Himani Byregowda, Ryoko Susukida, Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili, Monique Wilson, Marie Stratton, Renee M Johnson
{"title":"Ratio of emergency department visits to deaths for opioid overdose.","authors":"Himani Byregowda, Ryoko Susukida, Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili, Monique Wilson, Marie Stratton, Renee M Johnson","doi":"10.1136/ip-2023-045116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on fatal and non-fatal overdose provide important information about the magnitude of the overdose crisis. We consider these metrics in tandem and estimated the ratio of opioid overdose-related emergency department (ED) visits to opioid overdose deaths. A lower ratio could indicate more fatal overdoses, fewer overdose reversals with naloxone or a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data are from the Maryland Vital Statistics Administration (opioid overdose deaths), the Health Services Cost Review Commission (non-fatal ED visits for opioid overdose). We generated 2020 annual rates of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose deaths for the state of Maryland and its 24 jurisdictions and estimated the ratio of opioid overdose-related ED visits to deaths.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2020 visit-to-death ratio for Maryland was 1.7, and ranged from 0.9 to 3.8 across jurisdictions. We identified five counties that had above-median rates of opioid overdose-related ED visits and deaths, and low visit-to-death ratios.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that there were nearly two ED visits for each opioid overdose death in Maryland, and there was substantial variation across counties. The visit-to-death ratio enables a better understanding of the relationship between fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose and is essential to averting deaths and evaluating overdose prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":13682,"journal":{"name":"Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2023-045116","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Data on fatal and non-fatal overdose provide important information about the magnitude of the overdose crisis. We consider these metrics in tandem and estimated the ratio of opioid overdose-related emergency department (ED) visits to opioid overdose deaths. A lower ratio could indicate more fatal overdoses, fewer overdose reversals with naloxone or a combination of both.
Methods: Data are from the Maryland Vital Statistics Administration (opioid overdose deaths), the Health Services Cost Review Commission (non-fatal ED visits for opioid overdose). We generated 2020 annual rates of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose deaths for the state of Maryland and its 24 jurisdictions and estimated the ratio of opioid overdose-related ED visits to deaths.
Results: The 2020 visit-to-death ratio for Maryland was 1.7, and ranged from 0.9 to 3.8 across jurisdictions. We identified five counties that had above-median rates of opioid overdose-related ED visits and deaths, and low visit-to-death ratios.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that there were nearly two ED visits for each opioid overdose death in Maryland, and there was substantial variation across counties. The visit-to-death ratio enables a better understanding of the relationship between fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose and is essential to averting deaths and evaluating overdose prevention efforts.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1995, Injury Prevention has been the pre-eminent repository of original research and compelling commentary relevant to this increasingly important field. An international peer reviewed journal, it offers the best in science, policy, and public health practice to reduce the burden of injury in all age groups around the world. The journal publishes original research, opinion, debate and special features on the prevention of unintentional, occupational and intentional (violence-related) injuries. Injury Prevention is online only.