Health-related quality of life among women and men living with migraine: a Canada-wide cross-sectional study.

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alexander C T Tam, Hiten Naik, Logan Trenaman, Larry Lynd, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Health-related quality of life among women and men living with migraine: a Canada-wide cross-sectional study.","authors":"Alexander C T Tam, Hiten Naik, Logan Trenaman, Larry Lynd, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01882-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine is a prevalent neurologic disorder that affects women more than men. Examining health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by gender can aid decision makers in prioritizing future treatment and prevention programs. We aimed to quantify HRQoL by different levels of migraine disability and by gender.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a Canada-wide cross-sectional study, we administered an online survey to employed adults who self-reported a diagnosis of migraine. Migraine disability level was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire (MIDAS). MIDAS scores were used to categorize respondents as having little to no, mild, moderate, or severe level of migraine-related disability. Physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) and health utilities were derived from responses to the Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey. PCS, MCS, and health utilities were summarized by migraine-related disability levels and gender. Covariate-adjusted linear regressions were used to examine the association between migraine disability level and health utility by gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 441 participants completed the survey. The sample was predominantly women (60.1%), White race (75.5%), and had a mean age of 37 years. Mean health utility, PCS, and MCS scores were 0.61 (0.22), 45.0 (7.7), and 43.4 (11.0), respectively. All three scores decreased with increased migraine disability level. Gender differences on HRQoL within each migraine disability level were not statistically significant, except in the little to no disability level where women had lower mean MCS scores and health utility relative to men [mean (SD) MCS: women 44.0 (11.3); men 55.1 (8.1), p < 0.001; health utility: women 0.66 (0.18); men 0.81 (0.18), p < 0.001]. Linear regressions showed women with severe migraine-related disability had reduced health utility compared to women with little to no disability [adjusted difference: -0.16 (95%CI -0.24,-0.09)]. Associations among men increased in magnitude with migraine disability level [adjusted differences: mild - 0.16 (95%CI -0.24,-0.09); moderate - 0.18 (95%CI -0.26,-0.10); severe - 0.28 (95%CI -0.37,-0.20)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings contribute to the literature on the association between migraine disability level and HRQoL by examining trends by gender. Model results emphasize the importance of future treatments reducing severe disability due to migraine among both women and men.</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01882-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Migraine is a prevalent neurologic disorder that affects women more than men. Examining health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by gender can aid decision makers in prioritizing future treatment and prevention programs. We aimed to quantify HRQoL by different levels of migraine disability and by gender.

Methods: As part of a Canada-wide cross-sectional study, we administered an online survey to employed adults who self-reported a diagnosis of migraine. Migraine disability level was assessed using the Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire (MIDAS). MIDAS scores were used to categorize respondents as having little to no, mild, moderate, or severe level of migraine-related disability. Physical and mental component summary scores (PCS and MCS) and health utilities were derived from responses to the Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey. PCS, MCS, and health utilities were summarized by migraine-related disability levels and gender. Covariate-adjusted linear regressions were used to examine the association between migraine disability level and health utility by gender.

Results: A total of 441 participants completed the survey. The sample was predominantly women (60.1%), White race (75.5%), and had a mean age of 37 years. Mean health utility, PCS, and MCS scores were 0.61 (0.22), 45.0 (7.7), and 43.4 (11.0), respectively. All three scores decreased with increased migraine disability level. Gender differences on HRQoL within each migraine disability level were not statistically significant, except in the little to no disability level where women had lower mean MCS scores and health utility relative to men [mean (SD) MCS: women 44.0 (11.3); men 55.1 (8.1), p < 0.001; health utility: women 0.66 (0.18); men 0.81 (0.18), p < 0.001]. Linear regressions showed women with severe migraine-related disability had reduced health utility compared to women with little to no disability [adjusted difference: -0.16 (95%CI -0.24,-0.09)]. Associations among men increased in magnitude with migraine disability level [adjusted differences: mild - 0.16 (95%CI -0.24,-0.09); moderate - 0.18 (95%CI -0.26,-0.10); severe - 0.28 (95%CI -0.37,-0.20)].

Conclusions: Findings contribute to the literature on the association between migraine disability level and HRQoL by examining trends by gender. Model results emphasize the importance of future treatments reducing severe disability due to migraine among both women and men.

患有偏头痛的女性和男性的健康相关生活质量:一项全加拿大横断面研究。
背景:偏头痛是一种常见的神经系统疾病,对女性的影响大于男性。按性别研究与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)有助于决策者确定未来治疗和预防计划的优先次序。我们的目标是按偏头痛残疾的不同程度和性别对与健康相关的生活质量进行量化:作为加拿大范围内横断面研究的一部分,我们对自我报告确诊患有偏头痛的在职成年人进行了在线调查。偏头痛残疾程度使用偏头痛残疾评估问卷(MIDAS)进行评估。MIDAS 分数被用来将受访者的偏头痛相关残疾程度分为几乎没有、轻度、中度和重度。身体和精神部分的总分(PCS和MCS)以及健康效用值来自对退伍军人兰德12项健康调查(Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey)的回答。PCS、MCS和健康效用按偏头痛相关残疾程度和性别进行汇总。使用协变量调整线性回归来研究不同性别偏头痛残疾程度与健康效用之间的关系:共有 441 名参与者完成了调查。样本主要为女性(60.1%)、白种人(75.5%),平均年龄为 37 岁。健康效用、PCS 和 MCS 的平均得分分别为 0.61 (0.22)、45.0 (7.7) 和 43.4 (11.0)。所有三项得分均随着偏头痛残疾程度的增加而降低。在每个偏头痛残疾等级中,HRQoL的性别差异在统计学上并不显著,但在轻度至无残疾等级中,女性的MCS平均得分和健康效用均低于男性[MCS平均值(标清):女性44.0 (11.3);男性55.1 (8.1),P 结论:研究结果通过研究不同性别的趋势,为偏头痛残疾程度与 HRQoL 之间关系的文献做出了贡献。模型结果强调了未来治疗减少女性和男性偏头痛严重残疾的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信