Endophthalmitis Rates following Secondary Intraocular Lens Surgeries: An 11-year Medicare Fee-For-Service Analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Caroline H Kerrison, David F Chang, Chen Dun, Jasdeep Sabharwal, Fasika A Woreta
{"title":"Endophthalmitis Rates following Secondary Intraocular Lens Surgeries: An 11-year Medicare Fee-For-Service Analysis.","authors":"Caroline H Kerrison, David F Chang, Chen Dun, Jasdeep Sabharwal, Fasika A Woreta","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) rates and risk factors after secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for preoperative aphakia and IOL exchange combined with or without vitrectomy.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Medicare fee for service (FFS) beneficiaries, United States.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medicare FFS beneficiaries who underwent IOL exchange or secondary IOL implantation for preoperative aphakia between January 1, 2011 - November 19, 2022 were identified. POE rates were calculated overall and separately for each surgical category - secondary IOL for aphakia versus IOL exchange, with subsets for concurrent anterior or posterior vitrectomy. Multi-variate analysis of potential risk factors was implemented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>97,152 patients were included. The 42-day POE rates for secondary IOL implantation for aphakia and for IOL exchange were 0.35% and 0.28% overall, 0.31% and 0.30% when combined with posterior vitrectomy, and 0.84% and 0.42% with anterior vitrectomy. The risk of POE increased when secondary IOL surgery was combined with anterior vitrectomy compared to no vitrectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.849; p<0.001) and with higher Charlson comorbidity indexes compared to 0: 1-2 (aOR 1.495; p=0.01), 3-4 (aOR 1.591; p=0.01), 5-6 (aOR 1.617; p=0.046), ≥7 (aOR 3.290; p<0.001). Risk was decreased for IOL exchange compared to secondary IOL implantation for preoperative aphakia (aOR 0.783; p=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall POE rate for all secondary IOL surgeries was 0.31% during the 11-year period. We hypothesize that absence of the posterior capsular barrier would explain the higher POE rates compared with cataract surgery, especially if a concurrent vitrectomy was performed with the secondary IOL procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001563","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) rates and risk factors after secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for preoperative aphakia and IOL exchange combined with or without vitrectomy.

Setting: Medicare fee for service (FFS) beneficiaries, United States.

Design: Retrospective study.

Methods: Medicare FFS beneficiaries who underwent IOL exchange or secondary IOL implantation for preoperative aphakia between January 1, 2011 - November 19, 2022 were identified. POE rates were calculated overall and separately for each surgical category - secondary IOL for aphakia versus IOL exchange, with subsets for concurrent anterior or posterior vitrectomy. Multi-variate analysis of potential risk factors was implemented.

Results: 97,152 patients were included. The 42-day POE rates for secondary IOL implantation for aphakia and for IOL exchange were 0.35% and 0.28% overall, 0.31% and 0.30% when combined with posterior vitrectomy, and 0.84% and 0.42% with anterior vitrectomy. The risk of POE increased when secondary IOL surgery was combined with anterior vitrectomy compared to no vitrectomy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.849; p<0.001) and with higher Charlson comorbidity indexes compared to 0: 1-2 (aOR 1.495; p=0.01), 3-4 (aOR 1.591; p=0.01), 5-6 (aOR 1.617; p=0.046), ≥7 (aOR 3.290; p<0.001). Risk was decreased for IOL exchange compared to secondary IOL implantation for preoperative aphakia (aOR 0.783; p=0.04).

Conclusion: The overall POE rate for all secondary IOL surgeries was 0.31% during the 11-year period. We hypothesize that absence of the posterior capsular barrier would explain the higher POE rates compared with cataract surgery, especially if a concurrent vitrectomy was performed with the secondary IOL procedure.

二次眼内透镜手术后的眼内炎发生率:一项为期 11 年的医疗保险收费服务分析。
目的:评估因术前无晶体眼而进行二次眼内人工晶体(IOL)植入术后眼内炎(POE)的发病率和风险因素,以及 IOL 置换联合或不联合玻璃体切除术的发病率和风险因素:背景:美国医疗保险付费服务(FFS)受益人:设计:回顾性研究:对 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 11 月 19 日期间因术前无晶体眼而接受人工晶体置换术或二次人工晶体植入术的联邦医疗保险 FFS 受益人进行鉴定。计算了总体 POE 率,并分别计算了每个手术类别的 POE 率--治疗无晶体眼的二次人工晶体植入术与人工晶体置换术,以及同时进行前部或后部玻璃体切除术的子集。对潜在风险因素进行了多变量分析:结果:共纳入 97 152 名患者。无晶体眼二次人工晶体植入术和人工晶体置换术的42天POE率分别为0.35%和0.28%,与后部玻璃体切除术合并时分别为0.31%和0.30%,与前部玻璃体切除术合并时分别为0.84%和0.42%。与不进行玻璃体切除术相比,当二次人工晶体手术与前部玻璃体切除术合并进行时,发生 POE 的风险会增加(调整后的几率比 [aOR] 1.849;p 结论:所有二次人工晶体手术的总 POE 率为 0.28%:在这 11 年间,所有二次 IOL 手术的 POE 总发生率为 0.31%。我们假设,与白内障手术相比,后囊屏障的缺失是POE率较高的原因,尤其是在二次人工晶体手术同时进行了玻璃体切除术的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信