of spousal donor kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 456 spousal donor kidney transplantation recipients and categorized them into standard or high immunological risk groups according to panel-reactive antibody ≥50% or less. There were 366 recipients in the standard-risk group and 89 recipients in the high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing biopsy-proven allograft rejection within 1 year from kidney transplantation, husband-to-wife recipients showed significantly higher incidence than wife-to-husband recipients in the high-risk group. By contrast, there was no significant difference between wife-to-husband and husband-to-wife recipients in the standard-risk group. Allograft function recovery was better in husband-to-wife recipients than in wife-to-husband recipients in each group, while husband-to-wife recipients in the high-risk group showed a more rapid decline than other recipients. The long-term patient and allograft survival rates showed no difference between husband-to-wife recipients and wife-to-husband recipients within the same groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The husband-to-wife recipients with high immunological risk showed a higher risk of biopsy-proven allograft rejection compared to wife-to-husband recipients, so careful monitoring and management may be required.</p>","PeriodicalId":17716,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Research and Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.24.128","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of sex on the clinical outcomes of spousal donor kidney transplantation.

Methods: We analyzed 456 spousal donor kidney transplantation recipients and categorized them into standard or high immunological risk groups according to panel-reactive antibody ≥50% or less. There were 366 recipients in the standard-risk group and 89 recipients in the high-risk group.

Results: When comparing biopsy-proven allograft rejection within 1 year from kidney transplantation, husband-to-wife recipients showed significantly higher incidence than wife-to-husband recipients in the high-risk group. By contrast, there was no significant difference between wife-to-husband and husband-to-wife recipients in the standard-risk group. Allograft function recovery was better in husband-to-wife recipients than in wife-to-husband recipients in each group, while husband-to-wife recipients in the high-risk group showed a more rapid decline than other recipients. The long-term patient and allograft survival rates showed no difference between husband-to-wife recipients and wife-to-husband recipients within the same groups.

Conclusion: The husband-to-wife recipients with high immunological risk showed a higher risk of biopsy-proven allograft rejection compared to wife-to-husband recipients, so careful monitoring and management may be required.

在配偶捐肾移植手术中,根据免疫学风险判断性别对临床结果的影响。
背景:本研究旨在探讨性别对配偶捐肾移植临床结果的影响:本研究旨在探讨性别对配偶供肾移植临床结果的影响:我们分析了456名配偶供肾移植受者,并根据小组反应性抗体≥50%或更低将其分为标准免疫风险组和高免疫风险组。标准风险组有 366 名受者,高风险组有 89 名受者:结果:比较肾移植后1年内活检证实的异体移植排斥反应,在高风险组中,丈夫对妻子受者的排斥反应发生率明显高于妻子对丈夫受者。相比之下,在标准风险组中,妻子对丈夫和丈夫对妻子的受者之间没有明显差异。各组中,丈夫对妻子受者的异体移植物功能恢复情况均优于妻子对丈夫受者,而高风险组中丈夫对妻子受者的功能下降速度比其他受者更快。在同一组中,丈夫对妻子受者与妻子对丈夫受者的长期患者存活率和异体移植存活率没有差异:结论:与妻子对丈夫的受者相比,具有高免疫风险的丈夫对妻子的受者出现活检证实的异体移植排斥反应的风险更高,因此可能需要进行仔细的监测和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Kidney Research and Clinical Practice (formerly The Korean Journal of Nephrology; ISSN 1975-9460, launched in 1982), the official journal of the Korean Society of Nephrology, is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English. Its ISO abbreviation is Kidney Res Clin Pract. To provide an efficient venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to basic renal science and clinical practice, the journal offers open access (free submission and free access) and considers articles on all aspects of clinical nephrology and hypertension as well as related molecular genetics, anatomy, pathology, physiology, pharmacology, and immunology. In particular, the journal focuses on translational renal research that helps bridging laboratory discovery with the diagnosis and treatment of human kidney disease. Topics covered include basic science with possible clinical applicability and papers on the pathophysiological basis of disease processes of the kidney. Original researches from areas of intervention nephrology or dialysis access are also welcomed. Major article types considered for publication include original research and reviews on current topics of interest. Accepted manuscripts are granted free online open-access immediately after publication, which permits its users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles to facilitate access to a broad readership. Circulation number of print copies is 1,600.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信