A novel anterior approach toward robotic radical prostatectomy is associated with earlier continence recovery than the conventional approach

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Satoshi Washino, Kimitoshi Saito, Kai Yazaki, Tomoaki Miyagawa
{"title":"A novel anterior approach toward robotic radical prostatectomy is associated with earlier continence recovery than the conventional approach","authors":"Satoshi Washino,&nbsp;Kimitoshi Saito,&nbsp;Kai Yazaki,&nbsp;Tomoaki Miyagawa","doi":"10.1111/iju.15599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To advance robotic radical prostatectomy, we developed a novel anterior approach that uses a peritoneal incision created between the umbilical ligaments to develop the Retzius space and thus spares vessels that surround the bladder and prostate, with the space being closed after prostatectomy and vesicourethral anastomosis. This approach may improve continence recovery. We investigated continence recovery following the novel anterior approach compared to after the conventional anterior approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively reviewed 516 patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy from January 2019 to July 2023. We compared continence recovery following our novel anterior approach (<i>N</i> = 282) to that after conventional anterior approach (<i>N</i> = 234), and we compared the oncological outcomes and safety profiles of the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patient demographics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Continence recovery in patients undergoing the novel anterior approach was significantly better than that of patients treated via the conventional approach (hazard ratio: 1.651, 95% confidence interval: 1.325–2.057, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Use of the novel anterior approach in addition to nerve sparing and preservation of the detrusor apron independently predicted continence, and the mixture of these three techniques afforded excellent continence recovery (1- and 2-year total continence rate of 81.1% and 93.7%). Neither the biochemical recurrence-free survival nor the complication rate differed significantly between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our novel anterior approach may improve continence recovery compared to the conventional anterior approach, without compromising the oncological outcomes. Prospective comparative studies are necessary to confirm the benefits of this approach.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":"32 1","pages":"80-87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iju.15599","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To advance robotic radical prostatectomy, we developed a novel anterior approach that uses a peritoneal incision created between the umbilical ligaments to develop the Retzius space and thus spares vessels that surround the bladder and prostate, with the space being closed after prostatectomy and vesicourethral anastomosis. This approach may improve continence recovery. We investigated continence recovery following the novel anterior approach compared to after the conventional anterior approach.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 516 patients who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy from January 2019 to July 2023. We compared continence recovery following our novel anterior approach (N = 282) to that after conventional anterior approach (N = 234), and we compared the oncological outcomes and safety profiles of the two groups.

Results

Patient demographics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Continence recovery in patients undergoing the novel anterior approach was significantly better than that of patients treated via the conventional approach (hazard ratio: 1.651, 95% confidence interval: 1.325–2.057, p < 0.0001). Use of the novel anterior approach in addition to nerve sparing and preservation of the detrusor apron independently predicted continence, and the mixture of these three techniques afforded excellent continence recovery (1- and 2-year total continence rate of 81.1% and 93.7%). Neither the biochemical recurrence-free survival nor the complication rate differed significantly between the two groups.

Conclusion

Our novel anterior approach may improve continence recovery compared to the conventional anterior approach, without compromising the oncological outcomes. Prospective comparative studies are necessary to confirm the benefits of this approach.

与传统方法相比,机器人前列腺癌根治术的新型前列腺切除术可更早恢复尿失禁。
目的:为了推进机器人根治性前列腺切除术,我们开发了一种新型前路方法,利用脐韧带之间的腹膜切口来开发 Retzius 间隙,从而避开膀胱和前列腺周围的血管,在前列腺切除和膀胱尿道吻合术后关闭该间隙。这种方法可能会改善尿失禁的恢复。我们研究了新型前列腺切除术后与传统前列腺切除术后的尿失禁恢复情况:我们对 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月期间接受机器人前列腺癌根治术的 516 名患者进行了回顾性研究。我们比较了新型前路方法(N = 282)和传统前路方法(N = 234)后的尿失禁恢复情况,并比较了两组患者的肿瘤学结果和安全性:结果:两组患者的人口统计学特征无明显差异。结果:两组患者的人口统计学无明显差异,新型前路方法患者的排便恢复情况明显优于传统方法(危险比:1.651,95% 置信区间:1.325-2.057,P 结论:我们的新型前路方法可改善患者的排便恢复情况:与传统前路方法相比,我们的新型前路方法可改善患者的尿失禁恢复情况,同时不影响肿瘤治疗效果。有必要进行前瞻性比较研究,以确认这种方法的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Urology
International Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
340
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信