Simple-Challenging-Difficult (SCD) Difficulty Classification for Vertical Bone Augmentation.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cheng-Hsiang Hsu, Zhaozhao Chen, Istvan A Urban, Hom-Lay Wang
{"title":"Simple-Challenging-Difficult (SCD) Difficulty Classification for Vertical Bone Augmentation.","authors":"Cheng-Hsiang Hsu, Zhaozhao Chen, Istvan A Urban, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To propose a new difficulty classification for vertical bone augmentation (VBA) based on different defect morphologies.</p><p><strong>Overview: </strong>VBA procedures for dental implant placement present significant biological and technical challenges. Among the various techniques, guided bone regeneration (GBR) provides an optimal balance between the anticipated bone gain and the likelihood of postoperative complications. Understanding the specific configuration of defects and adjacent bone peaks is essential for tailoring treatment strategies and improving outcomes. The proposed Simple-Challenging-Difficult (SCD) difficulty classification was based on defect morphology (V-shaped, U-shaped, VV-shaped), including defect size (Height: < 5 mm, 5-8 mm, and > 8 mm), proximity of neighboring bony walls (Width: < 10 mm, 10-20 mm, and > 20 mm), as well as predictability of treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed difficulty classification for VBA serves as a guide for selecting the most appropriate GBR treatment modality and sequence for safe and predictable management of VBA in implant therapy. In addition, when determining the preferred treatment, it is again essential to consider site-specific and patient-related factors alongside the clinician's surgical experience and skill.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Identifying defect patterns and bone peak structures is crucial, and the proposed classification assists in decision-making in VBA treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To propose a new difficulty classification for vertical bone augmentation (VBA) based on different defect morphologies.

Overview: VBA procedures for dental implant placement present significant biological and technical challenges. Among the various techniques, guided bone regeneration (GBR) provides an optimal balance between the anticipated bone gain and the likelihood of postoperative complications. Understanding the specific configuration of defects and adjacent bone peaks is essential for tailoring treatment strategies and improving outcomes. The proposed Simple-Challenging-Difficult (SCD) difficulty classification was based on defect morphology (V-shaped, U-shaped, VV-shaped), including defect size (Height: < 5 mm, 5-8 mm, and > 8 mm), proximity of neighboring bony walls (Width: < 10 mm, 10-20 mm, and > 20 mm), as well as predictability of treatment outcomes.

Conclusions: The proposed difficulty classification for VBA serves as a guide for selecting the most appropriate GBR treatment modality and sequence for safe and predictable management of VBA in implant therapy. In addition, when determining the preferred treatment, it is again essential to consider site-specific and patient-related factors alongside the clinician's surgical experience and skill.

Clinical significance: Identifying defect patterns and bone peak structures is crucial, and the proposed classification assists in decision-making in VBA treatment.

垂直骨增量术的简单-挑战-困难 (SCD) 难度分类。
摘要根据不同的缺损形态,提出垂直骨增量术(VBA)的新难度分类:牙科种植体植入的垂直骨增量手术在生物学和技术上都面临着巨大的挑战。在各种技术中,引导骨再生(GBR)在预期骨增量和术后并发症可能性之间实现了最佳平衡。了解缺损和邻近骨峰的具体构造对于定制治疗策略和改善疗效至关重要。所提出的简单-挑战-困难(SCD)难度分类是基于缺损形态(V形、U形、VV形),包括缺损大小(高度:8毫米)、邻近骨壁的距离(宽度:20毫米)以及治疗结果的可预测性:结论:所提出的 VBA 难度分类可作为选择最合适的 GBR 治疗方式和顺序的指南,从而在种植治疗中安全、可预测地处理 VBA。此外,在确定首选治疗方法时,除了考虑临床医生的手术经验和技能外,还必须考虑特定部位和患者相关因素:临床意义:识别缺损模式和骨峰结构至关重要,所建议的分类有助于在 VBA 治疗中做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信