Lawrence A. Lavery, Arthur N. Tarricone, Mario C. Reyes, Mehmet A. Suludere, Matthew J. Sideman, Michael C. Siah, Edgar J. G. Peters, Dane K. Wukich
{"title":"Does complete resection of infected bone improve clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis?","authors":"Lawrence A. Lavery, Arthur N. Tarricone, Mario C. Reyes, Mehmet A. Suludere, Matthew J. Sideman, Michael C. Siah, Edgar J. G. Peters, Dane K. Wukich","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of the study was to compare outcomes in patients with complete surgical resection versus partial resection of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (OM). A post hoc analysis of 171 patients with OM was performed using data from two randomized clinical trials. OM was confirmed with bone culture or histopathology. Surgical culture specimens were obtained from resected bone and sent for histopathology and microbiology. Residual osteomyelitis (RO) was defined as a positive resected margin on culture or histopathology. No residual osteomyelitis (NRO) was defined as no growth from bone culture and no histopathological inflammation in the biopsy of the resection margin. Data from the 12-month follow-up were used to determine clinical outcomes. During the index hospitalization, NRO patients had significantly shorter duration of antibiotic therapy (NRO 21.0, 13.0–38.0 vs. RO 37.0, 20.8–50.0, <i>p</i> <0.01) and more amputations than patients with RO (NRO 89.9% vs. RO 60.9%, <i>p</i> <0.01). During the 12-month follow-up, patients with NRO also had significantly shorter duration of antibiotic therapy (NRO 42, 21.0–66.5 vs. RO 50.5, 35.0–75.0, <i>p</i> = 0.02). During the 12-month follow-up, there was no difference in ulceration at the same site (NRO 3.7%, RO 4.3% <i>p</i> = 0.85), hospitalization (NRO 32.6%, RO 34.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.76), total re-infections (NRO 25.3%, RO 29.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.56), re-infection with osteomyelitis (NRO 13.3% vs. 13.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.36), amputation (NRO 8.8%, RO 5.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.86) and time to wound healing in days (NRO 94, 41.0–365 vs. RO 106, 42.8–365, <i>p</i> = 0.77). Successful treatment of osteomyelitis was achieved by 86.7% and 86.5% of patients. During the index hospitalization, patients with no residual osteomyelitis had more amputations and were treated with antibiotics for a shorter duration. During the 12-month follow-up, patients with no residual osteomyelitis had shorter durations of antibiotics. There were no differences in re-infection, amputation, re-ulceration or hospitalization.</p><p><b>Level of evidence:</b> 1</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective of the study was to compare outcomes in patients with complete surgical resection versus partial resection of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (OM). A post hoc analysis of 171 patients with OM was performed using data from two randomized clinical trials. OM was confirmed with bone culture or histopathology. Surgical culture specimens were obtained from resected bone and sent for histopathology and microbiology. Residual osteomyelitis (RO) was defined as a positive resected margin on culture or histopathology. No residual osteomyelitis (NRO) was defined as no growth from bone culture and no histopathological inflammation in the biopsy of the resection margin. Data from the 12-month follow-up were used to determine clinical outcomes. During the index hospitalization, NRO patients had significantly shorter duration of antibiotic therapy (NRO 21.0, 13.0–38.0 vs. RO 37.0, 20.8–50.0, p <0.01) and more amputations than patients with RO (NRO 89.9% vs. RO 60.9%, p <0.01). During the 12-month follow-up, patients with NRO also had significantly shorter duration of antibiotic therapy (NRO 42, 21.0–66.5 vs. RO 50.5, 35.0–75.0, p = 0.02). During the 12-month follow-up, there was no difference in ulceration at the same site (NRO 3.7%, RO 4.3% p = 0.85), hospitalization (NRO 32.6%, RO 34.8%, p = 0.76), total re-infections (NRO 25.3%, RO 29.3%, p = 0.56), re-infection with osteomyelitis (NRO 13.3% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.36), amputation (NRO 8.8%, RO 5.4%, p = 0.86) and time to wound healing in days (NRO 94, 41.0–365 vs. RO 106, 42.8–365, p = 0.77). Successful treatment of osteomyelitis was achieved by 86.7% and 86.5% of patients. During the index hospitalization, patients with no residual osteomyelitis had more amputations and were treated with antibiotics for a shorter duration. During the 12-month follow-up, patients with no residual osteomyelitis had shorter durations of antibiotics. There were no differences in re-infection, amputation, re-ulceration or hospitalization.
该研究旨在比较糖尿病足骨髓炎(OM)患者完全手术切除与部分切除的疗效。利用两项随机临床试验的数据,对171名OM患者进行了事后分析。OM经骨培养或组织病理学证实。从切除的骨骼中获取手术培养标本,并送去进行组织病理学和微生物学检查。残留骨髓炎(RO)的定义是切除边缘的培养或组织病理学结果呈阳性。无残留骨髓炎(NRO)是指骨培养无生长,切除边缘活检无组织病理学炎症。12个月的随访数据用于确定临床结果。在指数住院期间,NRO患者的抗生素治疗时间明显较短(NRO 21.0,13.0-38.0 vs. RO 37.0,20.8-50.0,p
期刊介绍:
The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories:
- Research papers
- Review articles
- Clinical studies
- Letters
- News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies.
Calendar of events
The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.