Enhanced alveolar ridge preservation with hyaluronic acid-enriched allografts: a comparative study of granular allografts with and without hyaluronic acid addition.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frank R Kloss, Thomas Kau, Diana Heimes, Peer W Kämmerer, Anita Kloss-Brandstätter
{"title":"Enhanced alveolar ridge preservation with hyaluronic acid-enriched allografts: a comparative study of granular allografts with and without hyaluronic acid addition.","authors":"Frank R Kloss, Thomas Kau, Diana Heimes, Peer W Kämmerer, Anita Kloss-Brandstätter","doi":"10.1186/s40729-024-00559-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ridge preservation is essential to restore alveolar ridge volume and to enhance esthetic and functional outcomes for dental implants. The addition of hyaluronic acid to allogeneic bone substitute materials might enhance these outcomes. This clinical study evaluated the efficacy of ridge preservation after tooth extraction using granular allografts with and without hyaluronic acid addition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 40 patients with compromised extraction sockets were enrolled. Among them, 19 received particulate allogeneic bone substitutes (Allo), 21 received allogeneic bone substitutes with hyaluronic acid (AlloHya). Vertical and horizontal graft stability, graft shrinkage rate, and bone mineral density were assessed using radiographic measurements on CBCT scans conducted before tooth extraction, directly after ridge preservation and after four months. Patients were followed up 12 months post-implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vertical height loss after 4 months was significantly greater in the Allo group (-0.82 ± 0.95 mm) compared to the AlloHya group (-0.19 ± 0.51 mm; p = 0.011). Graft shrinkage rate was 16.9 ± 11.5% (Allo) and 10.3 ± 7.7% (AlloHya) (p = 0.038). After four months, average bone density was significantly higher in the AlloHya compared to the Allo group (p = 0.004). Nearly all implants (39 out of 40) were classified as \"Success\" according to the ICOI scheme, with no differences in implant quality between the two study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improved graft stability, reduced resorption, and increased bone density were observed in hyaluronic acid-enriched allografts compared to pure allografts. Adding hyaluronic acid to allogeneic bone grafts significantly enhanced outcomes in ridge preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"10 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00559-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ridge preservation is essential to restore alveolar ridge volume and to enhance esthetic and functional outcomes for dental implants. The addition of hyaluronic acid to allogeneic bone substitute materials might enhance these outcomes. This clinical study evaluated the efficacy of ridge preservation after tooth extraction using granular allografts with and without hyaluronic acid addition.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 40 patients with compromised extraction sockets were enrolled. Among them, 19 received particulate allogeneic bone substitutes (Allo), 21 received allogeneic bone substitutes with hyaluronic acid (AlloHya). Vertical and horizontal graft stability, graft shrinkage rate, and bone mineral density were assessed using radiographic measurements on CBCT scans conducted before tooth extraction, directly after ridge preservation and after four months. Patients were followed up 12 months post-implantation.

Results: Vertical height loss after 4 months was significantly greater in the Allo group (-0.82 ± 0.95 mm) compared to the AlloHya group (-0.19 ± 0.51 mm; p = 0.011). Graft shrinkage rate was 16.9 ± 11.5% (Allo) and 10.3 ± 7.7% (AlloHya) (p = 0.038). After four months, average bone density was significantly higher in the AlloHya compared to the Allo group (p = 0.004). Nearly all implants (39 out of 40) were classified as "Success" according to the ICOI scheme, with no differences in implant quality between the two study groups.

Conclusions: Improved graft stability, reduced resorption, and increased bone density were observed in hyaluronic acid-enriched allografts compared to pure allografts. Adding hyaluronic acid to allogeneic bone grafts significantly enhanced outcomes in ridge preservation.

使用富含透明质酸的异体牙槽骨强化牙槽嵴保存:添加和不添加透明质酸的颗粒状异体牙槽骨的比较研究。
目的:牙槽嵴保留对于恢复牙槽嵴体积以及提高种植牙的美学和功能效果至关重要。在异体骨替代材料中添加透明质酸可能会提高这些效果。这项临床研究评估了在拔牙后使用添加或不添加透明质酸的颗粒状异体骨替代材料进行牙槽嵴保存的效果:在这项回顾性研究中,共纳入了 40 名牙槽骨受损的拔牙患者。其中,19 人接受了颗粒状异体骨替代物(Allo),21 人接受了添加透明质酸的异体骨替代物(AlloHya)。在拔牙前、保留牙脊后和四个月后,通过 CBCT 扫描进行放射学测量,评估垂直和水平移植物的稳定性、移植物收缩率和骨矿物质密度。结果:结果:与 AlloHya 组(-0.19 ± 0.51 mm; p = 0.011)相比,Allo 组 4 个月后的垂直高度损失明显更大(-0.82 ± 0.95 mm)。移植物收缩率为 16.9 ± 11.5%(Allo)和 10.3 ± 7.7%(AlloHya)(p = 0.038)。四个月后,AlloHya 组的平均骨密度明显高于 Allo 组(p = 0.004)。根据 ICOI 计划,几乎所有的种植体(40 个中有 39 个)都被归类为 "成功",两个研究组的种植体质量没有差异:结论:与纯异体移植物相比,富含透明质酸的异体移植物稳定性更好,吸收减少,骨密度增加。在同种异体骨移植物中添加透明质酸能显著提高骨脊保存效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信