Katarzyna Machnik, Jakub Smoliński, Mariola Paściak
{"title":"Evaluation of protein extraction protocols for MALDI-TOF Biotyper analysis of mycobacteria","authors":"Katarzyna Machnik, Jakub Smoliński, Mariola Paściak","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2024.107052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Infections caused by <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em> and nontuberculous mycobacteria represent a significant global threat and medical concern. Therefore, accurate and reliable methods must be employed to identify mycobacteria rapidly. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a technique that compares the cellular protein profiles of unknown isolates with reference mass spectra in a database to identify microorganisms. However, the thick and waxy lipid layer, which is rich in mycolic acids and is present in mycobacterial cells, makes protein extraction challenging. To identify the optimal protocol for correctly identifying bacilli using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, this study compared four different cellular protein extraction methods. Four strains of <em>M. bovis</em> BCG were selected as representatives of slow-growing mycobacteria, while three strains of fast-growing mycobacteria were also included: <em>M. peregrinum</em>, <em>M. smegmatis,</em> and <em>M. farcinogenes</em>. The extraction method that proved most effective was the extraction of inactivated cells with chloroform and methanol, which partially delipidates the cells. These cells were then extracted with formic acid, as is standard practice for protein extraction. The advantage of this method is that it allows the parallel analysis of cellular lipids and proteins from a single sample. It is therefore important to optimize mycobacterial protein extraction for MALDI-TOF MS analysis in clinical microbiology laboratories.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 107052"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167701224001647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Infections caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and nontuberculous mycobacteria represent a significant global threat and medical concern. Therefore, accurate and reliable methods must be employed to identify mycobacteria rapidly. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a technique that compares the cellular protein profiles of unknown isolates with reference mass spectra in a database to identify microorganisms. However, the thick and waxy lipid layer, which is rich in mycolic acids and is present in mycobacterial cells, makes protein extraction challenging. To identify the optimal protocol for correctly identifying bacilli using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, this study compared four different cellular protein extraction methods. Four strains of M. bovis BCG were selected as representatives of slow-growing mycobacteria, while three strains of fast-growing mycobacteria were also included: M. peregrinum, M. smegmatis, and M. farcinogenes. The extraction method that proved most effective was the extraction of inactivated cells with chloroform and methanol, which partially delipidates the cells. These cells were then extracted with formic acid, as is standard practice for protein extraction. The advantage of this method is that it allows the parallel analysis of cellular lipids and proteins from a single sample. It is therefore important to optimize mycobacterial protein extraction for MALDI-TOF MS analysis in clinical microbiology laboratories.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach.
All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.