Influences of Variability in Attenuation Compensation on the Estimation of Backscatter Coefficient of Median Nerves in Vivo

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Yuanshan Wu BS, Victor Barrere PhD, Aiguo Han PhD, Eric Y. Chang MD, Michael Andre PhD, Sameer B. Shah PhD
{"title":"Influences of Variability in Attenuation Compensation on the Estimation of Backscatter Coefficient of Median Nerves in Vivo","authors":"Yuanshan Wu BS,&nbsp;Victor Barrere PhD,&nbsp;Aiguo Han PhD,&nbsp;Eric Y. Chang MD,&nbsp;Michael Andre PhD,&nbsp;Sameer B. Shah PhD","doi":"10.1002/jum.16585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Peripheral nerves remain a challenging target for medical imaging, given their size, anatomical complexity, and structural heterogeneity. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) applies a set of techniques to estimate tissue acoustic parameters independent of the imaging platform. Many useful medical and laboratory applications for QUS have been reported, but challenges remain for deployment in vivo, especially for heterogeneous tissues. Several phenomena introduce variability in attenuation estimates, which may influence the estimation of other QUS parameters. For example, estimating the backscatter coefficient (BSC) requires compensation for the attenuation of overlying tissues between the transducer and the underlying tissue of interest. The purpose of this study is to extend prior studies by investigating the efficacy of several analytical methods of estimating attenuation compensation on QUS outcomes in the human median nerve.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Median nerves were imaged at the volar wrist in vivo and beam-formed radiofrequency (RF) data were acquired. Six analytical approaches for attenuation compensation were compared: 1–2) attenuation estimated by applying spectral difference method (SDM) and spectral log difference method (SLDM) independently to regions of interest (ROIs) overlying the nerve and to the nerve ROI itself; 3–4) attenuation estimation by applying SDM and SLDM to ROIs overlying the nerve, and transferring these properties to the nerve ROI; and 5–6) methods that apply previously published values of tissue attenuation to the measured thickness of each overlying tissue. Mean between-subject estimates of BSC-related outcomes as well as within-subject variability of these outcomes were compared among the 6 methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compensating for attenuation using SLDM and values from the literature reduced variability in BSC-based outcomes, compared to SDM. Variability in attenuation coefficients contributes substantially to variability in backscatter measurements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This work has implications for the application of QUS to in vivo diagnostic assessments in peripheral nerves and possibly other heterogeneous tissues.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":"97-109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632647/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jum.16585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Peripheral nerves remain a challenging target for medical imaging, given their size, anatomical complexity, and structural heterogeneity. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) applies a set of techniques to estimate tissue acoustic parameters independent of the imaging platform. Many useful medical and laboratory applications for QUS have been reported, but challenges remain for deployment in vivo, especially for heterogeneous tissues. Several phenomena introduce variability in attenuation estimates, which may influence the estimation of other QUS parameters. For example, estimating the backscatter coefficient (BSC) requires compensation for the attenuation of overlying tissues between the transducer and the underlying tissue of interest. The purpose of this study is to extend prior studies by investigating the efficacy of several analytical methods of estimating attenuation compensation on QUS outcomes in the human median nerve.

Methods

Median nerves were imaged at the volar wrist in vivo and beam-formed radiofrequency (RF) data were acquired. Six analytical approaches for attenuation compensation were compared: 1–2) attenuation estimated by applying spectral difference method (SDM) and spectral log difference method (SLDM) independently to regions of interest (ROIs) overlying the nerve and to the nerve ROI itself; 3–4) attenuation estimation by applying SDM and SLDM to ROIs overlying the nerve, and transferring these properties to the nerve ROI; and 5–6) methods that apply previously published values of tissue attenuation to the measured thickness of each overlying tissue. Mean between-subject estimates of BSC-related outcomes as well as within-subject variability of these outcomes were compared among the 6 methods.

Results

Compensating for attenuation using SLDM and values from the literature reduced variability in BSC-based outcomes, compared to SDM. Variability in attenuation coefficients contributes substantially to variability in backscatter measurements.

Conclusion

This work has implications for the application of QUS to in vivo diagnostic assessments in peripheral nerves and possibly other heterogeneous tissues.

Abstract Image

衰减补偿的变异性对估算活体正中神经后向散射系数的影响
目的:鉴于周围神经的大小、解剖结构的复杂性和结构的异质性,周围神经仍然是医学成像的挑战性目标。定量超声(QUS)应用一系列技术估算组织声学参数,与成像平台无关。据报道,QUS 在医学和实验室方面有许多有用的应用,但在体内应用,尤其是异质组织的应用方面仍面临挑战。有几种现象会引起衰减估计值的变化,从而影响其他 QUS 参数的估计。例如,估算后向散射系数(BSC)需要补偿换能器和相关下层组织之间上覆组织的衰减。本研究的目的是通过调查几种估算衰减补偿的分析方法对人体正中神经 QUS 结果的影响来扩展之前的研究:方法:对腕部正中神经进行活体成像,并获取射频(RF)波束成形数据。比较了六种衰减补偿分析方法:1-2)将光谱差分法(SDM)和光谱对数差分法(SLDM)独立应用于神经覆盖的感兴趣区(ROI)和神经ROI本身,从而估算衰减;3-4)将SDM和SLDM应用于神经覆盖的ROI,然后将这些属性转移到神经ROI,从而估算衰减;以及5-6)将之前公布的组织衰减值应用于每个覆盖组织的测量厚度的方法。对 6 种方法的 BSC 相关结果的受试者间平均估计值以及这些结果的受试者内变异性进行了比较:结果:与 SDM 相比,使用 SLDM 和文献值对衰减进行补偿降低了基于 BSC 的结果的变异性。衰减系数的变化在很大程度上导致了反向散射测量结果的变化:这项工作对将 QUS 应用于周围神经和其他异质组织的活体诊断评估具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
205
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community. Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to: -Basic Science- Breast Ultrasound- Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound- Dermatology- Echocardiography- Elastography- Emergency Medicine- Fetal Echocardiography- Gastrointestinal Ultrasound- General and Abdominal Ultrasound- Genitourinary Ultrasound- Gynecologic Ultrasound- Head and Neck Ultrasound- High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging- Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound- Neurosonology- Obstetric Ultrasound- Ophthalmologic Ultrasound- Pediatric Ultrasound- Point-of-Care Ultrasound- Public Policy- Superficial Structures- Therapeutic Ultrasound- Ultrasound Education- Ultrasound in Global Health- Urologic Ultrasound- Vascular Ultrasound
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信