Short communication: A multispecies bacterial-based direct-fed microbial alleviates Salmonella invasion and supports in vitro epithelial integrity.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Raphaele Gresse, Bruno I Cappellozza, Lena C Capern, Tine T M Knudsen, Giuseppe Copani
{"title":"Short communication: A multispecies bacterial-based direct-fed microbial alleviates Salmonella invasion and supports in vitro epithelial integrity.","authors":"Raphaele Gresse, Bruno I Cappellozza, Lena C Capern, Tine T M Knudsen, Giuseppe Copani","doi":"10.1093/jas/skae304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Managing bacterial infections is of great importance in livestock production, particularly those caused by Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium or Dublin, which can impact both animal health and performance, as well as human food safety. Direct-fed microbials (DFM) can support gastrointestinal function and alleviate the potential negative effects of bacterial infections. In the present study, the capacity of a multispecies bacterial-based DFM containing Ligilactobacillus (formerly Lactobacillus) animalis 506, Propionibacterium freudenreichii 507, Bacillus licheniformis 809, and B. subtilis 597 to reduce S. Typhimurium ATCC14028 invasion was investigated using a co-incubation model with the HT29-MTX-E12 cell line (Exp. 1). Next, a possible antagonistic effect of the DFM against S. Dublin ATCC 41286 was evaluated using an in vitro agar well diffusion method following a co-incubation of 48 h (Exp. 2). At last, a series of experiments were performed to evaluate how different doses (6.25 × 106, 2.50 × 107, or 1.00 × 108 CFU/well) of the DFM would support the integrity of intestinal epithelial cells challenged or not with S. Typhimurium ATCC14028 or hydrogen peroxide under a transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) assay with Caco-2 cells (Exp. 3 and 4). In Exp. 1, BDP significantly (P < 0.001) reduced by 90.8% the invasion of S. Typhimurium into HT29-MTX-E12 cells, whereas viability of the potentially harmful bacteria was reduced by 21.0% (P < 0.0001). In Exp. 2, the antagonistic properties of BDP towards S. Dublin were confirmed by the detection of a clear inhibition zone (size = 8.6 mm). Lastly, without challenge, the lowest dose of the DFM (6.25 × 106 CFU) provided the greatest support on the cells (treatment × hour; P < 0.0001). However, when the cells were challenged with S. Typhimurium, all doses alleviated the loss of integrity caused by the pathogen (treatment × hour; P < 0.0001). In cells challenged with hydrogen peroxide, the greater dose (1.00 × 108 CFU) supported the cells for a longer period of time (treatment × hour; P < 0.0001). These in vitro findings set the stage for exploring the potential benefits of using a novel DFM as a promising tool and strategy to mitigate Salmonella enterica infections in ruminants and improve animal health, food safety, and public health. Further in vivo confirmation needs to be developed to validate these preliminary in vitro results.</p>","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing bacterial infections is of great importance in livestock production, particularly those caused by Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium or Dublin, which can impact both animal health and performance, as well as human food safety. Direct-fed microbials (DFM) can support gastrointestinal function and alleviate the potential negative effects of bacterial infections. In the present study, the capacity of a multispecies bacterial-based DFM containing Ligilactobacillus (formerly Lactobacillus) animalis 506, Propionibacterium freudenreichii 507, Bacillus licheniformis 809, and B. subtilis 597 to reduce S. Typhimurium ATCC14028 invasion was investigated using a co-incubation model with the HT29-MTX-E12 cell line (Exp. 1). Next, a possible antagonistic effect of the DFM against S. Dublin ATCC 41286 was evaluated using an in vitro agar well diffusion method following a co-incubation of 48 h (Exp. 2). At last, a series of experiments were performed to evaluate how different doses (6.25 × 106, 2.50 × 107, or 1.00 × 108 CFU/well) of the DFM would support the integrity of intestinal epithelial cells challenged or not with S. Typhimurium ATCC14028 or hydrogen peroxide under a transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) assay with Caco-2 cells (Exp. 3 and 4). In Exp. 1, BDP significantly (P < 0.001) reduced by 90.8% the invasion of S. Typhimurium into HT29-MTX-E12 cells, whereas viability of the potentially harmful bacteria was reduced by 21.0% (P < 0.0001). In Exp. 2, the antagonistic properties of BDP towards S. Dublin were confirmed by the detection of a clear inhibition zone (size = 8.6 mm). Lastly, without challenge, the lowest dose of the DFM (6.25 × 106 CFU) provided the greatest support on the cells (treatment × hour; P < 0.0001). However, when the cells were challenged with S. Typhimurium, all doses alleviated the loss of integrity caused by the pathogen (treatment × hour; P < 0.0001). In cells challenged with hydrogen peroxide, the greater dose (1.00 × 108 CFU) supported the cells for a longer period of time (treatment × hour; P < 0.0001). These in vitro findings set the stage for exploring the potential benefits of using a novel DFM as a promising tool and strategy to mitigate Salmonella enterica infections in ruminants and improve animal health, food safety, and public health. Further in vivo confirmation needs to be developed to validate these preliminary in vitro results.

简短通讯:基于多物种细菌的直接喂养微生物可减轻沙门氏菌的侵袭并支持体外上皮细胞的完整性。
控制细菌感染在畜牧业生产中非常重要,尤其是由伤寒沙门氏菌或都柏林沙门氏菌引起的细菌感染,这会影响动物的健康和生产性能,以及人类的食品安全。直接饲喂微生物(DFM)可以支持肠胃功能,减轻细菌感染的潜在负面影响。在本研究中,采用与 HT29-MTX-E12 细胞系共孵育模型(实验 1),研究了含有动物利吉乳酸杆菌(原乳酸杆菌)506、腐生丙酸杆菌 507、地衣芽孢杆菌 809 和枯草芽孢杆菌 597 的多菌种细菌基 DFM 减少伤寒杆菌 ATCC14028 侵袭的能力。接下来,在共培养 48 小时后,使用体外琼脂井扩散法评估了 DFM 对都柏林沙门氏菌 ATCC 41286 可能的拮抗作用(实验 2)。最后,还进行了一系列实验,以评估不同剂量(6.25 × 106、2.50 × 107 或 1.00 × 108 CFU/孔)的 DFM 如何在 Caco-2 细胞跨上皮电阻(TEER)试验中支持受到或未受到伤寒杆菌 ATCC14028 或过氧化氢挑战的肠上皮细胞的完整性(实验 3 和 4)。在实验 1 中,BDP 能显著(P < 0.001)减少伤寒杆菌侵入 HT29-MTX-E12 细胞 90.8%,而潜在有害细菌的存活率则降低了 21.0%(P < 0.0001)。在实验 2 中,通过检测明显的抑制区(大小 = 8.6 毫米),证实了 BDP 对都柏林痢疾杆菌的拮抗特性。最后,在没有挑战的情况下,最低剂量的 DFM(6.25 × 106 CFU)对细胞的支持最大(处理 × 小时;P < 0.0001)。然而,当细胞受到伤寒杆菌的挑战时,所有剂量都能减轻病原体造成的完整性丧失(处理×小时;P<0.0001)。在细胞受到过氧化氢挑战时,较大剂量(1.00 × 108 CFU)的细胞支持时间更长(处理×小时;P < 0.0001)。这些体外研究结果为探索使用新型 DFM 的潜在益处奠定了基础,这种新型 DFM 是减轻反刍动物肠炎沙门氏菌感染、改善动物健康、食品安全和公共卫生的一种有前途的工具和策略。要验证这些初步的体外结果,还需要进一步的体内确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信