Finger-Controlled Nonultrasonic Lens Extractor.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Luiz A F Beniz, Marina S Chatzea, Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati, Alessandro A Jammal, Sonia H Yoo
{"title":"Finger-Controlled Nonultrasonic Lens Extractor.","authors":"Luiz A F Beniz, Marina S Chatzea, Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati, Alessandro A Jammal, Sonia H Yoo","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report initial surgical experience and learning curve with a novel finger-controlled, ultrasoundless lens extractor device and provide insights for future surgical endeavors.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (Miami, FL).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center, non-comparative, retrospective, consecutive case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>61 eyes of 51 individuals with cataract. All surgeries were performed with the miCOR® 700 lens extractor (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA) by a single experienced physician. Nuclear density was graded preoperatively. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and pachymetry were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Surgical videos were reviewed to collect data on time for each surgical step and complications. Regression analyses assessed the learning curve, performance improvement and effects of nuclear density on surgical time and postoperative pachymetric variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects had a mean age of 72.2 ± 7.6 years. Increased surgical experience significantly reduced procedure time (P < 0.001), nuclear removal time (P = 0.018) and cortex removal time (P = 0.002). Higher nuclear density resulted in longer procedure (P < 0.001) and nuclear removal time (P < 0.001). One posterior capsular rent occurred, not attributed to the lens extractor. No thermal damage to the corneal wound was observed. Postoperative CDVA improved significantly (P < 0.001 for eyes without ocular comorbidities, P = 0.016 for eyes with ocular comorbidities). All cases of corneal edema and IOP spikes resolved within a month.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The miCOR® 700 lens extractor offers an innovative, cost-effective approach to cataract surgery. Further research is needed to compare it with conventional phacoemulsification techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001561","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To report initial surgical experience and learning curve with a novel finger-controlled, ultrasoundless lens extractor device and provide insights for future surgical endeavors.

Setting: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (Miami, FL).

Design: Single-center, non-comparative, retrospective, consecutive case series.

Methods: 61 eyes of 51 individuals with cataract. All surgeries were performed with the miCOR® 700 lens extractor (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA) by a single experienced physician. Nuclear density was graded preoperatively. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and pachymetry were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Surgical videos were reviewed to collect data on time for each surgical step and complications. Regression analyses assessed the learning curve, performance improvement and effects of nuclear density on surgical time and postoperative pachymetric variation.

Results: Subjects had a mean age of 72.2 ± 7.6 years. Increased surgical experience significantly reduced procedure time (P < 0.001), nuclear removal time (P = 0.018) and cortex removal time (P = 0.002). Higher nuclear density resulted in longer procedure (P < 0.001) and nuclear removal time (P < 0.001). One posterior capsular rent occurred, not attributed to the lens extractor. No thermal damage to the corneal wound was observed. Postoperative CDVA improved significantly (P < 0.001 for eyes without ocular comorbidities, P = 0.016 for eyes with ocular comorbidities). All cases of corneal edema and IOP spikes resolved within a month.

Conclusions: The miCOR® 700 lens extractor offers an innovative, cost-effective approach to cataract surgery. Further research is needed to compare it with conventional phacoemulsification techniques.

手指控制非超声波透镜提取器
目的:报告使用新型指控无超声波晶状体摘除器的初步手术经验和学习曲线,并为未来的手术努力提供启示:巴斯克帕尔默眼科研究所(佛罗里达州迈阿密):方法:51 名白内障患者的 61 只眼睛。所有手术均由一名经验丰富的医生使用 miCOR® 700 晶状体摘除仪(卡尔蔡司医疗公司,加利福尼亚州都柏林)进行。术前对核密度进行了分级。术前和术后对矫正远视力 (CDVA)、眼压 (IOP) 和角膜厚度进行了评估。对手术录像进行了回顾,以收集每个手术步骤的时间和并发症的数据。回归分析评估了学习曲线、性能改进以及核密度对手术时间和术后眼底测量变化的影响:受试者的平均年龄为 72.2 ± 7.6 岁。手术经验的增加大大缩短了手术时间(P < 0.001)、核摘除时间(P = 0.018)和皮质摘除时间(P = 0.002)。核密度越高,手术时间(P < 0.001)和核摘除时间(P < 0.001)越长。发生了一次后囊脱落,与晶状体摘除器无关。角膜伤口未发现热损伤。术后 CDVA 明显改善(无眼部并发症者 P < 0.001,有眼部并发症者 P = 0.016)。所有角膜水肿和眼压升高病例均在一个月内缓解:miCOR® 700 晶状体摘除术为白内障手术提供了一种创新、经济的方法。结论:miCOR® 700 晶状体摘除术提供了一种创新的、具有成本效益的白内障手术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信