Clinical validation of a deep learning-based approach for preoperative decision-making in implant size for total knee arthroplasty.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ki-Bong Park, Moo-Sub Kim, Do-Kun Yoon, Young Dae Jeon
{"title":"Clinical validation of a deep learning-based approach for preoperative decision-making in implant size for total knee arthroplasty.","authors":"Ki-Bong Park, Moo-Sub Kim, Do-Kun Yoon, Young Dae Jeon","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05128-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopedic surgeons use manual measurements, acetate templating, and dedicated software to determine the appropriate implant size for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to use deep learning (DL) to assist in deciding the femoral and tibial implant sizes without manual manipulation and to evaluate the clinical validity of the DL decision by comparing it with conventional manual procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two types of DL were used to detect the femoral and tibial regions using the You Only Look Once algorithm model and to determine the implant size from the detected regions using convolutional neural network. An experienced surgeon predicted the implant size for 234 patient cases using manual procedures, and the DL model also predicted the implant sizes for the same cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exact accuracies of the surgeon's template were 61.54% and 68.38% for predicting femoral and tibial implant sizes, respectively. Meanwhile, the proposed DL model reported exact accuracies of 89.32% and 90.60% for femoral and tibial implant sizes, respectively. The accuracy ± 1 levels of the surgeon and proposed DL model were 97.44% and 97.86%, respectively, for the femoral implant size and 98.72% for both the surgeon and proposed DL model for the tibial implant size.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed differences and higher agreement levels achieved by the proposed DL model demonstrate its potential as a valuable tool in preoperative decision-making for TKA. By providing accurate predictions of implant size, the proposed DL model has the potential to optimize implant selection, leading to improved surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05128-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthopedic surgeons use manual measurements, acetate templating, and dedicated software to determine the appropriate implant size for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to use deep learning (DL) to assist in deciding the femoral and tibial implant sizes without manual manipulation and to evaluate the clinical validity of the DL decision by comparing it with conventional manual procedures.

Methods: Two types of DL were used to detect the femoral and tibial regions using the You Only Look Once algorithm model and to determine the implant size from the detected regions using convolutional neural network. An experienced surgeon predicted the implant size for 234 patient cases using manual procedures, and the DL model also predicted the implant sizes for the same cases.

Results: The exact accuracies of the surgeon's template were 61.54% and 68.38% for predicting femoral and tibial implant sizes, respectively. Meanwhile, the proposed DL model reported exact accuracies of 89.32% and 90.60% for femoral and tibial implant sizes, respectively. The accuracy ± 1 levels of the surgeon and proposed DL model were 97.44% and 97.86%, respectively, for the femoral implant size and 98.72% for both the surgeon and proposed DL model for the tibial implant size.

Conclusion: The observed differences and higher agreement levels achieved by the proposed DL model demonstrate its potential as a valuable tool in preoperative decision-making for TKA. By providing accurate predictions of implant size, the proposed DL model has the potential to optimize implant selection, leading to improved surgical outcomes.

基于深度学习的全膝关节置换术术前植入物大小决策方法的临床验证。
背景:骨科医生使用人工测量、醋酸纤维模板和专用软件来确定全膝关节置换术(TKA)的合适植入物尺寸。本研究旨在使用深度学习(DL)协助确定股骨和胫骨植入物的尺寸,而无需人工操作,并通过与传统人工程序进行比较,评估DL决策的临床有效性:使用两种类型的 DL,利用 "You Only Look Once "算法模型检测股骨和胫骨区域,并利用卷积神经网络根据检测到的区域确定植入物尺寸。一位经验丰富的外科医生使用手动程序预测了 234 例患者的植入物大小,DL 模型也预测了相同病例的植入物大小:结果:外科医生模板预测股骨和胫骨植入物尺寸的准确率分别为 61.54% 和 68.38%。同时,所提出的 DL 模型在预测股骨和胫骨假体尺寸方面的准确率分别为 89.32% 和 90.60%。对于股骨植入物尺寸,外科医生和拟议的 DL 模型的准确度±1 级分别为 97.44% 和 97.86%,对于胫骨植入物尺寸,外科医生和拟议的 DL 模型的准确度±1 级均为 98.72%:拟议的 DL 模型所观察到的差异和更高的一致性水平表明,它有潜力成为 TKA 术前决策的重要工具。通过对植入物大小的准确预测,拟议的 DL 模型有可能优化植入物的选择,从而改善手术效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信